A = x 4 + y 4 + 6 x − y
Let x and y be real numbers. Find the minimum value of A .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice application of AM-GM to this problem, due to the nice setup of the expression.
That is a really beautiful solution ! Thank you so much ^^
Substitute x = u − v , y = u + v to find A = − 2 v 4 + 6 + 2 u 4 + 1 2 u 2 v 2 2 v ≥ − v 4 + 3 v for v > 0 . By AM-GM we have v 4 + 1 + 1 + 1 ≥ 4 v so that − v 4 + 3 v ≥ − 0 . 2 5 with equality when v = 1 .
How do you know we must start with x = u − v , y = u + v ?
Log in to reply
I'm thinking Linear Algebra (as I always do, in the back of my mind): I'm doing a change of coordinates, a rotation-scaling, to make x − y into a single variable.
Log in to reply
So what are the steps that lead you to do these substitutions? Consider that I'm not familiar with "change of coordinates + rotation-scaling + linear algebra".
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – It's quite a "natural" substitution: u is the average of x and y , and ± v is their deviation from the average.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Where can I learn this natural substitution? From this book ?
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – From any good linear algebra text, including mine ;)
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – What keyword should I be looking for? Kernel? Spectral? Matrix? Otto? Comrade?
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Keyword to find what now?
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – This natural substitution technique.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – It's not an "official" technique, but if you understand change of coordinates well, it becomes natural ;) In my text this topic is discussed in Section 3.4, "Coordinates"
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Well, it's certainly inconvenient for me to buy that book just to read that one section. Do you have a simpler example that illustrates/uses this natural technique as well?
There is a method which is slightly more tedious than the beautiful solutions listed, but probably easier to see. Set partial derivative of A with respect to x and y=0. From this one gets 2 equations of form f(x,y)=0 which can be solved to give two possible values (1,-1) and (-1,1). Minima is observed for (-1,1)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Clearly a minimum will occur for negative x and positive y (otherwise replace x with − x and y with − y and you have a smaller value for A .
Substitute z = − x so z and y are therefore positive.
The expression becomes A = − ( z 4 + y 4 + 6 z + y )
We have that z 4 + y 4 + 6 = ( z 4 + 1 + 1 + 1 ) + ( y 4 + 1 + 1 + 1 ) ≥ 4 z + 4 y by AM-GM on the two brackets as they are both positive.
This gives: A = − ( z 4 + y 4 + 6 z + y ) ≥ − ( 4 z + 4 y z + y ) = − 0 . 2 5 with the minimum occuring when z = y = 1 giving x = − 1 , y = 1