Solve For real x : x 3 + 1 = 2 3 2 x − 1 Where x < 0
Details and Assumptions :
Take the real cube root.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The equation can be rewritten as: 2 x 3 + 1 = 3 2 x − 1 .Now notice that R.H.S. is the i n v e r s e of L.H.S. or vice versa.Hence,solution occurs for y = x .Therefore, ⇒ 2 x 3 + 1 = x ⇒ x 3 − 2 x + 1 = 0 .On solving we get, x = 1 , 2 − 1 ± 5 .Hence only negative solution is x = 2 − 1 − 5 ≃ − 1 . 6 1
The solution need not occur on y=x. Thus, you must prove that it is the only solution.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin Do you have any example supporting my argument?
The only solutions which you can get manually are given.For other solutions (which are not present for this equation),you need to use programmable calculators e.t.c.
Log in to reply
As per the graph, there are no more solutions. But for the sake of maths, you should prove this.
Log in to reply
@Pranjal Jain – I've told you these are the only possible solutions which can be solved m a n u a l l y
Log in to reply
@Mudit Bansal – Are you really sure? 😪
Edit: How do you know others cannot be calculated m a n u a l l y
@Mudit Bansal – I think this is incorrect. If you put the value -1.61 into the equation, it will give a complex RHS and real LHS.
When a function is inverse of another, equality occurs at y=x. But not at every y=x.
Log in to reply
@Archit Boobna – Put the value x = y = 2 − 1 − 5
Log in to reply
@Pranjal Jain – A negative solution cant exist to this question. RHS will become imaginary
Log in to reply
@Archit Boobna – RHS won't become imaginary.....It is cube root there and not square root
@Archit Boobna – RHS won't become imaginary.....It is cube root there and not square root
No, you do not need calculators, as shown in my solution.
Can you please explain how they are inverse of each other Because I went on expanding it and then solved it
Log in to reply
to find the inverse of an i n v e r t i b l e f u n c t i o n just tuck in x in place of y and y in place of x,then get y again in terms of x.
'Cause I didn't realize RHS and LHS are inverses, here's my way of solving:
Let y = 3 2 x − 1 , then y 3 = 2 x − 1 , or y 3 + 1 = 2 x .
The equation now changes to this system: { x 3 + 1 = 2 y y 3 + 1 = 2 x .
Subtract the first and the second equations, we have: ( x − y ) ( x 2 + x y + y 2 ) = 2 ( y − x ) (1)
If x = y , (1) ⇔ x 2 + x y + y 2 = − 2 ⇔ ( x + 2 1 y ) 2 + 4 3 y 2 = − 2 (false for all x , y ).
So, x = y , given x 3 + 1 = 2 x . There are 3 solutions for this equation, but the only negative one is 2 − 1 − 5 .
by considering the inverse of x on both sides i found that x<0 )so i used (x=-1) i solved for x= on one side and found that divergence occurs towards a root or is that not allowed? im new to this brilliant. org thing
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let f ( x ) = 2 x 3 + 1 . Then the equation rearranges to f ( f ( x ) ) = x .
Note that f ( x ) is a strictly increasing function meaning that a < b ⟹ f ( a ) < f ( b ) where a , b are reals.
Thus,
f ( x ) > x ⟹ f ( f ( x ) ) > f ( x ) > x , f ( x ) < x ⟹ f ( f ( x ) ) < f ( x ) < x
For equality to occur, f ( x ) = x ⟹ 2 x 3 + 1 = x ⟹ x 3 − 2 x + 1 = ( x − 1 ) ( x 2 + x − 1 ) = 0
This gives the solutions 1 , 2 − 1 ± 5 . The only negative solution is 2 − 1 − 5 .