The figure shows 3 glasses filled with water and 3 empty glasses (top of figure).
With just your hands, what is the minimum number of glasses you have to pick up in order to make the bottom arrangement?
Note: No sliding of glasses is allowed. You can pour the water from one glass to another.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I would say 2 glasses, the one you move foward (filled) and the one you take back(empty) so that by my count are two glasses.
Log in to reply
Note that you only touch 1 glass, and pour the water into another.
Log in to reply
The problem is incorrectly stated. Move how? what is considered a valid movement?
Log in to reply
@Manoel Abranches – I agree. Nowhere in the problem does it expicitly state that you have to pour the water into the glasses
Log in to reply
@Devanshi Shah – It also doesn't say you can't pour water into the glass. Remember, this is about using logic and creativity.
Log in to reply
@Sam Peebles – If water is poured into a glass, that glass would, in a molecular sense, "move", or react. The issue with this word problem is the lack of definition. We could even say all the glasses will be moved, as all molecules are in constant motion. But I'm fine with the answer being one.
@Devanshi Shah – It is called thinking outside the box. Think of every possible movement you could make without sliding them
Log in to reply
@Madison Mahana – Ok I will suck the water out from a straw and then spit it in a empty glass. Then the awenser is 0... you can not tell me I am wrong the rules said do not slide. You said think outside the box.. I did... you cant say I have no straw. The question did not mention that I have no tools. If you say I am wrong I can not use a staw then you are wrong by saying you can pour it. Both of these scenarios have the same support in the question, IT DOES NOT MENTION THAT YOU CAN OR CANOT DO IT.
Log in to reply
@Andre Kleynhans – It says "With just your hands, ..." So using your hands to pour the water is valid, but using a straw is not.
@Manoel Abranches – Lifting and pouring is done by moving the glass
Well I thought it wasn't allowed to pour the water
Yes I am afraid it was not mentioned that you can pour water from glas to glas. If you can do it without them saying you cant, then I can suck it up with a straw and spit it out in empty glass and do it with 0 touches.
Log in to reply
@Andre Kleynhans – You could do that with your hands only? I’m impressed.
But it’s not clear enough! I can’t tell wether you pick up the empty glass or not, or if you can only pour water into cups next to each-other! I don’t know, it’s poorly stated! 1! (That’s a math pun... I need to stop.)
Log in to reply
@Dylan Daniel – Of course it doesn’t say outright(it does in the notes though) that you can pour water! It’s meant to make you think outside the box, not give you the method and the answer with it! It just never says you can not. In these puzzles you should be creative.
Question asks for MINIMUM number of glasses to be moved.
Log in to reply
Exactly, the so;solution given is very incorrect. I maintain that 3 need to be moved.
Log in to reply
@Adam Gorny – I believe that the idea behind a logic problem such as this is to encourage the reader to "think outside the box" and find the "clever solution."
If we assume that the water must not change glasses then yes, at the VERY LEAST we must swap Glass #2 and Glass #5, thus moving TWO glasses.
However, it was not expressly stated that the water must remain in its original glass, so we can make no such assumption. Therefore we can safely say that simply pouring the water from Glass #5 into Glass #2 and returning it to its original place will satisfy the outlined conditions.
With this, we can conclude that the MINIMUM number of glasses that must be moved is ONE.
Log in to reply
@Nate Clegg – But if we really think outside the box, it can be done with no movement whatsoever. Just take a straw...I know it is not in the problem statement, but that is one of the main aspects of "outside-the-box" problems.
Log in to reply
@Alija Bevrnja – With a long straw you could connect #2 and #5, suck until waters pours into #2 and let gravity and airpressure do the rest.
With a short straw, suck water from #5 and spit it in #2.
No glass was moved.
Log in to reply
@Bent. O. Jensen – It says 'using just your hands' so no straw allowed, sorry
Log in to reply
@Afonso Carvalho – Afonso Carvalho: You are right no straws allowed
@Bent. O. Jensen – Gravity feed requires the supply hose end be lower than the demand hose end.
@Bent. O. Jensen – Siphoning requires one glass to be lower.
Log in to reply
@Tony Greene – So does pouring... Plus you're assuming not even one molecule is left. You cannot assume you can't pour the water, however you cannot assume you can either. You're given the impression that the state of the cup must be full or empty. The logical answer is two. Move is very vague also, do you mean lift or slide. One definition of logic is: reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity. That implies a lack of room for creativity. The rules must be clear.
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – To pour is allowed, which implicit allows drops of water to be left in the empty glass.
@A Former Brilliant Member – If it never says you can’t and it’s this ‘creative’ type of puzzle, then assume you can. If they give you the method, they are basically giving you the answer.
@Tony Greene – You are right too, Siphoning would stop when water level is equal
@Tony Greene – You don't need to let gravity do the work. You can suck it up through a long straw, then release it over the other cup.
@Alija Bevrnja – but problem clearly states only use of hands
@Nate Clegg – The only problem with your statement is that thinking outside of the box is the antithesis of logical thinking. Logical thinking is done based on precise rules and instructions in this problem the instructions were neither precise or clear which is why those constrained to logical thinking find this problem problematic. Thinking outside of the box is lateral thinking, ie choosing to ignore the precisely laid out rules and instructions in favour of a more expedient answer, which is why there is a large discussion forum for this problem
@Nate Clegg – make sense to me now
@Nate Clegg – How about I suck the water out and spit in in the empty glas. Zero moves then. The question did not mention that I have no tool to help me. The Question did not say I can not do it! That is thinking outside the box.
@Nate Clegg – Exactly. it is a logical question
@Nate Clegg – We have a winner!
@Adam Gorny – Only 2, move the 2nd and 5th
@Adam Gorny – By that logic its still only two you just swap the middle empty with middle filled
That's what I had also
But what you can do to touch 1 glass is to take the top 2nd and ( without touching the "bottom" 5th) pour it into the 5th!
Bah. Granted that it would likely ruin the problem if this were stated, but it was never stated that it was fair to pour one glass into another. I answered on the assumption that one must move a full glass to place it in another position.
It's very clever, but it's a trick question, and logic ain't about trick questions, folks. This is more suited to a category called "riddles" or something.
Log in to reply
It WAS stated. Look at it again, they said no sliding but you can pour from one to another.
Log in to reply
I don't think it was stated at the time he posted. Notes can get added to make a problem clearer to everybody, and now with that note added it is obvious a lot of these old replies no longer make any sense...
Notes... They exist... ! Read them...
Or perhaps "sour grapes"? I'm just saying...
nobody noticed u can do such a thing and still there will be some small amount of water left in glass u poured from, and glass that have been poured into would have reduced amount of water... to conclude... u would have 4 glasses of water, cuz u cant take every drop of the glass out so solution must be 2... Making a number 1 true answear kinda breaks a point of this task...
Log in to reply
It never states that only 3 glasses contain water in the second picture; just that such was the case in the first.
You will still have a small amount of water left in the original glass that the water was in before.
One would would be correct, if one were to automatically assume we can just dump one of the glasses into another. The problem does not specify what exactly you can do with each glass other than pick it up. So at first I figured that you were only supposed to move them linearly along the line moving one glass at a time, which would be 3. If you were to pick them up and just move them to where they go, 2 moves. Since the problem did not specify what all we could do, except pick up the glass, it places limits on what we should be doing. Clarification needs added so as not to impose the limits of just picking up the glass and moving it when we can change one glass from being empty to full and another from full to empty.
This is not fair when the wording is incorrect... :P
I suggest to move 4 glasses, 2 from left and 2 from right. In this case only 2 glasses will remain but arrangement will be same as in bottom :)
If you can pour you can also sip. So get a straw and get a mouthful of water and then spit it into glass number 2. Repeat until done. No glasses moved!
The question never mentioned we can pour the water. Also, if we pour the water into the glass, then we don't actually 'move' the 5th glass from its original position. Do we? So this answer should be invalid. Or even the question can be invalid since it did not mention the situation carefully.
Log in to reply
Only limits is "no sliding" and "with just your hands"... "pick up". It is nowhere forbidden to pour. It allows anything you can do only using hands and glasses.
Um yes it did
It definitely said you can pour the glasses, just no sliding
How yo answer on the question?
For myself. I's like thank 5 minute craft for helping me solve this
Seriously this question is a little bit crap cuz: You only have to move 1 cup in 'minimum' but technically the minimum is 0
seriously -_- that was crap, you didn't tell me i could pour the damn water. That's why i put 2 because i thought i would have to switch them, and i only had one chance left since i randomly put in 0 and 4 first :I .
Log in to reply
If you started by randomly picking answers you can't complain :P I agree the problem isn't fair, but your complaint is, well...
The answer would have to be determined by the verb "move". To pick the 5th glass up and pour it into the 2nd glass and then set it back down into the 5th position, you did not "move" the glass... It remained in position 5.
It does say how many do you need to move it says how many you need to pick up. There is a difference
You need to recheck your definition of move. What you described sounded like an awful lot of moving to me.
what? you already moved it if you picked it up...
This is a bad question - it says no sliding glasses around, which makes you believe you cannot pick a glass up off the table + carry it over to the 5th glass + pour it out + go back + set the empty glass down. Leads you to believe you need to keep the glasses in order and pour a full 1 into an adjacent empty glass + continue... Guess we r doing riddles + not logic
Take the 5 t h glass, pour contents in 2 n d glass, place back the 5 t h glass.
Alternatively, take the 5 t h glass, drink contents, place back the 5 t h glass, pour water onto the 2 n d glass. Yes, this is a joke to break the monotony of solutions.
There needs to be a voting system to take out problematic questions such as this one. The vague wording makes the answer very difficulty to logically deduce. First I said 2, assuming that the water could not be transferred. I then said zero, because if the water can be transferred, why not just use a straw to suck the water out and spit it into the other glass? Unfortunately, by clarifying rules to ensure that 1 is the only valid answer, you would also giveaway the "thinking outside the box" aspect of this question. That makes this question extremely problematic.
it says using only your hands
The correct answer is 2. How could it be 1? If it's anything like Dilroop Singh said, then just siphon the water however you want it, and let the correct answer be 0, I mean, it's not forbidden by the description to exchange water as well as using any equipment to siphon the water out, right? There is apparently no moderators here. And while the questions have no credibility, you dare to tell people if they're correct and tell them "oh it's okay, only how many percentage of people get this right". So ironic especially in the logic section.
didn't see this before i wrote my answer - but i agree
it says using only your hands
There is nothing wrong with this question.
It does not say you have to move, only pick up, the glasses. It says you are not allowed to slide. It does not say you cannot pour.....It asks how many you have to pick up.
All you have to do is pick up the 5th glass (2nd from right), pour the contents into the 2nd glass (from left), and put the glass back down in it's original position.....which means you only have to pick up one glass.
Therefore the answer is 1.
Uea they did not say it is allowed so I can suck up the water in a straw and spit it out in the the second glass. Wich means I picked up nothing.... there is nothing wrong by doing that! They did not say it is not allowed!
Log in to reply
So you have a straw for a hand? Otherwise you aren’t only using your hands.
he he ,i got it from adaalat. just pick the 5th glass and pour the water in 2nd glass.just only 1 move.
Answer is1 . Not 3,24,6 . Lowest common multiple cannot seem to work , I think is highest common factor.
The question should say instead: "What is the least number of glasses you need to TOUCH in order to get the solution?"
How did people fail this??? Pour cup 5 into cup 2 (counting from left to right)
Maybe not exactly with this puzzle, but one of the main reasons is probably nitpicking. It's actually good to do so, as picking holes in wrong formulation of something is very logical to do. Even I sometimes like to be "too logical" and pick the answer that is "right", but is different from the intended one... which in many cases is actually justified, as people often miss something or phrase it incorrectly. Pointing out and emphasizing such mistakes can actually be very beneficial, but once again, I am generalizing here.
The problem gets simple when they allow you to pour water from one glass to another.
Just take the 5th (second last glass) and pour it into your second glass (which is empty). Put the fifth glass back where it was, and now you have every other glass filled and only touched one cup.
Its so simple. I got this from the aha! book. Just pour the contents from glass 5 into glass 2.
Use the glass in the middle (filled with water) to pour the water to the second glass.
Take the second last glass and pour the water in the second glass.Easy
i would take the bottom glass and pour the water from it into the middle glass
From scenario 1, take the 2nd glass with water and pour the water into the 2nd glass with no water.
just pour glass 5 into glasss 2
Pick up the 5th glass (from left) and pour the water into 2nd one. Then keep it back in its original (5th)position.
Pour the water from the 2nd right glass into the 2nd left one.
The 5th glass pour to the 2nd one
Pick up 5th glass then pour it into 2nd glass. Thus the answer is 1
You pour the middle full glass in the the middle empty glass
the solution is one . answer : pick up 5th glass and pour it into 2nd
These kind of questions aren't why I come to the site, if I wanted questions that are just intentionally misleading and worded vaguely to try and fool people I would go to Facebook. Implement a voting system for questions that are submitted like this so we can avoid these kinds of bar questions.
Pick up the 5th glass and pour its water in the 2nd glass and put the glass back. We only have touched 1 glass
So easy.
Pour the water from the 5th glass unto the 2nd glass.
put the 5th glass back.
moved one glass and done.
In my eyes, this answer for this is wrong as this problem is stated and its impossible to do it by these directions without picking up and swapping 2 cups. I think it's cheating to pour it out of one glass to another. It says you can only use your hands to pick up the cups and to pour something is more than just picking it up. I know in the notes it says you can pour but If we are allowed to manipulate the situation however we want like this, then the answer is 0 because you don't have to pick up any glasses to get it in that order. Using only my hands I could pick up a syringe and suck the water out of one cup into another actually never picking up a cup. I could put a string in the fifth cup and open my windows to let the water freeze pulling the water out and moving it to the second spot. There are multiple ways of doing it and still upholding the rules as stated. So no matter what, this answer for this is wrong in my eyes. Questions this vaque are left up to too much interpretation and can never have one absolute answer. When it is left up to a person to use his own imagination to solve a problem, things can get very far off from the intended problem the way the author meant it to be. Even though to give too many hints or notes would ultimately be giving the solution and no problem to solve, there has to be clearer stated set of rules.
please remove this spam, along with the user altogether, if possible
You pour the fifth glass into the second one thus only picking up one glass.
Pick a second left glass and pour the second left glass
Pick up the second last glass of first row.Pour the water in second and keep the glass again.
drink the water from the 5th glass, put back the 5th glass, spit out the water into the 2nd glass, and your'e
My first answer is 2, but since I wondered that nobody told me that pouring isn't allowed, I tried 1 next...
Who knew that you could just pour the water to another glass?
Most of us did not know
2 if you don't want to spill any, 1 if you know how to be careful enough.
using the same logic to move 1 glass (IE the water doesnt have to stay in the glass.) you could also move 0 glasses
remove water from 5th glass via vaccuum / straw into container, then pour water from container into 2nd glass
You can't get any less than zero so, I'd have to give this one to you, my friend except the rules state "only using your hands". I think the straw/vacuum combo, however "brilliant", would equate to a DQ.
the number of glasses is two. the number of switches is 1. 1 switch = 2 glasses as you cannot switch one glass for itself. You wrote the question wrong.
The answer should be 2 not 1 because we exchange position of 1 full glass and 1 empty glass?
You have to switch the 5th and the second glass. But you actually move 2 glasses! The right answer is however 1.
How to solve it is simple. There are three filled and three unfilled. Two are in the same position as the other, so you only need to move 1 glass, and put it back, and you have the same. For similar problems, let x be glasses filled in the correct position, and y be total filled. y-x. It's that simple to solve these kind of questions. Unless I'm wrong, this should work for any amount of glasses with filled cups in this format.
I do not agree. This question has two answers
I believe that the idea behind a logic problem such as this is to encourage the reader to "think outside the box" and find the "clever solution."
If we assume that the water must not change glasses then yes, at the VERY LEAST we must swap Glass #2 and Glass #5, thus moving TWO glasses.
However, it was not expressly stated that the water must remain in its original glass, so we can make no such assumption. Therefore we can safely say that simply pouring the water from Glass #5 into Glass #2 and returning it to its original place will satisfy the outlined conditions. We have only physically touched and moved ONE glass.
Thus, we can conclude that the MINIMUM number of glasses that must be moved is ONE.
Log in to reply
How about using the straw?
Log in to reply
Valid point but violates the "using your hands only" stipulation.
Log in to reply
@Ron G – Has the question been editted, I don't remember the phrase "using your hands only" when I looked at it?
Are you not assuming it's possible to drain every drop of water from a glass?
Log in to reply
Semantics.
Log in to reply
@Ron G – Yes - by pouring into one from another - these can neither be totally empty or totally full. Therefore the two glasses need to be interposed.
The original version of the question asks about the number of 'switches' needed. And the correct answer then is one. And this will be true for any two different types of items not only glasses or water.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Step 1 : Pick the 5th Glass of water and pour the water in 2nd glass.
Step 2 : Keep the glass back and it's done.
You have just moved 1 glass.