n = 0 ∑ ∞ [ 8 n + 1 1 − 8 n + 7 1 ] can be written in the form π ( c a + b ) where a , b and c are positive integers with a being square free.
What is the value of a + b + c ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Thank you for sharing.
For ∣ x ∣ < 1 consider the following geometric sequences:
1 − x 8 1 = n → ∞ lim k = 0 ∑ n x 8 k … ( 1 ) 1 − x 8 x 6 = n → ∞ lim k = 0 ∑ n x 8 k + 6 … ( 2 )
Integrating both sides with respect to x from 0 to 1 gives:
t → 1 − lim ∫ 0 t 1 − x 8 1 d x = n → ∞ lim k = 0 ∑ n 8 k + 1 1 … ( 3 ) t → 1 − lim ∫ 0 t 1 − x 8 x 6 d x = n → ∞ lim k = 0 ∑ n 8 k + 7 1 … ( 4 )
Subtracting (3) and (4) gives:
n → ∞ lim k = 0 ∑ n [ 8 k + 1 1 − 8 k + 7 1 ] = t → 1 − lim ∫ 0 t ( 1 − x 8 1 − x 6 ) d x = 8 π ( 2 + 1 )
The steps of evaluation of the right-hand side limit are left out. I will add those details if requested.
You're not quite right. The series in (3) and (4) diverge.
Log in to reply
Yes, I agree that (3) and (4) are divergent. But I don't see why subtracting two divergent series is incorrect. A linear combination of two divergent series can be convergent as is the case here.
Log in to reply
Infinity - infinity is not a valid operation. You can't perform arithmetic operation on infinity, which is not a number, but just a concept.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Okay, point taken. I have made a small adjustment to my solution. I think this addresses your concern.
Log in to reply
@Karan Chatrath – No, n = 0 ∑ ∞ 8 n + 1 1 diverges .
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – I have made a second adjustment to my solution.
@Pi Han Goh – By your argument, the problem statement can be subjected to the same kind of scrutiny.
n = 0 ∑ ∞ [ 8 n + 1 1 − 8 n + 7 1 ] = n = 0 ∑ ∞ 8 n + 1 1 − n = 0 ∑ ∞ 8 n + 7 1
Or are you telling me that:
n = 0 ∑ ∞ [ 8 n + 1 1 − 8 n + 7 1 ] = n = 0 ∑ ∞ 8 n + 1 1 − n = 0 ∑ ∞ 8 n + 7 1
The first statement amounts to ∞ − ∞ . I frankly do not see a problem with my earlier arguments because like you said, infinity is a concept and not a number. So an infinite summation essentially means summing up a large number of terms of a sequence. This, to me, is logical and it does not amount to ∞ − ∞ .
Log in to reply
@Karan Chatrath – Yes, the second ( L A T E X line) is the one I'm alluding to. It's a common misconception to express a convergent series as the sum of divergent series. See Riemann rearrangement theorem .
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – What you're basically saying is that ( a 1 − b 1 ) + ( a 2 − b 2 ) + ⋯ = ( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ ) − ( b 1 + b 2 + ⋯ ) must hold.
But this isn't true!
Take the simpler telescoping series:
n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( n 1 − n + 1 1 ) = 1
By your reasoning, you would have concluded that 1 + 2 1 + 3 1 + ⋯ is finite and is greater than 2 1 + 3 1 + 4 1 + ⋯ by exactly 1. But that's not right, because the both of these series diverge! See Is ∞ + 1 > ∞ ? .
This isnot correct solution.
Log in to reply
@Naren Bhandari – Hi, thanks for the feedback. Could you provide some specific details about my errors so that I may learn from them?
Log in to reply
@Karan Chatrath – Your very first line started with ∣ x ∣ < 1 , so your equations (3) and (4) does not hold because x = 1 does not satisfy this inequality.
You could just cut out the working for (3) and (4) and show your last step: The sum converts to an integral.
But to do justify this step, you need to use Dominated convergence theorem.
Alternatively, you could first show that each term of the series is positive, and that the series converge by p -test.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Okay, your feedback is much appreciated. Also, thanks for sharing those couple of links in your previous comments.
I thought that introducing the limits as I have, obeys the property that ∣ x ∣ < 1 . I could be more specific by saying that it is a left-hand limit. I am adding that detail to my solution as well.
Also, I am unfamiliar with the dominated divergence theorem as well as the p-test. I will read about these two subjects at my leisure and subject my solution to further scrutiny. In the meantime, you are welcome to mark my solution as confusing.
Log in to reply
@Karan Chatrath – I've submitted an alternative solution. =D
@Karan Chatrath – Also, there's a one-line solution via digamma function . Do try it out!
We can rewrite the above sum as (1-1/7)+sigma from n= 1 to infinity (1/8n-1/(8n+7))-sigma from n=1 to infinity (1/8n-1/(8n+1)) ,then recognizing that there are digamma functions hiding in both the sum we have (8/7+ digamma(1-1/8)-digamma (1/8)-8) all divided by 8 . Simplifying by using the reflection equation 1/7-1+πcot (π/8) ,since cot(π/8)=2^1/2+1. Hence we have by inputting it to the original sum, 1-1/7+1/7-1+(π(2^1/2+1)/8)=(π(2^1/2+1))/8,a=2,b=1 and c=8.Adding it gives 11 as our result.(sorry for the messy calculation.)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let us first logarithmically differentiate the Weierstrass Product : cos ( π x ) = n = 0 ∏ ∞ ( 1 − ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 4 x 2 ) to get n = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 − ( 2 x ) 2 1 = 8 x π tan ( π x ) and noticing that 8 n + 1 1 − 8 n + 7 1 = 8 3 ⋅ ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 − ( 2 ⋅ 8 3 ) 2 1
we can conclude that n = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 8 n + 1 1 − 8 n + 7 1 ) = 8 3 n = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 − ( 4 3 ) 2 1 = 8 3 ⋅ 8 ⋅ 8 3 π tan ( π ⋅ 8 3 ) = 8 π ( 1 + 2 )