n = 2 ∑ ∞ ( ln n ) ln ( ln n ) 1
Does the series above converge or diverge?
Hint : For x ≥ 2 , ln ( x ) < x .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Good observation that ( ln n ) ln ln n < n .
How can one prove the hint that you gave?
n = n 0 ∑ ∞ f ( n ) converges iff ∫ n 0 ∞ f ( x ) d x converges. We shall consider f ( x ) = ( ln x ) ln ln x 1 .
∫ 3 ∞ ( ln x ) ln ln x 1 d x = ∫ ln 3 ∞ u ln u 1 1 / e u d u = ∫ ln 3 ∞ e u − ln 2 u d u ≥ ∫ ln 3 ∞ e u − u / 2 d u ( u / 2 ≥ ln 2 u when u > > 0 ) ≥ ∫ ln 3 ∞ e u / 2 d u
The integral diverges, and therefore so does the sum.
The integral test can only be applied if you've shown that the integrand is continuous, positive and decreasing.
Log in to reply
It is obvious f is continuous.
Let x ≥ y ≥ 3 . Then clearly ln ln x ≥ ln ln y , and so [ ln ln x ] 2 ≥ [ ln ln y ] 2 , which means that e − [ ln ln x ] 2 ≤ e − [ ln ln y ] 2 . Since f ( z ) = e − [ ln ln z ] 2 , and e x > 0 for all real x, this shows that f is both positive and decreasing.
Is this correct? Thanks for helping me ensure the rigour of my solution :)
Log in to reply
Actually, you should start off with x ≥ y ≥ 3 . Do you know why?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Right, because it is possible that ln ln z is negative between 2 and e.
Log in to reply
@Jake Lai – Right, in particular, even though ln ( ln 2 ) < ln ( ln 3 ) , we have [ ln ( ln 2 ) ] 2 > [ ln ( ln 3 ) ] 2 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We know that, ( l n ( n ) ) l n ( l n ( n ) ) = e l n ( l n ( n ) ) l n ( l n ( n ) ) = e [ l n ( l n ( n ) ) ] 2
and according to the hint, l n ( l n ( n ) ) < l n ( n )
e [ l n ( l n ( n ) ) ] 2 1 > e l n ( n ) 1 = n 1
Since ∑ 2 ∞ n 1 diverges, so does ∑ 2 ∞ ( l n ( n ) ) l n ( l n ( n ) ) 1 .