1 1 + 2 1 − 3 1 − 4 1 + 5 1 + 6 1 − 7 1 − 8 1 + ⋯
If the closed form of the sum above can be expressed as a π + ln ( a ) , where a is a positive integer, find a .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The above expression can be written as
r = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 4 r − 3 1 + 4 r − 2 1 − 4 r − 1 1 − 4 r 1 )
= r = 0 ∑ ∞ ∫ 0 1 ( x 4 r − 4 + x 4 r − 3 + x 4 r − 2 + x 4 r − 1 ) d x
= ∫ 0 1 ( r = 0 ∑ ∞ ( x 4 r − 4 + x 4 r − 3 − x 4 r − 2 − x 4 r − 1 ) ) d x
= ∫ 0 1 ( 1 − x 4 1 + 1 − x 4 x − 1 − x 4 x 2 − 1 − x 4 x 3 ) d x
= ∫ 0 1 1 + x 2 1 + x d x = 4 π + ln ( 4 )
Consider Maclaurin series of the following:
− ln ( 1 − x ) − ln ( 1 − i ) − i ln ( 1 − i ) i ln ( 1 − i ) = x + 2 x 2 + 3 x 3 + 4 x 4 + + 5 x 5 + 6 x 6 + 7 x 7 + 8 x 8 ⋯ = i + 2 i 2 + 3 i 3 + 4 i 4 + 5 i 5 + 6 i 6 + 7 i 7 + 8 i 8 + ⋯ = 1 + 2 i + 3 i 2 + 4 i 3 + 5 i 4 + 6 i 5 + 7 i 6 + 8 i 7 + ⋯ = 1 + 2 i − 3 1 − 4 i + 5 1 + 6 i − 7 1 − 8 i + ⋯ Putting x = i Dividing both sides by i
Therefore, we have:
S = 1 + 2 1 − 3 1 − 4 1 + 5 1 + 6 1 − 7 1 − 8 1 + ⋯ = ℜ [ i ln ( 1 − i ) ] + ℑ [ i ln ( 1 − i ) ] = ℜ [ i ln ( 2 e − 4 π i ) ] + ℑ [ i ln ( 2 e − 4 π i ) ] = ℜ [ i ( 2 ln 2 − 4 π i ) ] + ℑ [ i ( 2 ln 2 − 4 π i ) ] = ℜ [ 4 π + 2 ln 2 i ] + ℑ [ 4 π + 2 ln 2 i ] = 4 π + 2 ln 2 = 4 π + 4 ln 4
⟹ a = 4
For the first line, if -1<x <=1 is true, then x=i does not fall under this range.
Log in to reply
I was trying to resolve this but don't know how.
Log in to reply
The issue is here is that you started with the geometric progression sum , 1 − x 1 = 1 + x + x 2 + ⋯ for − 1 < x < 1 (and then you integrate it).
After you integrate it, the domain of the function ∫ 0 x 1 − v 1 d v will still remain − 1 < x < 1 (and might work at the endpoints as well, which can be proven via squeeze theorem ). So you can't say "Oh, I substitute x = i and it just magically works!". To justify that x = i works, you need to show that ∣ i ∣ = 1 is at the end point of − 1 < x < 1 , so you got to prove that − ln ( 1 − x ) = ( what you have written up ) also converges when x = i first.
I didn't solve it your way, but what I would have done is to convert all the fractions to the form of ∫ 0 1 x n d x , then summing over all the integrals. You should get Aditya's method.
Addendum:
Note that 1 − i = 2 ( 2 1 − 2 i ) = 2 cis ( − 4 π + 2 π k ) for any integer k . So there are actually infinitely many values of ln ( 1 − i ) . So, how can you justify that the final value you found is the unique answer?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
This is essentially the composition of two series that is, n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 n + 1 ( − 1 ) n = 4 π which is the series for tan − 1 x .
The other one is :
n = 1 ∑ ∞ n ( − 1 ) n − 1 = ln 2
Adding the first and half of the second we get the desired series and the result is 4 π + ln 4 which makes the answer 4