This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I didn't know about these diagrams, so thanks for posting the question. Great wiki, by the way. :)
Log in to reply
It is a very good wiki, but it's not mine! It was written by @Patrick Corn . I was inspired by it to write this question.
Log in to reply
Thanks! I wonder what the general answer is, or if there are some partial results. It's not immediately obvious how to generalize...
Log in to reply
@Patrick Corn – @Mark Hennings gives a generalization in his solution.
Does |S| mean the maximum number of elements of S I was confused what the problem was asking for (I don't understand the notation so it's really my own fault, but still)
Log in to reply
The vertical bars indicate the cardinality (size) of the set. ∣ S ∣ represents how many elements the set S has. The problem is asking for the maximum number of elements S can have.
If N is a product of m primes, then a maximal antichain for the positive integer factors of N under division is equal to
Since 2 0 1 6 = 2 5 × 3 2 × 7 , it is a product of 8 primes. A maximal antichain in F is the set of divisors of 2 0 1 6 which are products of 4 primes, namely 1 6 , 2 4 , 5 6 , 3 6 , 8 4 , 1 2 6 . Thus the answer is 6 .
Is that obvious? It looks like Sperner's theorem (and is the same as Sperner's theorem if N is the product of distinct primes), but I don't quite understand why it's true in general.
Hmm, it appears to be a theorem of DeBruijn/Tengbergen/Kruyswijk from 1951, but I don't have the reference in front of me.
Log in to reply
Indeed! It is an extension of Sperner's Theorem. The reference is
N. G. de Bruijn, Ca. van Ebbenhorst Tengbergen, and D. Kruyswijk, On the set of divisors of a number, Nieuw Arch. Wiskunde (2) 23 (1951), 191–193.
and the paper can be found here . I have changed the link, @Patrick Corn ; the old one seems to have broken.This is the authors' free access copy.
Log in to reply
What happens if there would be 2015^200 instead of 2016?Please give your solution with more details.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Below is a Hasse Diagram of the factors of 2 0 1 6 , organized by divisibility:
The subsets which satisfy the property for S contain elements that are in parallel paths in the diagram. One can see that the largest possible subset would have ∣ S ∣ = 6 . An example subset which has this property is { 3 2 , 4 8 , 7 2 , 1 1 2 , 1 6 8 , 2 5 2 } .