Me Want a Heart Limb!

Geometry Level 3

Mai Valentine planned to prepare a cake for Valentine's Day. While sketching out shapes and polygons, she thought about creating a heart shape, which resembles a combination of 3 semicircles of radii r 1 r_1 , r 2 r_2 and r 1 + r 2 r_1 + r_2 , where r 1 r 2 r_1 \leq r_2 . Joey Wheeler wants to take a limb as indicated by the dashed line. He claims that

After removing a limb, the new shape's area is half the original area of the heart.

What is the ratio of r 2 r_2 to r 1 r_1 that satisfies the given statement?


This is the end of the first chapter of the story . Check the following chapter directory if you are interested:

First - Second - Third - Fourth - Fifth

None of the choices 1 5 2 \dfrac{1 - \sqrt{5}}{2} Either 1 + 5 2 \dfrac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2} or 1 5 2 \dfrac{1 - \sqrt{5}}{2} 1 + 5 2 \dfrac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Michael Huang
Jan 26, 2017

Let r 2 = k r 1 r_2 = kr_1 , such that k > 1 k > 1 . The total area of the heart is A total = A r 1 + A r 2 + A bottom = π 2 ( r 1 ) 2 + π 2 ( r 2 ) 2 + π 2 ( r 1 + r 2 ) 2 = π 2 ( ( r 1 ) 2 + ( r 2 ) 2 + ( r 1 ) 2 + ( r 2 ) 2 + 2 r 1 r 2 ) = π 2 ( 2 ( r 1 ) 2 + 2 ( r 2 ) 2 + 2 r 1 r 2 ) = π ( ( r 1 ) 2 + ( r 2 ) 2 + r 1 r 2 ) = π ( ( r 1 ) 2 + k 2 ( r 1 ) 2 + k ( r 1 ) 2 ) = π ( r 1 ) 2 ( 1 + k + k 2 ) \begin{array}{rl} A_{\text{total}} &= A_{r_1} + A_{r_2} + A_{\text{bottom}}\\ &= \dfrac{\pi}{2} \left(r_1\right)^2 + \dfrac{\pi}{2} \left(r_2\right)^2 + \dfrac{\pi}{2} \left(r_1 + r_2\right)^2\\ &= \dfrac{\pi}{2}\left(\left(r_1\right)^2 + \left(r_2\right)^2 + \left(r_1\right)^2 + \left(r_2\right)^2 + 2r_1r_2\right)\\ &= \dfrac{\pi}{2}\left(2\left(r_1\right)^2 + 2\left(r_2\right)^2 + 2r_1r_2\right)\\ &= \pi \left(\left(r_1\right)^2 + \left(r_2\right)^2 + r_1r_2\right)\\ &= \pi \left(\left(r_1\right)^2 + k^2 \left(r_1\right)^2 + k\left(r_1\right)^2\right)\\ &= \pi \left(r_1\right)^2\left(1 + k + k^2\right) \end{array} The halved area is A halved = π 2 ( r 1 ) 2 ( 1 + k + k 2 ) A_{\text{halved}} = \dfrac{\pi}{2}\left(r_1\right)^2\left(1 + k + k^2\right) We want the new area to be half the original heart's area. In that case, the circular area of the cut must be congruent to the new area. So π 2 ( r 1 ) 2 ( 1 + k + k 2 ) = π k 2 ( r 1 ) 2 π 2 ( r 1 ) 2 ( 1 + k k 2 ) = 0 1 + k k 2 = 0 k 2 k 1 = 0 k = 1 ± 1 + 4 2 = 1 ± 5 2 \begin{array}{rl} \dfrac{\pi}{2}\left(r_1\right)^2\left(1 + k + k^2\right) &= \pi k^2 \left(r_1\right)^2\\ \dfrac{\pi}{2}\left(r_1\right)^2\left(1 + k - k^2\right) &= 0\\ 1 + k - k^2 &= 0\\ k^2 - k - 1 &= 0\\ k &= \dfrac{1 \pm \sqrt{1 + 4}}{2}\\ &= \dfrac{1 \pm \sqrt{5}}{2} \end{array} Thus, since k > 1 k > 1 , the answer is k = 1 + 5 2 k = \boxed{\dfrac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}}

Hurray! I love it when I see an innovative problem that gives us the answer as the Golden Ratio. :)

Tapas Mazumdar - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Well, well. There is a high chance that gives the golden ratio. What else can I say about geometric relationship problem? :)

Michael Huang - 4 years, 4 months ago

i upvote for yugioh

Ramon Vicente Marquez - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

:D

Looks we have a Yu-Gi-Oh! fan!

Michael Huang - 4 years, 4 months ago

I was so excited that I forgot to discard the negative one 1 5 2 \frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2} .

By the way, great problem!

Muhammad Rasel Parvej - 3 years, 5 months ago
Michael Mendrin
Jan 27, 2017

Why can't k k be negative? Both possible solutions are shown in the graphic above, having in common the green semi-circle of radius 1 1 .

In any case, it's a pretty picture.

Good question! It doesn't exist in real life. :D

Michael Huang - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Don't be too sure that it's not possible to integrate negative dimensions in geometry. If you think about it, any mathematical expression involved in geometry works just as well with negative numbers. We just might get some strange results like this, but that doesn't mean such a geometry is totally senseless.

Does 4D geometry "exist in real life" or not? How about geometries that involve the imaginary number i i ?

Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Ah. You have a different perspective in geometry then. Nice thought. I've never thought of 4D geometries with negative values existence.

EDIT: Your comment pretty much reminds me of the one from Quora . :D

Michael Huang - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Michael Huang When we say "real life", that only refers to a limited range of what is possible. For example, is anti-matter part of "real life"? That was discovered by a physicist who looked into the possibility of negative energies, when it was widely thought it to be nonsensical. Meanwhile, you should look up Calabi-Yau Manifold which is a 6D dimensional geometry, all 6 of the dimensions complex---a pretty abstract thing. Yet, it plays a central role in string theory.

Mathematicians have already experimented with negative quantities in otherwise Euclidean geometry, and for the most part haven't come up with something "very useful", but that doesn't mean one won't be found eventually. You know, think outside of the box, or, in this case of this problem, inside the semicircle.


Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Michael Mendrin This could have been one of the exploration questions in the quiz! :D

Michael Huang - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Michael Huang The "exploration" part of the idea of negatives in geometry is coming up with a "toolkit", or set of definitions and rules, that will create such a geometry that doesn't contradict itself and is actually useful. Until then, it's armchair philosophy and remains speculative.

Still it's fun for me to tinker with the idea in my head as a distraction.

Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Michael Mendrin Well, it's better than being less flexible on rules and theorems. To me, science is like puzzle, and I like puzzles. :)

Michael Huang - 4 years, 4 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...