Monopoly Dice

On a turn in the board game Monopoly, the player rolls two dice, adds the numbers thrown, and moves that number of spaces. If the dice shows the same number, it is called Doubles, and the player rolls (and moves) again. However, if a player rolls Doubles three times in one turn, he or she immediately goes to Jail without moving the third time.

For example, if a player rolls a 1 1 and 2 2 , the player moves forward 1 + 2 = 3 1 + 2 = 3 spaces and the turn is over. If a player rolls a 1 1 and 1 1 , then rolls again because of the Double and rolls a 2 2 and 2 2 , then rolls again because of the Double and rolls a 3 3 and 3 3 , the player moves forward a total of 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 = 6 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 = 6 spaces that turn (before going to jail on the third Double).

If the expected number of spaces a player will move forward on one turn is p q \frac{p}{q} where p p and q q are relatively prime integers, find p + q p + q .


The answer is 2015.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Mark Hennings
Apr 30, 2020

It is easy to check that the expected number of squares moved on a single die roll, given that that roll is a double, is 1 6 ( 2 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 10 + 12 ) = 7 \tfrac16(2 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 10 + 12) = 7 It is also possible to show that the expected number of squares moved on a single die roll, given that that roll is not a double, is also 7 7 . Thus the expected number of squares moved on a single die roll is 7 7 , independently of whether a double is rolled or not. Thus the expected number of squares moved in a Monopoly move is equal to 7 7 times the expected number of rolls in that move that result in a move of some sort. If N N is that number of rolls, then P ( N = 1 ) = 5 6 P(N=1) = \tfrac56 , while P ( N = 2 ) = 5 36 + 1 216 = 31 216 P(N=2) = \tfrac{5}{36} + \tfrac{1}{216} = \tfrac{31}{216} and P ( N = 3 ) = 5 216 P(N=3) = \tfrac{5}{216} . Recall that the probability of rolling a double is 1 6 \tfrac16 ,and N N can be equal to 2 2 if three doubles are rolled.

Thus the expected number of moves is 7 ( 5 6 × 1 + 31 216 × 2 + 5 216 × 3 ) = 1799 216 7\left(\frac56 \times 1 + \frac{31}{216} \times 2 + \frac{5}{216} \times3\right) \; = \; \frac{1799}{216} making the answer 1799 + 216 = 2015 1799 + 216 = \boxed{2015} .

David Vreken
May 2, 2020

The expected value of rolling one die is 1 6 ( 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 ) = 7 2 \frac{1}{6}(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6) = \frac{7}{2} , so the expected value of rolling two dice is 2 7 2 = 7 2 \cdot \frac{7}{2} = 7 .

Of the 6 2 = 36 6^2 = 36 combinations of rolling two dice, there are 6 6 possible doubles, for a probability of 6 36 = 1 6 \frac{6}{36} = \frac{1}{6} .

Therefore, the first roll you can expect a 7 7 , and 1 6 \frac{1}{6} of the time you will have doubles and expect another 7 7 , and 1 6 \frac{1}{6} of that 1 6 \frac{1}{6} of the time you will have two doubles at a 5 6 \frac{5}{6} probability that you won't have a third double and expect another 7 7 , so that

E = 7 + 1 6 7 + 1 6 1 6 5 6 7 = 1799 216 E = 7 + \frac{1}{6} \cdot 7 + \frac{1}{6} \cdot \frac{1}{6} \cdot \frac{5}{6} \cdot 7 = \frac{1799}{216}

This means that p = 1799 p = 1799 , q = 216 q = 216 , and p + q = 2015 p + q = \boxed{2015} .

Hi, great solution but how do you convert it to a fraction?

Mario Dietrich - 1 year ago

Log in to reply

Not sure if you're asking about the math or the display, but math-wise you find a common denominator and add, and display-wise it's latex \frac{1799}{216}.

David Vreken - 1 year ago

Log in to reply

oh sorry, yeah I know how to add fractions but I thought we have to get prime numbers, I didn't understand: "p and q are relatively prime integers" Thanks

Mario Dietrich - 1 year ago

Log in to reply

@Mario Dietrich Oh, "relatively prime" means that the two numbers have no common factor. Basically it's a fancy way of writing "simplify the fraction as much as possible"

David Vreken - 1 year ago

Log in to reply

@David Vreken Thanks, now I get it

Mario Dietrich - 1 year ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...