Mysterious points on an angle bisector

Geometry Level 3

In the figure, A B C \triangle ABC is isosceles with B A C = 10 0 \angle BAC=100^\circ . Points P P and Q Q lie on the angle bisector of A C B \angle ACB , in such a way that P B C = 3 0 \angle PBC=30^\circ and A P = C Q AP=CQ . Evaluate A Q P \angle AQP in degrees.

C h a l l e n g e \rm \red{Challenge} : Make no use of trigonometry.


The answer is 30.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

5 solutions

Mark Hennings
Dec 1, 2020

Suppose that A B = A C = 1 AB = AC = 1 . Then B C = 2 sin 5 0 = 2 sin 13 0 BC = 2\sin50^\circ = 2\sin130^\circ and so, using the Sine Rule, P C = 2 sin 3 0 = 1 PC = 2\sin30^\circ = 1 . Thus A P C APC is isosceles, and hence A P C = 8 0 \angle APC = 80^\circ , A P B = 15 0 \angle APB = 150^\circ . and hence P A B = 2 0 \angle PAB = 20^\circ . Thus we deduce that triangles P A B PAB and Q C A QCA are congruent, and hence A Q C = 15 0 \angle AQC = 150^\circ , so that θ = 3 0 \theta= \boxed{30^\circ} .

For where you wrote A C = 2 cos 50 ° = 2 sin 130 ° AC = 2 \cos 50° = 2 \sin 130° , did you mean B C = 2 sin 50 ° = 2 sin 130 ° BC = 2 \sin 50° = 2 \sin 130° ?

David Vreken - 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

Oops, yes!

Mark Hennings - 6 months, 1 week ago

Hi Mark! I cannot quite follow. Can you check any typos in " A C = 2 cos 50 = 2 sin 130 AC=2\cos 50{}^\circ =2\sin 130{}^\circ "? In which triangle do you use Sine Rule?

Thanos Petropoulos - 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

Try triangle B P C BPC , with angles 13 0 130^\circ , 3 0 30^\circ , 2 0 20^\circ .

Mark Hennings - 6 months, 1 week ago

A C AC already corrected to B C BC .

Mark Hennings - 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

I believe the cos 50 ° \cos 50° that's written with B C BC should be sin 50 ° \sin 50° instead.

David Vreken - 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@David Vreken This will teach me to type a solution in two minutes before a lesson...

Mark Hennings - 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@Mark Hennings LOL! I've done that before!

David Vreken - 6 months, 1 week ago

Consider Triangle BPC and its circumcenter O. Since angle BPC is 130°, its circum-radius will be CP. With BPC = 130°, arc BC should be 50 deg, and will form 100 deg at centre O. Triangle OBC is congruent to triangle ABC. Hence OC=OB=AB=AC=CP. Triangle APC is isosceles, hence angle CAP=80° and Angle PAB= 20°. Triangle BAP and ACQ are congruent. We get angle AQP=30­°

Ajit Athle - 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

How do you know that if angle BPC is 130°, that its circumradius will be CP?

David Vreken - 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

You could say that C P CP subtends an angle of 3 0 30^\circ at the circumference of the circumcircle of P B C PBC , so it subtends an angle of 6 0 60^\circ at the centre of the circumcircle, which means that O C P OCP will be equilateral, and hence C P = R CP = R . This would give @Thanos Petropoulos his trig-free proof.

Mark Hennings - 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@Mark Hennings Okay, thanks!

David Vreken - 6 months, 1 week ago

@Mark Hennings After your clarifications, it certainly does. Thanks Mark!

Thanos Petropoulos - 6 months, 1 week ago

Also, is there a typo in OA = OB = AB = AC = CP? Should OA be OC instead?

David Vreken - 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

Yes, though all we need is C P = O C = A C CP = OC = AC . That A B AB and O B OB are also the same is true, but unimportant.

Mark Hennings - 6 months, 1 week ago

Thank you @Ajit Athle - This is a purely geometric proof. I add here a diagram which hopefully visualizes your idea. Perhaps, instead of “Since angle BPC is 130°” it should say “”Since angle PBC is 30°, angle POC is 60°” as @Mark Hennings has commented. @David Vreken is also right, there is a typo in “OA = OB = AB = AC = CP”: instead of OA it should be OC.

Thanos Petropoulos - 6 months, 1 week ago

Thanks Thanos

Ajit Athle - 6 months ago
Maria Kozlowska
Dec 2, 2020

Let A D AD and P E PE be perpendicular to B C BC , P F PF perpendicular to A D AD , and B P = 1 BP = 1 . Then P E = B P sin 3 0 = 1 2 PE = BP \cdot \sin 30^\circ = \dfrac 12 and B E = B P cos 3 0 = 3 2 BE=BP\cdot \cos 30^\circ = \dfrac {\sqrt 3}2 . And

B C = B E + E C = 3 2 + P E cot 2 0 = 3 2 + 1 2 tan 7 0 Let t = tan 1 0 = 3 2 + 3 + t 2 ( 1 3 t ) = 3 t 1 3 t B D = B C 2 = 3 t 2 ( 1 3 t ) P F = E D = B D B E = 3 t 2 ( 1 3 t ) 3 2 = t 1 3 t A D = B D tan 4 0 = B D cot 5 0 = 3 t 2 ( 1 3 t ) 1 + 3 t 3 t = 1 + 3 t 2 ( 1 3 t ) A F = A D F D = A D P E = 1 + 3 t 2 ( 1 3 t ) 1 2 = 3 t 1 3 t tan P A F = P F A F = t 3 t = 1 3 P A F = 3 0 \begin{aligned} BC & = BE + EC = \frac {\sqrt 3}2 + PE \cdot \cot 20^\circ = \frac {\sqrt 3}2 + \frac 12 \tan 70^\circ & \small \blue{\text{Let }t=\tan 10^\circ} \\ & = \frac {\sqrt 3}2 + \frac {\sqrt 3 + t}{2(1-\sqrt 3t)} = \frac {\sqrt 3-t}{1-\sqrt 3 t} \\ \implies BD & = \frac {BC}2 = \frac {\sqrt 3-t}{2(1-\sqrt 3t)} \\ PF & = ED = BD - BE = \frac {\sqrt 3-t}{2(1-\sqrt 3t)} - \frac {\sqrt 3}2 = \frac t{1-\sqrt 3 t} \\ AD & = BD \cdot \tan 40^\circ = BD \cdot \cot 50^\circ = \frac {\sqrt 3-t}{2(1-\sqrt 3t)} \cdot \frac {1+\sqrt 3t}{\sqrt 3 - t} = \frac {1+\sqrt 3t}{2(1-\sqrt 3t)} \\ AF & = AD - FD = AD - PE = \frac {1+\sqrt 3t}{2(1-\sqrt 3t)} - \frac 12 = \frac {\sqrt 3t}{1-\sqrt 3t} \\ \tan \angle PAF & = \frac {PF}{AF} = \frac t{\sqrt 3 t} = \frac 1{\sqrt 3} \\ \implies \angle PAF & = 30^\circ \end{aligned}

This means that B A P = B A D P A F = 5 0 3 0 = 2 0 \angle BAP = \angle BAD - \angle PAF = 50^\circ - 30^\circ = 20^\circ . Then A B P \triangle ABP and A C Q \triangle ACQ are congruent and C A Q = A B P = 1 0 \angle CAQ = \angle ABP = 10^\circ . And A Q P = C A Q + A C Q = 1 0 + 2 0 = 30 \angle AQP = \angle CAQ + \angle ACQ = 10^\circ + 20^\circ = \boxed{30}^\circ .

Another ingenious solution! Yet, I challenge you to a solution without trigonometry.

Thanos Petropoulos - 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

I was trying but of no avail.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 6 months, 1 week ago
Elijah L
Dec 2, 2020

This is more so a solution sketch rather than a solution, but I tried to solve it without the use of trigonometry.

The crucial claim is that A Q C B P A \triangle AQC \cong \triangle BPA . We have information that A C = A B AC = AB and A P = Q C AP = QC . If we determine that B A P = A C Q \angle BAP = \angle ACQ or B P = A Q BP = AQ , then we determine that the triangles are congruent.

If we can prove that these triangles are congruent, we can deduce that B A Q = 9 0 \angle BAQ = 90^\circ . Combined with the fact that A P Q = 6 0 \angle APQ = 60^\circ , then we can show that θ = 3 0 \theta = \boxed{30^\circ} .

Naufal Fadil
Nov 30, 2020

How do you know that A B P = C A Q \angle ABP=\angle CAQ ?

Thanos Petropoulos - 6 months, 1 week ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...