The angle of projection that gives the maximum horizontal range of a projectile, if the point of projection is at h = 1 6 0 m above the point of landing is θ for the speed of projection u = 2 0 0 m / s .
If sin θ = b a in simplified form, then find a+b?
Details :
( a , b ) are whole numbers.
a has no factor of a perfect square.
g = 1 0 m / s 2 .Neglect any other force.
Horizontal range is the horizontal component of displacement from starting point to landing point.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Yes, this problem is a bashy subset of a David Morin problem. Nicely written proof. The answer for a general case would be z = 2 + ϕ 1 , where ϕ = v 2 2 g h .
Okay, you can't really say that gcd(a,b) = 1, if a = 2 and b = 6, can't you? Better fix this.
Sorry my mistake
Log in to reply
You can edit your problem, and say that a is "square free", or "has no square factors", and drop the reference to gcd(a,b) = 1.
Log in to reply
I can't edit second time maybe moderator could help, I really made a big mistake writting that.
Log in to reply
@Tushar Gautam – Ok edited something.
Log in to reply
@Tushar Gautam – I'll report it now as being fixed.
There valid with a golden formula year 1993 for this question.
Nice one. Test for application of quadratic equation in reality as well as equation of trajectories nothing else. Simple but maths is required
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We have that (i) x = u t ∗ c o s θ and (ii) y = 1 6 0 + u t ∗ s i n θ − 5 ∗ t 2 .
From (ii) we find that, when y = 0 ,
t = ( 1 0 1 ) ∗ ( u ∗ s i n θ + u 2 ∗ s i n 2 θ + 3 2 0 0 ⟹ t = 2 ( s i n θ + s i n 2 θ + 1 6 ) ,
where I used the fact that u = 2 0 0 = 1 0 2 .
Plugging this result into (i) yields that
x = 2 0 ∗ c o s θ ( s i n θ + s i n 2 θ + 1 6 ) .
Taking the derivative of x with respect to θ yields that
d θ d x = ( s i n 2 θ + 1 6 s i n θ + 1 ) ∗ c o s 2 θ − s i n θ ( s i n 2 θ + 1 6 + s i n θ ) ,
which, after letting z = s i n θ , can be simplified to
z 2 + 1 6 z + z 2 + 1 6 ∗ ( 1 − z 2 − z z 2 − 1 6 ) .
Now since z > 0 , for the derivative to equal 0 we must have that
1 − z 2 = z z 2 + 1 6 ⟹ ( 1 − z 2 ) 2 = z 2 ( z 2 + 1 6 ) ⟹ 1 8 ∗ z 2 = 1 ⟹ z = 6 2 .
Thus a = 2 , b = 6 and a + b = 8 .