If x + y + z ≤ 1 , x , y , z > 0
Find minimum of x 2 + x 2 1 + y 2 + y 2 1 + z 2 + z 2 1 Note:If the answer is 1.111111...Type 1.11
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Don't you think that Jensen's is a contrived solution like AMGM?
Haha JK, good solution as usual. Comrade Otto
Log in to reply
These inequalities are not contrived in and of themselves, but the way they are sometimes used is very contrived indeed. Here, Jensen jumps right at you. (Besides, AM-GM is a special case of Jensen, of course.)
I like Jensen's inequality because I can SEE it happen on the graph, in terms of concavity.
As an educator, I hate to see a lot of talented young people waste a lot of their time and energy on these silly inequalities rather than focusing on the important stuff: Calculus, linear algebra, etc.
Log in to reply
Hmmmm... I wonder how many inequalities you consider to be contrived here .
I'm not going to lie and say that I enjoy these inequalities. As a matter of fact, I really dislike them (even Jensen's). This is a just a preference because I can't "savor the moment". But I still can see the use and beauty of them. Can't you?
As an educator, I hate to see a lot of talented young people waste a lot of their time and energy on these silly inequalities
Are you implying that all these inequalities are completely useless? And that they are esoteric and have no real application? If yes, what other fields you consider to be useless? (I'm curious)
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Let me put it this way: The weight that certain topics (classic inequalities, Fermat's little theorem, and Newton Sums, for example) are given at Brilliant and in some math competitions is vastly different from the weight they have in mainstream higher education and in research math. In 40 years of enjoying math (as a student, teacher, and author), I have never seen anybody use "AM-GM" or "Newton Sums", for example, and Fermat only a few times.
Frankly, I don't see any beauty in contrived and "forced" math, although there may be some technical cleverness on the part of the setter and the solver of the problem. For me, mathematical beauty manifests itself in simplicity, the use of unifying concepts, surprising connections to other problems, and the use of symmetry, for example.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Maybe mainstream higher education should follow us haahahah!
Your comment resembles what Patrick Corn said in his reply to my comment . Thanks for the dialogue!
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – I'm happy to see that Patrick Corn has similar views on the subject... he is a wise man and his Erdos number is lower than mine ;)
Like Patrick, I was strongly influenced by the thinking of Comrade Alexander Grothendieck, who was my academic grand father (advisor of my advisor, Pierre Gabriel). Sadly, there has been a sharp decline in mathematical sophistication ;)
By applying result of C-S inequality: x 2 + x 2 1 + y 2 + y 2 1 + z 2 + z 2 1 ≥ ( x + y + z ) 2 + ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 ) 2 Since ( x + y + z ) ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 ) ≥ 9 x + y + z ≤ 1 ⇒ x 1 + y 1 + z 1 ≥ 9 And ( x + y + z ) 2 + 8 1 1 ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 ) 2 ≥ 9 2 ( x + y + z ) ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 ) = 2 So ( x + y + z ) 2 + 8 1 1 ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 ) 2 + 8 1 8 0 ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 ) 2 ≥ 2 + 8 1 8 0 × 8 1 = 8 2 Hence ( x + y + z ) 2 + ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 ) 2 ≥ 8 2 ≈ 9 , 0 5 The inequality hold when x = y = z = 3 1
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
If we let f ( x ) = x 2 + x 2 1 , then f ( x ) + f ( y ) + f ( z ) ≥ 3 f ( 3 x + y + z ) ≥ 3 f ( 1 / 3 ) ≈ 9 . 0 5 5 by Jensen's Inequality