Multiple tetrahedra?

{ x + y + z = 1 x + y + z = 6 x y z = 1 x y z = 6 y z x = 1 y z x = 6 z y x = 1 z y x = 6 \begin{cases} x+y+z = 1\\ x+y+z = 6\\ x-y-z = 1\\ x-y-z = 6\\ y-z-x = 1\\ y -z-x = 6\\ z-y-x = 1\\ z-y-x = 6\\ \end{cases}

The above equations define planes in 3 space.

How many ways can you choose four of them so that the enclosed region defines a regular tetrahedron?


Image credit: Wikiwand
2 0 2^0 2 1 2^1 2 2 2^2 2 3 2^3 2 4 2^4

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Geoff Pilling
Dec 10, 2016

Four planes enclose a regular tetrahedron if:

  • For any two of the four that you choose, the dihedral angle between them is arccos ( 1 3 ) \arccos(\frac{1}{3})
  • Not all four planes intersect at a point.

For the planes above, the first two are parallel, the third and fourth are parallel, the fifth and sixth are parallel, and the seventh and eighth are parallel, and, no two parallel planes can be part of of four that form the boundary of a regular tetrahedron.

However, it just so happens, that for the planes above, if you choose any two that aren't parallel, the dihedral angle between them is arccos ( 1 3 ) \arccos(\frac{1}{3}) .

So, you will get a regular tetrahedron if you pick the four planes as follows:

  • One from the first two
  • One from the third and fourth
  • One from the fifth and sixth
  • One from the seventh and eighth

Therefore, there are 2 2 2 2 = 2 4 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 = \boxed{2^4} ways of choosing these planes which will enclose a regular tetrahedron.

I think a much better way of presenting this solution is as follows:

  1. Claim: A (regular) tetrahedron is formed by 4 planes if and only if {insert condition here}
  2. From the conditions, this implies that we must have X.

For example, in your solution, it doesn't (yet) explain why no other combination of 4 planes would work.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

There I've cleaned it up a bit.

Geoff Pilling - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Great! You can now use "regular tetrahedron" everywhere in the solution.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Good point... Done.

Geoff Pilling - 4 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...