I = k → ∞ lim ∫ 0 1 2 k x n = 1 ∏ k ( e x / 2 n + e − x / 2 n ) d x
If I can be expressed in the form of C e ( e + A ) B , where A , B and C are integers satisfying A + B + C < 5 , find the product A B C .
Clarification : e ≈ 2 . 7 1 8 2 8 denotes the Euler's number .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
In the second line of your simplification of R , you seem to be implying that u e u → 1 and u e − u → − 1 as u → 0 . Neither of these is true. What we do have is u e u − e − u = u 2 sinh u → 2 as u → 0 .
Log in to reply
Here, the limits are interchanged by the dominated convergence theorem where g ( x ) = sinh x (with the notations you used in the countour integral problem) right?
Log in to reply
Yes, because sinh u u ≤ 1 for all u .
Log in to reply
@Mark Hennings – Yes. Thanks for confirming it!
One more thing, if we define (for natural k ) f k ( x ) = sinh 2 k x 2 k x sinh x (on [ 0 , 1 ] ) and f ( x ) = sinh x (on [ 0 , 1 ] ) then we can conclude that f k → f uniformly right?
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Yes, that works in this case, and it is enough to enable us to interchange the limit and the integral over the finite interval [ 0 , 1 ] .
Log in to reply
@Mark Hennings – Yes. Thanks for confirming it (again)! (I'm very new to applying this.)
Edit:
By finite you meant bounded right?
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – I should have said bounded.
I forgot to show + 1 − 1 in my solution... Typo corrected
@Rishabh Cool The problem asks to find the product A B C , not the sum A + B + C
We begin with the identities
-1. sinh ( 2 ϕ ) = 2 sinh ( ϕ ) cosh ( ϕ ) .
-2. cosh ( θ ) = 2 1 ( e θ + e − θ )
We have sinh ( x )
After repeatedly applying (1) k times on the above expression on each recurring hyperbolic-sine, we achieve:
sinh ( x ) = 2 k sinh ( 2 k x ) ∏ n = 1 k cosh ( 2 k x )
Now we may take the limit as k approaches infinity.
sinh ( x ) = lim k → ∞ 2 k sinh ( 2 k x ) ∏ n = 1 k cosh ( 2 k x )
In order to evaluate this limit, we must define a function and use l'Hospital's Rule on the 2 k sinh ( 2 k x ) factor.
Let (with 'a' being an arbitrary constant) f ( y ) = 2 y sinh ( 2 y a ) = 2 − y sinh ( 2 y a )
Using l'Hospital's Rule, we differentiate the top and bottom with respect to 'y' and easily evaluate the limit.
lim y → ∞ f ( y ) = lim y → ∞ ( − 1 ) ( ln 2 ) ( 2 − y ) ( − 1 ) ( ln 2 ) ( 2 − y ) ( a ) cosh ( 2 y a ) = lim y → ∞ ( a ) cosh ( 2 y a ) = a cosh ( 0 ) = a
So,
-3. sinh ( x ) = lim k → ∞ x ∏ n = 1 k cosh ( 2 k x ) (This is essentially Viète's formula.)
Now let us look at the problem:
Using (2) the expression inside the product may be simplified to 2 cosh ( 2 n x )
I = lim k → ∞ ∫ 0 1 2 k x ∏ n = 1 k ( 2 cosh ( 2 n x ) ) d x .
We now see that '2' is multiplied k times in product so it cancels with the 2^(-k) outside the product.
I = lim k → ∞ ∫ 0 1 x ∏ n = 1 k ( cosh ( 2 n x ) ) d x .
Using (3) this simplifies to a very simple integral.
I = ∫ 0 1 sinh ( x ) d x = cosh ( 1 ) − cosh ( 0 )
To evaluate this into the correct form, we must use (2) to simplify the first term.
I = 2 1 ( e + e 1 ) − 1 = 2 e e 2 + 1 − 1 = 2 e e 2 − 2 e + 1
The numerator of I is a perfect square.
I = 2 e ( e − 1 ) 2 . A = − 1 , B = 2 , C = 2 .
A B C = ( − 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 ) = -4
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
R = k → ∞ lim ∫ 0 1 2 k x L n = 1 ∏ k ( e x / 2 n + e − x / 2 n ) d x
L = = = n = 1 ∏ k ( e x / 2 n + e − x / 2 n ) n = 1 ∏ k ( e x / 2 n − e − x / 2 n e x / 2 n − 1 − e − x / 2 n − 1 ) ( A T e l e s c o p i c P r o d u c t ) ( e x / 2 k − e − x / 2 k e x − e − x )
R = = = = = = ∫ 0 1 k → ∞ lim x / 2 k 1 L d x ∫ 0 1 k → ∞ lim 1 x / 2 k e x / 2 k − 1 − − 1 x / 2 k e − x / 2 k − 1 ( e x − e − x ) d x ∫ 0 1 2 ( e x − e − x ) d x ⎣ ⎡ 2 e x + e − x ⎦ ⎤ 0 1 2 e + e 1 − 2 ( e − e 1 ) 2 = e ( e − 1 ) 2 2 e ( e − 1 ) 2
∴ ( − 1 ) × 2 × 2 = − 4