In the above diagram, a charged particle is moving in an electric field, where the dotted red lines are equipotential lines. The charged particle is initially entered with a speed of
v
from the left of point
A
. Then it passes points
A
and
B
, finally arriving at point
C
. It stops for a moment there at point
C
, and then starts to move back to point
A
. Which of the following statements is correct?
a) The charged particle is negatively charged.
b) The magnitude of the kinetic energy when the charged particle passes point
B
is half the kinetic energy when the charged particle passes point
A
.
c) The force acting on the charged particle at point
C
is not zero.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
the motion of the charged particle resembles that of a pendulum where the kinetic energy is max at the mean position and a restoring force acts at the extreme position.
c) has to be true because of Newton's first law: if the force were zero, the particle would not stop and then move backwards again.
Frequency depends on distance..it gives d answer
the electrostatic potential at c is zero......in the figure....how is it possible????
Log in to reply
Did you mean at B? Why wouldn't it be possible? Also, it isn't like every theoretical problem in physics is taken from real scenarios. Some are purely theoretical to understand certain concepts. There are so many problems where you have to ignore friction or air resistance, for example.
e.p. at c is 6 v
how force at c is zero?
h
I think the answer is only C. Initial kinetic energy of the particle is KE. Let us say it is 10 units . As the particle moves from A to B it looses energy. This loss in energy is due to the work done on it as it moves from lower to higher potential. Let this work be 6 units ( assuming a unit charge ). Then the kinetic energy at B is 4 units ( which is not half the initial KE )
Log in to reply
at pnt a there is attraction btwn moving charge (with v) & steady charge which is against the motion and at c there is repulson which is acting in opposite to motion & in given problem charge stops at c so seeing this there is lost of half ke at pnt b due to that moving charge stops at c
Log in to reply
It is understood that there is loss in energy but, how can we say EXACTLY HALF !
Log in to reply
@Vijaykiran Vemuri – From the figure, we can consider or ASSUME that the equipotentials are due to resultant of two equal charges as the equipotentials seem to be symmetric about B and potential at B=0 V... so clearly B is midway between the two charges.... suppose the charge on the particle is 'q'....since conservation of energy holds true here so...total energy(E) at "A'=K.E(A)+(-6)q=E total energy at 'B'=K.E(B)+0q=K.E(B)=E total energy at 'C'=0+6q=E from this we have K.E(A)=12q... K.E(B)=6q which is half of K.E at A
Can anybody please explain how option (b) is correct. I could only decipher about option (c).
Log in to reply
In reply to Vijaykiran Vemuri: at pnt a there is attraction btwn moving charge (with v) & steady charge which is against the motion and at c there is repulson which is acting in opposite to motion & in given problem charge stops at c so seeing this there is lost of half ke at pnt b due to that moving charge stops at c
hte electronic potential at is c zero ...... the figure howw to possible ?????
the option given is force at c is non zero
the charge of particle may be positive
Hello guys! I want to poo and wee and show you my stepmothers BOOOOOOOOOOOBIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
kindly justify option c
Log in to reply
if force at c is zero than moving charge wouldnt stop at c due to its KE soforce at c is not zero
C) is confirmed as it ws given tht d particle moved towards a .....it cn either be possible that point c gives d particle a repulsive force or it might be the attractive force by point a on d particle
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The correct answer is b and c. The answer lies in the question. As the particle went back after reaching point a it does meant that some kind of opposite force is acting. So the particle is positively charged. Again it is attracted at point A by the negative charge so the kinetic energy becomes half. And at point C a repulsion force acts.