How Often Does This Happen?

A man was born on Jan 1st for some year in the first half of the nineteenth century. On Jan 1st of the year x 2 x^2 , it turns out that the man was x x years old. When was he born?


The answer is 1806.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

5 solutions

Prince Loomba
Jun 1, 2016

Let y be the year of birth. It is given 1800 < y < 1850 1800 <y<1850 since he was born in first half of 19th century. And since he was x x years old in the year x 2 x^{2} , he was born in the year x 2 x x^{2}-x . Thus y = x 2 x y=x^{2}-x . Solving the inequality, x 2 x 1800 > 0 a n d x 2 x 1850 < 0 x^{2}-x-1800>0 \quad and \quad x^{2}-x-1850 <0 . Solve these two and the only integer value of x we get is 43.

Integer, not integral

Kobe Cheung - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

Ok changed

Prince Loomba - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

How can an equation be both greater and less than 0? Wouldn't that violate the line rule for functions? I was under the belief that it would be 1842 since 7 squared is 49, and 49 minus 7 is 42...

Jeff Kavanaugh - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

@Jeff Kavanaugh See the constants of the 2 equations, these are different

Prince Loomba - 5 years ago

43^2=1849. So,why the answer can't be 43????????

niloy debnath - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

You are like me Got half the answer right. What he is asking is the year he was born not his age. At 1849 he was 43 years old. so he was born 43 years before that 1849-43=1806

Mohamed Adel - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

sorry. i was totally wrong!!!!!!!!!!!

niloy debnath - 5 years ago

43 is not the answer. It is his age. Answer is 1849-43=1806

Prince Loomba - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

sorry. i was wrong totally!!!!!!!!!!! i was just out of my mind.

niloy debnath - 5 years ago

The man is x x years old in the year x 2 x^2

Therefore he was x x = 0 x-x=0 years in the year x 2 x x^2-x .Hence he was born in the year x 2 x x^2-x .

Since it is given that he was born in the first half of the nineteenth century,hence 1800 < x 2 x < 1850 1800<x^2-x<1850 .Solving,we get that the only integral value of his age is 43 43 and hence he was born in the year 43 ( 42 ) = 1806 43(42)=\boxed{1806}

good one..+1

Ayush G Rai - 5 years ago
Jorge Fernández
Jun 7, 2016

1805 is also valid, it is possible to have been born in 1805 and be 43 years old in 1849

Thanks for pointing out that if someone is born on June 1st 1805, then they are 43 years old on January 1st 1849, which satisfies the conditions of the problem.

I have since edited the statement for clarity.

In future, if you spot any errors with a problem, you can “report” it by selecting "report problem" in the menu. This will notify the problem creator (and eventually staff) who can fix the issues. Also, if you include a more detailed explanation of your reasoning, that would help others easily understand what you are referring to.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 12 months ago
Wenjin C.
Jun 7, 2016

The first half of the 19th century is from 1800 to 1850 inclusive. Since it is stated that the man is x x years old at the year x 2 x^2 , and was born in the first half 19th century, let's first assume that 1800 < x 2 x < 1850 1800<x^2-x<1850 . Using square root algorithm on 1850, the maximum value of x x is 43 (basing on the assumption previously made). Now, assuming the man was 43 years old at the year 4 3 2 = 1849 43^2=1849 , let's get the year of when he was born based on this assumption: 1849 43 = 1806 1849-43=1806 . Seeing this, x can't get lower than 43 (since 1806 is already very near 1800 and if x = 42 x=42 , the year of which the man would be born is 1722, which isn't anymore in the 19th century, but in the 18th century) nor can it get higher than 43 (since 4 4 2 44 = 1936 44 = 1892 44^2-44=1936-44=1892 is in the second half of the 19th century, not in the first half). Thus, the year of when he was born is 1806 .

I'm not sure if my solution is quite right, but I hope it helps a lot! :)

I'm willing to accept critical remarks/comments or questions from anyone regarding my solution, thanks. :))

Moderator note:

The following statement is false:

Since it is stated that the man is x x years old at the year x 2 x^2 , and was born in the first half 19th century, let's first assume that 1800 < x 2 < 1850 1800<x^2<1850 .

What is true, is that the man was born in x 2 x x^2 - x , and thus we have 1800 x 2 x < 1850 1800 \leq x^2 - x < 1850 .

The following statement is false:

Since it is stated that the man is x x years old at the year x 2 x^2 , and was born in the first half 19th century, let's first assume that 1800 < x 2 < 1850 1800<x^2<1850 .

What is true, is that the man was born in x 2 x x^2 - x , and thus we have 1800 x 2 x < 1850 1800 \leq x^2 - x < 1850 .

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 12 months ago

@Calvin Lin , thanks for correcting me!:)

Wenjin C. - 4 years, 7 months ago
Ayush G Rai
May 21, 2016

Let the year of birth be y y .It is given that 1800 y < 1850 1800 \leq y < 1850 and x 2 = y + x x^2=y+x .therefore 1800 ( x 1 ) x < 1850 1800 \leq (x-1)x <1850 .A simple check gives x = 43 x=43 and hence y = 42 × 43 = 1806 y=42\times43=\boxed{1806} .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...