Making a Left Turn

An interplanetary probe speeding in deep space suddenly needs to make a left turn.

It is presently traveling at v = 20 000 m / s v= \SI[per-mode=symbol]{20000}{\meter\per\second} , and needs to make a quarter circle turn, continuing at the same tangential speed. It is equipped with an ion thruster rocket capable of ejecting ions at V = 50 000 m / s V= \SI[per-mode=symbol]{50000}{\meter\per\second} . Moreover, it is a very advanced model that gets its ions from outer space so that the weight of the probe remains unchanged during its turn.

It takes a certain amount of total energy E E to propel the probe around this quarter circle turn. If the kinetic energy of the probe is T = 1 2 m v 2 T=\frac{1}{2}m{v}^{2} (which remains unchanged throughout), what is the ratio E T ? \dfrac{E}{T}? Submit your answer to 3 decimal places.


Details and Assumptions:

  • Assume that no energy is gained or lost in the probe's acquisition of interplanetary ions before they are ejected by the ion thruster engine.
  • Assume that the probe undergoes rotation during the turn so that the ion thrust always points outward from the center of the turn, again with no energy expended for this rotation.
  • Assume that there are no gravitational masses nearby.


The answer is 3.927.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Steven Chase
Jun 2, 2017

For the sake of variety, here's how I did it ( m m = probe mass, M M = total ion mass, v v = probe speed, V V = ion speed):

F = m v 2 R = M ˙ V M ˙ = m v 2 R V \large{F = \frac{m v^2}{R} = \dot{M} V \implies \dot{M} = \frac{m v^2}{R V}}

The time taken for the quarter circle is:

t q c = ( π / 2 ) R v = π R 2 v \large{t_{qc} = \frac{(\pi/2)R}{v} = \frac{\pi R}{2v}}

The total expended ion mass is:

M = m v 2 R V π R 2 v = π m v 2 V \large{M = \frac{m v^2}{R V} \frac{\pi R}{2v} = \frac{\pi m v }{2V}}

The total ion kinetic energy is:

2 E = M V 2 = π m v V 2 \large{2E = M V^2 = \frac{\pi m v V }{2}}

The probe kinetic energy is:

2 T = m v 2 \large{2T = m v^2}

The ratio is therefore:

E T = π m v V 2 m v 2 = π V 2 v = π 2 5 2 3.927 \large{\frac{E}{T} = \frac{\pi m v V }{2 m v^2} = \frac{\pi V }{2 v} = \frac{\pi}{2} \frac{5}{2} \approx \boxed{3.927}}

Thanks, I appreciated your more general solution. Yes, it's another way of understanding this problem. Rocket engineering is a distinct field of study.

Michael Mendrin - 4 years ago

Log in to reply

Thanks. I suppose the force and momentum approaches are two sides of the same coin. I scratched my head a bit over the first line of your solution. I recognize the left side as the magnitude of the differential change in the probe's vector momentum. And the right side is similar, but for the ion stream. I've always understood momentum conservation as a vector proposition, and you're making it work in a scalar context. So it's initially a bit counter-intuitive. But then remembering that the horizontal and vertical deltas must individually equate, it follows that the lengths of the delta vectors must also equate; hence the scalar equivalence. That's a cool realization.

Steven Chase - 4 years ago

Log in to reply

I should really add a graphic to illustrate the point you've just made

Michael Mendrin - 4 years ago

Log in to reply

@Michael Mendrin Sounds good

Steven Chase - 4 years ago
Michael Mendrin
Jun 2, 2017

During a incremental change in direction d θ d\theta , the change in momentum is m v d θ mv d\theta . Let M M be the mass of ions ejected during this time. Then for momentum to be conserved, we have

m v d θ = M V mv d\theta=MV

The energy required to propel this mass M M to velocity V V is 1 2 M V 2 \frac{1}{2}M{V}^{2} , so we have

1 2 m v V d θ = 1 2 M V 2 \frac{1}{2}mvV d\theta=\frac{1}{2}M{V}^{2}

We integrate over θ \theta to get

E = 1 2 m v V Δ θ E=\frac{1}{2}mvV\Delta \theta

so that

E T = V v Δ θ = V v π 2 = 3.927... \dfrac{E}{T}=\dfrac{V}{v}\Delta \theta=\dfrac{V}{v}\dfrac{\pi}{2}=3.927...

Moral: Making a left turn in outer space is a costly proposition

This was a better solution.

Kunal Kundwani - 3 years, 12 months ago

In which direction does the rocket exhaust the ions to make this turn?

Rohit Gupta - 3 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

In the direction away from the center of rotation. But when NASA rockets actually do make course adjustments, changing direction (usually only very slightly), the rocket exhaust points in one direction only throughout. This quarter-turn is a fantasy maneuver that NASA would never think to employ.

Michael Mendrin - 3 years, 12 months ago
Arjen Vreugdenhil
Jun 13, 2017

The force on the rocket is, on one hand, the needed centripetal force for a circle of radius R R (not specified here!); on the other hand, it is equal to the rate at which momentum is given to the ions. Thus F = m v 2 R = μ V , F = m\frac{v^2}R = \mu V, where μ \mu is the mass rate at which the ions are ejected.

The total kinetic energy given to the ejected ions is E = 1 2 μ V 2 t , E = \tfrac12\mu V^2 t, where t t is the time needed for the quarter turn. This is easily found to be t = 1 2 π R / v t = \tfrac12\pi R/v . Thus E = 1 2 μ V 2 1 2 π R v = π 4 ( m v 2 R ) V R v = π 4 m v V . E = \tfrac12\mu V^2\cdot \tfrac12\pi \frac Rv = \frac\pi 4 \left(m\frac{v^2}R\right) V\frac R v = \frac\pi 4 mvV. Finally, using V = 5 2 v V = \frac 5 2 v , we find E = 5 π 4 1 2 m v 2 E T = 5 π 4 3.927 . E = \frac{5\pi}4\cdot \tfrac12mv^2\ \ \ \ \therefore\ \ \ \ \frac E T = \frac{5\pi}4 \approx \boxed{3.927}.

The assumption here is that the ions are ejected at their maximum speed. It costs less energy (but more time) to eject them at slower speed.

You've raised an excellent and important fact about rockets. The higher the rocket exhaust speed, the higher the energy costs will be to achieve the same results. The tradeoff is that conventional chemical rockets have to carry more weight in fuel. Jet airplanes have higher propulsion efficiency because they use the air itself as part of the ejected mass.

Nevertheless, because of the attractive feature of low fuel (or ejecta) mass requirements, engineers continue to develop ion thruster rockets capable of ejecting ions over 200,000 meters per second.

Michael Mendrin Staff - 3 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

...also. Course corrections are made in the middle of a leg between orbits where the angle of variation (and so energy) is minimized.

Ed Sirett - 3 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

Again, a correct observation.

Michael Mendrin Staff - 3 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

@Michael Mendrin Oops, on thinking about this I realize that the angle is minimized at the start of the journey...But there are several engineering factors to consider, (as always): 1) The space craft is usually slowing down or speeding up (I'm thinking here about lunar or solar system voyages) so the ideal may move away from the beginning. 2) The craft needs to travel for enough time & distance to get accurate navigation data needed to make just the right correction. This is probably the over-whelming factor. I believe that on the Apollo transits the course corrections where done at about mid-way on the outbound and nearer the start on the inbound leg.

As you rightly point out the velocity of the ejecta is the limiting factor and getting the ejecta to speeds of nearly 0.1%c is truly remarkable.

Ed Sirett - 3 years, 12 months ago
Colin Gu
Jun 15, 2017

The initial momentum p has spinned 90 degrees, the arc represents for how and how much momentum is changed, the radial length is p, the arc's length is p(3.14/2), (because p=mv, e=mv^2/2), E/T = (arc V)/(radius v) = 3.14(5/4)

If the momentum spins by 90 degrees, then it changes by p 2 p \sqrt{2} . Why have you multiplied momentum with π 2 \frac{\pi}{2} instead?

Pranshu Gaba - 3 years, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...