True or False?
If you add a positive number to its reciprocal, then the result is always greater than or equal to 2.
x + x 1 ≥ 2
Bonus: If true, give the relevant proof; if false, explain why.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Can you conclude a statement is true just because you can derive a true statement from it?
Log in to reply
If the two statements are equivalent, then yes.
All lines in this case (positive x ) are equivalent. If x < 0 multiplying both sides by x would flip the greater or equal sign, hence the second line mentioning that x is positive.
Actually, multiplying by -1 transforms the given inequality into − x − x 1 ≤ − 2 , so by replacing − x by y we obtain y + y 1 ≤ − 2 for y < 0 .
Combining the two inequalities thus results in ∣ ∣ x + x 1 ∣ ∣ ≥ 2 for all real x = 0 .
No but this is not what was really done. Imagine each line connected by an "if and only if" symbol.
Log in to reply
I realized this when I noticed the line of reasoning works in reverse order.
Do you have that greater than/ equal to sign in your keypad?? And how to write 1/x like you wrote??
Log in to reply
Use Latex. Hover over the text to see how to enter symbols and fraction bars and more.
Log in to reply
See this LaTeX guide on how to get mathematical symbols in your solutions/problems.
You need Latex or something similar to get the fraction. On my keyboard I can get the ≥ symbol without any special code, just use alt or option plus the "." button (no shift for me).
The problem never says x is greater than 0. Just try this problem with -1, and the solution drops out of thin air
Log in to reply
The problem indicates that x is a positive number, hence greater than 0.
-1 is positive. Fair enough.
U think u shouldn't start with what u want to prove and prove it by getting a correct answer, since -1 = 1 square both sides 1 = 1; thus, we can see a false statement can get a true statement
not if you add 0.1 Pedantic but that’s the point of these
You cant just start with the conclusion perform steps until you find a true statement and call that the proof. Its a good starting point. Now reverse those steps and now you have a proof that works here.
What about x = 0.5? The equation would equal 2.5. It fails to mention whole numbers. Maybe I’m reading too far into it, but a lot of these questions ask you to do just that and it forces you to think in some unconventional ways.
Log in to reply
What about x=0.5? Well, it is a positive number. Adding it to its reciprocal does give 2.5 but the same thing happens if you start with x=2. 2.5 is greater than 2. What are you getting on about?
Actually there are many way to prove the given condition. Now I am going to prove it using AM and G.M inequality . It states that between any two numbers a , b then the realation between AM (Arithmetic Mean) and GM (geometric Mean) between a , b is that : A . M ≥ G M ⟹ 2 a + b ≥ ( a b ) 1 / 2
Coming to this question the given numbers are x , x 1 . Now,
A . M ≥ G . M A.M 2 x + x 1 ≥ G.M ( x × x 1 ) 1 / 2 2 x + x 1 ≥ 1 ( x + x 1 ) ≥ 2 ⟹ ( x + x 1 ) min = 2
Good approach!
Log in to reply
And this is the standard mathematical approach.
Log in to reply
Hey, ram Mohit, you must be knowing to speak "Telugu", isn't it?
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – Yes. I know telugu completely as I was born and was grown up in Visakhapatnam, Andra.
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Cheers! Even I know Telugu! Ippudu, ekkada unavu Ram? ( Like which place are you in now?
For your age, 15 years You're really intelligent!!! I know that schools like Narayana and Chaitanya teach 11th and 12th concepts when you're at your 7th and 8th class! Even then, you're great bro!
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – Nuuvve kuda Andra nunchi vacheva ? (Are you also from Andra ?)
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Avunu, but now I'm in Mysore!
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – Oh !!! ok From which part of Andra are you from ?
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Near Vishakhapatnam, a place called "kavali" ( my mom's town) and my father's is near "Ongole"
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – Ye school lo chaduvutunavu?
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – My school age is over !!! Now I am in Intermediate first year studying in Sri Venketeswara Classes, Visakhapatnam.
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Ohh, I never heard of "Sri Venkateswara classes". Baga untada?
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – It is an excellent collage. Did you ever heard of "Alok Sir" or any institute by the name "Paramauma" ?
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Ledu, what's the matter?
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – It's a very good institute. Chala baguntadhi !!!!
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Hmm.. great, answer to my question above.... Intresed in joining IIT right?
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – Mana Andhra lo anthe le! 😂
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – Huh, gotta go... Talk to you later, bye annaiya!
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – Sare thammudu Bye !!!
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – I'm gonna meet you some time in my life! Probably after all my studies! 😉
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – Ok !!! I too hope to meet you. By the way if you want to discuss or chat more freely you can come to Ekene Franklin's messageboard where I will be present and similar boys like you (under 14) are also present.
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Hmm... Chustha, time unte osta 😅
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – However, are you there wahatsapp?
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – Can you give me your phone number now?
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – I am not having any phone neither I am interested in having one till I get into IIT as these two years are very crucial for a student.
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Awesome! You're absolutely right! 😄
@Prem Chebrolu – No. I am not having any whatsapp or own phone.
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Then, whose phone are you using now??
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – I come to brilliant mostly through computer.
@Prem Chebrolu – Ok. No problem
@Prem Chebrolu – Yes. I want to join in one of the IIT's in south or in Delhi (or) NIT in warrangal (or) Bangalore IISc .
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Even my brother had almost the same goals, but currently he's in IIT Bhubaneswar! ( He was actually interested in computer science but joined electrical) even he uses brilliant!!! And he is a moderator, ( Sravanth Chebrolu), know him??
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – He's in 1st year, this year from July 24 the collage started, and he is coming to Mysore tomorrow!!! I'm gonna enjoy, seeing him after many days!
@Prem Chebrolu – Yes !!! I am about to ask about him to you whether he is a relative to you or not. I have seen his questions and there are quite good. But I don't know that he is a moderator !!!
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Ohhkay, he is my own brother! ,He is coming to Mysore tomorrow!! 😎 Felling awesome! And, currently my target is NTSE! Did you qualify it, in your 10th class?
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – No. As I am a ICSE student I am not aware of it well. When I came to know about it everything was over.
@Prem Chebrolu – By God's sake, I am not from Narayana and Chaitanya. There are the worst schools who can find as they teach higher concepts to such a young and immature brains of children. I am from an ICSE school.
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Hmm... Yeah but even ICSC schools are little ahead, like they teach some 11th concepts in 9th or 10th right?
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – No. ICSE schools are not like that but the subjects like History are tough in ICSE. These schools never teach anything out of syllabus. But the syllabus will be vast and there will be many lessons to study. Hence, it is little difficult to cope up but not impossible.
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – Okay.. interested in joining IIT right? Mana Andhra lo anthe le! 😎
Log in to reply
@Prem Chebrolu – You are very much true. They will think like "IIT vasta life settle aippoindhi".
Log in to reply
@Ram Mohith – I knew that 'cause many of my relatives who are in Andhra always talk about IIT! 😂 And, it's obviously very great!
Can you please explain me that how the answer has come through the green equation?
Log in to reply
As x + x 1 is always greater than 2 the minimum value is 2.
Let's assume there is a value of x which results in a number less than 2 :
x + x 1 < 2
We can rearrange this to:
x 2 − 2 x + 1 < 0
( x − 1 ) 2 < 0
No real value of x here can satisfy this equation. Therefore x + x 1 ≥ 2 .
This is just converse of Zee Ell's solution.
Proof by contradiction has always irritated me. Sure, there are only 3 possible outcomes = <> and if it's not one it's the others. There's nothing more solid than saying, "It IS greater than or equal to!"
Log in to reply
Saying "it is greater than or equal to" doesn't preclude "it is less than". Showing that the equation works for numbers greater than 2 doesn't prove that it works exclusively for numbers greater than 2.
1 + 1/2=1,5
Log in to reply
You are confused. It should be 1 + 1 1 as you are taking reciprocal and not halving it.
Maybe you mean 2+1/2
x + x 1 = b x 2 − b x + 1 = 0 By the quadratic formula: x = 2 b + b 2 − 4 The positive domain of the function above is b ≥ 2
I liked the way you thought. This one of the best ways to prove the required result and you got it. By this I think all the methods are completed namely normal square method, AM-GM inequality, derivative method and quadratic formula method.
I used the derivative:
f ( x ) = x + x 1
f ′ ( x ) = 1 − x 2 1
f ′ ′ ( x ) = x 3 2
Let's see if we can find a minimum:
f ′ ( x ) = 0 ⇒ x = 1 since x > 0
We have a maximum or minimum at x = 1 . Let's check with f ′ ′ :
f ′ ′ ( 1 ) = 2
It's a minimum! So what's the minimum value of f ( x ) , x > 0 ?
f ( 1 ) = 1 + 1 = 2
Definitely not the prettiest solution, but it's another way to do it.
Visually this is sorta how I did it. We know the two functions, x and 1/x, meet at 0. The derivative of x is 1, this function is just a straight line. And to get to two we know 1/x must be above the line 2-x, visually this very natural and clear too. Also we know the derivative of 1/x at 1 is -1. When we travel to the left the derivative well only increase in modulus so it is above the line. To the right we know the rate of decent must slow down as to not hit 0, and there no weird back and forth or weird inflection point phenomena. So 1/x is always above the line 2-x.
This is a good solution as you have find it in one of the few best ways that is to use calculus.
Wonderful to see the range of solutions!
For positive x, simple algebra gives
( x − x 1 ) 2 = x + x 1 − 2
Since the left hand side is the square of a real number it is non-negative, so
x + x 1 − 2 ≥ 0
and the result follows!
Let's treat x + x 1 as a function. So we have f ( x ) = x + x 1
Then we want to find its minimum for positive values of x . We can do this the usual way, by the first derivative.
f ′ ( x ) = 1 − x 2 1
1 − x 2 1 = 0
1 = x 2 1
x 2 = 1
x = 1 or x = − 1
But since x has to be positive, then we choose x = 1
Let's verify that x = 1 is in fact a minimum with the second derivative.
f ′ ′ ( x ) = x 3 2
For x = 1 we have f ′ ′ ( 1 ) = 2 > 0
Therefore the value x = 1 give us a minimum.
Let's check that minimum for f ( x ) when x = 1
f ( 1 ) = 1 + 1 1 = 2
So we can see that, not only the expression x + x 1 can be equal to two, but also that it is greater than 2 for any other positive value of x .
x + x 1 ≥ 2 ∀ x ∈ R > 0
In fact, we could change the problem to ∣ x + x 1 ∣ ≥ 2 and then it would be true for both the negative and positive part of the function, excluding 0 .
The smaller "x" gets, the bigger "1/x" gets, so an x value < 1 would never give the expression a value < 2, it reaches it's minimum value at x=1 and keeps increasing beyond that point.
just use basic inequality a + b ≥ 2 a b ( a , b ≥ 0 )
Yaa !!! It's the overall summary in short.
note if x = 1 then x + x 1 = 2
so write x = 1 + y , x > 0 So
x + x 1 = ( 1 + y ) + 1 + y 1
= 1 + y ( 1 + y ) 2 + 1
= 1 + y y 2 + 2 y + 2
= 1 + y y 2 + 1 + y 2 + 2 y
= 1 + y y 2 + 2
> = 2
Note: this relies on 1 + y > 0 this as true as 1 + y = x > 0
For all x in R*+, ( x+1/x ) >= 2.
f(x)=x+1/x , If x=1, 1+1=2 , If x->0, you'll have (x+1/x) -> infinite , If x -> infinite,
lim x->0 (f(x))=infinite lim x->infinite (f(x))=infinite
f'(x)=1+ x 2 − 1 =0 to find the minimum
x 2 x 2 − 1 =1+ x 2 − 1 =0 so when x=1, this is the minimum, f(1)=2 So, f(x)>=2.
The graph to add more informations:
Let x = 1 + y where y ≥ 0 and x ≥ 1
Putting in main equation
( 1 + y ) + 1 + y 1
= ( 1 + y ) ( 1 + y ) 2 + 1
= 1 + y y 2 + 2 y + 2
= y + 1 y 2 + 2 ≥ 2
And for
x < 1 ⇒ x 1 > 1
so same equation will apply
The minimum positive number is 1. With it the value is 2. Hence for any other positive number it will always be greater than 2.
That's a tricky way to find the minimum value.
Not necessarily true, but it helps with the reasoning: let's assume that x is rational, x = b a . then x + x 1 = x y x 2 + y 2 . Subtract 2 from both sides, for: x + x 1 - 2 = x y x 2 − 2 x y + y 2 = x y ( x − y ) 2 . xy is positive, and ( x − y ) 2 is either 0, or positive, thus the original x + x 1 must be ≥ 2.
Oh !!! this is also a good way.
We have the function f ( x ) = x + x 1
Consider f ′ ( x ) and f ′ ′ ( x ) :
f ′ ( x ) = d x d f ( x ) = 1 − x 2 1
f ′ ′ ( x ) = d x d f ′ ( x ) = x 3 2
In order to find the minimum value of f ( x ) , set the derivative to 0:
0 = 1 − x 2 1
x 2 1 = 1
x 2 = 1
x = ± 1
Since x is a positive number, x = 1 . As f ′ ′ ( 1 ) = 2 > 0 , f ( x ) has a minimum at x = 1 .
f ( x ) ≥ f ( 1 ) = 2 → T r u e
Let x = 1 + Δ x .
This allows the question to be rewritten: ( 1 + Δ x ) + ( 1 + Δ x ) 1 > = 2
Combining terms and rearranging gives us: Δ x + 1 + Δ x 1 > = 1
1 + Δ x Δ x 2 + Δ x + 1 > = 1
1 + Δ x Δ x 2 + 1 + Δ x Δ x + 1 > = 1
1 + Δ x Δ x 2 > = 0
Δ x 2 > = 0
Which is true for any Δ x
Probably the simplest solution is that A.M >- G.M. Then (x + 1/x)/2 >= sqrt((x)*(1/x) = sqrt(1) = 1. Multiplying by 2, x + 1/x >+ 2. A second solution is to set the first derivative = 0, then show this leads to a maximum. That is let f(x) = x + 1/x. Then f'(x) = 1 -I/(x^2) = 0, or x^2 = 1, and x >0 implies x = 1; then f(1) =2, and f''(x) <0 shows this is a maximum. A third solution is to solve the equality x + 1/x =2, or x^2 - 2x + 1 =0, x _1 )^2 = 0, x =1. Then substitute values just above and below 1, and we find The value of x + 1/x exceeds 2. Ed Gray
I suggest you to do it by derivative method because none of them used that method still. I am happy that you have identified it.
x+(1/x)=(x^2+1)/x=((x-1)^2+2x))/x=(x-1)^2/x+2 (x-1)^2/x>0 such that x+(1/x)=((x-1)^2/x)+2>2
The most basic solution none of this garbage y'all are posting about the arithmetic mean
( x - 1) 2 > 0
x 2 +1 > 2 x
x + x 1 > 2
Why are using uncommon language. If you don't want to answer why did you answer it nobody forced you to do it. Please try to learn desecnt language.
@Ram Mohith i think in maths we should be looking for the most bleedingly obvious and fastest solution, rather than the longest proof. The human mind wants to take the path of 0 resistance as that works best so that is what im providing. Also don't know how to type greater than or equal to.
x + 1/x => 2
Multiply both sides of the inequality by x. Because x is a positive number, the inequality does not flip.
x^2 + 1 => 2x
x^2 -2x + 1 => 0
(x-1)^2 => 0
Because this final expression is squared, it cannot be negative. It may equal any non negative as well. Consider any a=>0:
x^2 -2x + 1 = a
x^2 -2x + (1-a) = 0
Apply the quadratic formula:
x = [ -(-2) +/- sqrt(2^2 - 4(1-a)(1)) ] / (2(1))
If the discriminant is non-negative, then the expression can equal a:
d = sqrt(2^2 - 4(1-a)(1))
d = sqrt(4 - 4 + a)
d = sqrt(a) => 0, since a=>0
Hence, x^2 - 2x + 1 = (x-1)^2 = a is possible for any a=>0, and the original equality is always true.
if n + 1/n -2 < 0 , then n² - 2n + 2 < 0, (n - 1)² + 1 < 0 (n - 1)² < -1 so it does not support
I don’t like the solutions involving (x - 1) squared. By that logic, x + 1/x >= 2 is true for negative numbers as well.
Here’s a different approach. We can observe that it is true for any numbers we try. For example, x = 9/10. 9/10 is less than 1 by 1/10, but 10/9 is greater than 1 by 1/9, so 9/10 + 10/9 > 2.
Let e>0 be an arbitrary small number. Let x be 1 - e. Then x + 1/x = 1 - e + 1/(1 - e) = 1 - e + (1 + e)/(1 - e^2). Since 1 - e^2 < 1, (1 + e)/(1 - e^2) = 1 + e + c where c is positive. Thus 1 - e + 1/(1 - e) = 2 + c > 2. Done.
Arithmatic mean>= Geometricmean so it's true
But just giving statement is not enough.
srx means square root of x.
Ok.
(srx - 1/srx)^2 >= 0 is always true
x - 2 + 1/x >= 0 Now add 2 on either side.
x + 1/x >= 2 is still always true.
There are 2 ways to prove:
arethemetic mean is greater than or equal to geometric mean
=> AM of x And 1/x = (x +1/x)/2
=> GM of x and 1/ x = ( x*1/x) = 1
=> now AM >= GM So (x +1/x)/2 >= 1 or x +1/x >= 2
;2. Square of a real no. Is always >= 0
=> ( sqrt (x ) - sqrt (1/x))^2 >= 0
=> x + 1/x - 2 >= 0
=> x + 1/x >= 2
Please use LaTeX in your solution.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
A simpler alternative proof:
x + x 1 ≥ 2
Since x > 0, we can multiply both sides by x :
x 2 + 1 ≥ 2 x
x 2 − 2 x + 1 ≥ 0
( x − 1 ) 2 ≥ 0
Which is obviously true, because the square of a real number (x - 1) is always non-negative.