Evaluate x → 0 lim tan ( x ) sin ( x )
I urge you to tackle this problem with interesting methods because I would love to see how many different ways there are at solving this. If you have one which you see as a bizarre or unique way of solving this, feel free to post it because I would love to learn about it!
If you know multiple methods, feel free to post them all. The more, the merrier!
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Yes, the second one is out of habit for me also. I can't understand 3rd, though.
Log in to reply
The 3rd uses the imaginary expressions for sin, cos and tan. They are derived from Euler's formula e i z = cos ( z ) + i sin ( z ) . I just plugged them in for sin and tan and simplifying them gave me the imaginary expression of cos, where i plug in 0 and it pops out 1
Log in to reply
Ok, I haven't learnt complex numbers. However, the problem is good, there are multiple ways to solve!
Log in to reply
@Vinayak Srivastava – yeah that is why i like it as well. complex numbers are not too tricky once you learn about them
All I did is take the sin and cos out and performed x x = 1 ?
P.S. Same age, same country?
Log in to reply
Maybe it will work sometimes, but this method is not correct in general. If you haven't learnt differentiation, I think you should follow the first one. If you have, just use L'Hôpital's rule.
Log in to reply
I haven't learned calculus!
Log in to reply
@Yajat Shamji – I also haven't learnt much, but differentiation is useful in Physics. I would suggest you to use the first method, it is more traditional.
Log in to reply
@Vinayak Srivastava – I am not supposed to learn calculus yet!
Log in to reply
@Yajat Shamji – you can learn calculus whenever you want. there isn't any strict age limitations. i think that what he meant was that use the first method until you learn calculus which is whenever you want. Also yes same country same age lol
Log in to reply
@James Watson – No - it's because I am following my school's syllabus, that's why.
Log in to reply
@Yajat Shamji – oh. well then you can learn calculus when it appears in the syllabus then. A small portion of calculus appeared in mine but i wanted to get a firmer grip on it
Log in to reply
@James Watson – According to my syllabus, I have to wait another year!
Log in to reply
@Yajat Shamji – it must be a different syllabus then i suppose. we do differentiation and integration but it is only with the power rule so no trigonometric or logarithmic differentiation/integration. also no limits
You know a lot of maths for a 15 y/o. Cheers!
Draw a circle of radius 1 with center at O . Take two points A and B on it's circumference. Join O A and extend it to C . Draw a tangent to the circle at B meeting O C at D . Join O B , A B .
Area of △ O A B is 2 1 sin x , where
x = ∠ A O B . Area of circular sector A O B is 2 1 x ,
and area of △ O B D is 2 1 tan x
It's easy to compare these three areas to obtain sin x < x < tan x for 0 < x < 2 π
By moving the point B towards the point A along the arc of the circle, we see that as x decreases, the point D also moves towards A , these three areas become more and more close, so that when the angle is infinitesimally small, they merge totally, so that the ratio of any two of them becomes 1 :
x → 0 lim x sin x
= x → 0 lim x tan x
= x → 0 lim tan x sin x = 1 .
Nice use of geometry to solve this problem! It becomes more interesting than using algebra or calculus when geometry can be used. Upvoted!
Log in to reply
There is an easier approach using trigonometry for the ratio mentioned in the problem. Consider a right triangle △ A B C right angled at A . Let ∠ A B C = x . Then
sin x = ∣ B C ∣ ∣ A C ∣ ,
tan x = ∣ A B ∣ ∣ A C ∣
As the point C approaches the point A , x decreases and the length of B C becomes closer and closer to the length of A B , so that when x is infinitesimally small, ∣ B C ∣ ≈ ∣ A B ∣
Then sin x ≈ tan x , and the limiting value of
tan x sin x becomes 1 .
Log in to reply
I like hoe you can visualise your solutions and it can make sense just by looking at them; the fact that the ratio of the lines BC and BA almost becoming 1 can be seen really clearly! Great second method!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Here are the 3 ways that I found of doing this. I would love to see other ways posted as well if anyone knows any. Make them as bizarre as possible!
Method 1: This is a traditional way of solving this limit. It involves rewriting tangent in terms of sine and cosine.
We know that tan ( x ) ≡ cos ( x ) sin ( x ) . We can use this to our advantage: x → 0 lim tan ( x ) sin ( x ) ⟹ x → 0 lim sin ( x ) cos ( x ) sin ( x ) 1 = x → 0 lim sin ( x ) sin ( x ) cos ( x ) = x → 0 lim cos ( x ) = 1
Method 2: This is the method that I look to first; I guess it is out of habit.
We can use L'Hopital's Rule here because sin ( 0 ) = 0 and tan ( 0 ) = 0 making this a 0 0 situation; we can differentiate the top and bottom and work from there: x → 0 lim tan ( x ) sin ( x ) ⟹ x → 0 lim d x d ( tan ( x ) ) d x d ( sin ( x ) ) = x → 0 lim sec 2 ( x ) cos ( x ) = x → 0 lim cos 2 ( x ) 1 cos ( x ) ( sec ( x ) ≡ cos ( x ) 1 ) = x → 0 lim cos 3 ( x ) = 1 3 = 1
Method 3: This method is similar to method 1, but it is more bizarre which is what I would like! This uses the imaginary expressions of sine, cosine and tangent.
First, we must know that sin ( x ) ≡ 2 i e i x − e − i x , cos ( x ) ≡ 2 e i x + e − i x and tan ( x ) ≡ e i x + e − i x i ( e − i x − e i x ) where i = − 1 . Before we plug these into our limit, let us also know that e i x + e − i x i ( e − i x − e i x ) = e i x + e − i x − i ( e i x − e − i x ) because this will help us later.
Now, we can plug them in: x → 0 lim tan ( x ) sin ( x ) ⟹ x → 0 lim 2 i e i x − e − i x e i x + e − i x i ( e − i x − e i x ) 1 = x → 0 lim 2 i e i x − e − i x i ( e − i x − e i x ) e i x + e − i x = x → 0 lim 2 i e i x − e − i x i ( e − i x − e i x ) e i x + e − i x = x → 0 lim 2 i e i x − e − i x − i ( e i x − e − i x ) e i x + e − i x = x → 0 lim 2 e i x + e − i x = x → 0 lim cos ( x ) = 1
Again, if there are any more crazy ways of solving this, then please post them as a solution!