k = 1 ∑ 3 2 tan 2 ( 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
That is a good way to find polynomials whose roots have a nice trigonometric interpretation.
You do realise that the answer is in the title.
Log in to reply
Yes, of course....otherwise the title would not make any sense ;)
Synopsis : We rearrange the terms and notice that the tangent of all 3 2 × 2 = 6 4 angles of are undefined. Then we take advantage of the fact that tan ( 6 4 x ) is undefined at all these 64 angles. We apply the generalized compound angle formula and Vieta's formula to finish it off.
Let P denote the sum in question, we apply one of the trigonometric periodicity identities : tan ( x ) = − tan ( π − x ) ⇒ tan 2 ( x ) = tan 2 ( π − x ) . Then,
P P + P 2 P = = = k = 1 ∑ 3 2 tan 2 ( π − 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) = k = 1 ∑ 3 2 tan 2 ( 1 2 8 ( 1 2 9 − 2 k ) π ) = k = 3 3 ∑ 6 4 tan 2 ( 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) k = 1 ∑ 3 2 tan 2 ( 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) + k = 3 3 ∑ 6 4 tan 2 ( 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) k = 1 ∑ 6 4 tan 2 ( 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π )
Note that for k = 1 , 2 , 3 , … , 6 4 , the value of tan ( 6 4 ⋅ 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) is undefined. So we're interested to construct a expression for tan ( 6 4 x ) such that when it is expressed in its simplest fraction form, the denominator is equal to 0.
Now, for the generalized compound angle formula for the tangent function (currently not in the wiki provided):
tan ( 6 4 x ) = 1 − e 2 + e 4 − ⋯ + e 6 4 e 1 − e 3 + e 5 − ⋯ − e 6 3
where e m denote the m th symmetric sum of tan ( 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) , where k = 1 , 2 , 3 , … , 6 4 . Knowing that e m = ( m 6 4 ) ( tan x ) m , and we're only interested in the denominator,
0 = 1 − ( 2 6 4 ) tan 2 x + ( 4 6 4 ) tan 4 x − ⋯ − ( 6 2 6 4 ) tan 6 2 x + ( 6 4 6 4 ) tan 6 4 x .
By Vieta's formula ,
2 P 2 P 2 P P = = = = k = 1 ∑ 6 4 tan 2 ( 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) [ k = 1 ∑ 6 4 tan ( 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) ] 2 − 2 ⎣ ⎡ 1 ≤ j < k ≤ 6 4 ∑ 6 4 tan ( 1 2 8 ( 2 j − 1 ) π ) tan ( 1 2 8 ( 2 k − 1 ) π ) ⎦ ⎤ = ( − 0 ) 2 − 2 ⋅ [ − ( 6 2 6 4 ) ] = 6 4 ⋅ 6 3 3 2 ⋅ 6 3 = 2 0 1 6 .
Good approach taken.
Yes, this looks like a solid approach! (+1)
I did it in a similar way, with slight variations. My approach is to show that S ( n ) = k = 0 ∑ n − 1 tan 2 ( 2 n k π ) = 3 ( n − 1 ) ( 2 n − 1 )
The sum we seek is then S ( 6 4 ) − S ( 3 2 ) = 2 0 1 6 .
To derive the formula for S ( n ) , consider the equation ( e 2 n k π i ) 2 n = ( − 1 ) k , expand the LHS in terms of cos and sin, take the imaginary part, and divide by cos 2 ( 2 n k π ) to find ∑ j = 0 n − 1 ( 2 j + 1 2 n ) ( i tan ( 2 n k π ) ) 2 n − 2 j = 0 or ∑ j = 0 n − 1 ( 2 j + 1 2 n ) ( − tan 2 ( 2 n k π ) ) n − j = 0 . Thus we have found a polynomial, ∑ j = 0 n − 1 ( 2 j + 1 2 n ) ( − 1 ) n − j x n − j whose roots are tan 2 ( 2 n k π ) for k = 0 , . . n − 1 . By Viete, the sum of these roots is S ( n ) = ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 2 n ) = 3 ( n − 1 ) ( 2 n − 1 )
Log in to reply
Another roots of unity solution? Please post solution! haha
Log in to reply
I expanded my solution above, skipping a few routine steps though... hope that will suffice
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – You should post that as a solution, not as a comment.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – ok will do if you insist, Comrade
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I used an approach similar to Comrade Pi Han Goh's, but with some variations. We will show that S ( n ) = k = 0 ∑ n − 1 tan 2 ( 2 n k π ) = 3 ( n − 1 ) ( 2 n − 1 )
The sum we seek is S ( 6 4 ) − S ( 3 2 ) = 2 0 1 6 .
To derive the formula for S ( n ) , consider the equation ( e 2 n k π i ) 2 n = ( − 1 ) k , expand the LHS in terms of cos and sin, take the imaginary part, and divide by cos 2 ( 2 n k π ) to find ∑ j = 0 n − 1 ( 2 j + 1 2 n ) ( i tan ( 2 n k π ) ) 2 n − 2 j = 0 or ∑ j = 0 n − 1 ( 2 j + 1 2 n ) ( − tan 2 ( 2 n k π ) ) n − j = 0 . Thus we have found a polynomial, ∑ j = 0 n − 1 ( 2 j + 1 2 n ) ( − 1 ) n − j x n − j whose roots are tan 2 ( 2 n k π ) for k = 0 , . . n − 1 . By Viete, the sum of these roots is S ( n ) = ( 1 2 n ) ( 3 2 n ) = 3 ( n − 1 ) ( 2 n − 1 )