Number Triangle

Algebra Level 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 \large \begin{array} {ccccccc}&&&1&&& \\ && 2 & {\color{#D61F06}3} & 4 && \\ & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 \\ 10 & 11 & {\color{#D61F06}12} & 13 & {\color{#D61F06}14} & 15 & 16 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \end{array}

The pyramid above is being built with all positive integers appearing in ascending order, with each additional row having two more elements. Each number colored red satisfies ( Red Number ) = ( First Number in its Row ) + ( First Number in its Column ) . (\text{Red Number})=(\text{First Number in its Row})+(\text{First Number in its Column}). The three numbers 3 = 2 + 1 , 12 = 10 + 2 , 14 = 10 + 4 {\color{#D61F06}3}=2+1,\, {\color{#D61F06}12} = 10 + 2,\, {\color{#D61F06}14} = 10 + 4 all satisfy this condition, while 7 = 5 + 2 , 7=5 + 2, for example, doesn't.

Going deep down much further, will the number 2 2017 { 2 }^{ 2017 } be colored red?

Yes No

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

David Vreken
Jul 29, 2020

The red numbers must always have an odd factor (see proof below), so 2 2017 2^{2017} will not be colored red .


Proof that the red numbers must always have an odd factor:

The way the numbers are written, the left side red numbers underneath the first number n n of each row will be n n rows below it. (For example, the red number 12 12 is 2 2 rows under the 2 2 .) Note that the last number of each row is a square number, which means the first number of each row is square number plus one, or x 2 + 1 x^2 + 1 , so the red number underneath it is x 2 + 1 x^2 + 1 rows below it, making it have a value of r left = ( x + ( x 2 + 1 ) ) 2 + 1 + ( x 2 + 1 ) = x 4 + 2 x 3 + 4 x 2 + 2 x + 3 r_{\text{left}} = (x + (x^2 + 1))^2 + 1 + (x^2 + 1) = x^4 + 2x^3 + 4x^2 + 2x + 3 .

By a similar argument, the right side red numbers have a value of r right = ( x + ( x 2 + 1 ) ) 2 + 1 + 2 ( x + ( x 2 + 1 ) ) + 1 ( x 2 + 1 ) = x 4 + 2 x 3 + 4 x 2 + 4 x + 3 r_{\text{right}} = (x + (x^2 + 1))^2 + 1 + 2(x + (x^2 + 1)) + 1 - (x^2 + 1) = x^4 + 2x^3 + 4x^2 + 4x + 3 .

Now we can consider two cases, one where x x is even and one where x x is odd:

  • If x x is even, then both r left = x 4 + 2 x 3 + 4 x 2 + 2 x + 3 r_{\text{left}} = x^4 + 2x^3 + 4x^2 + 2x + 3 and r right = x 4 + 2 x 3 + 4 x 2 + 4 x + 3 r_{\text{right}} = x^4 + 2x^3 + 4x^2 + 4x + 3 are odd, which means they only have odd factors.

  • If x x is odd, then let x = 2 k + 1 x = 2k + 1 for some integer k k , and r left = 4 ( 4 k 4 + 12 k 3 + 16 k 2 + 10 k + 3 ) r_{\text{left}} = 4(4k^4 + 12k^3 + 16k^2 + 10k + 3) and r right = 2 ( 8 k 4 + 24 k 3 + 32 k 2 + 22 k + 7 ) r_{\text{right}} = 2(8k^4 + 24k^3 + 32k^2 + 22k + 7) , both of which have odd factors.

Either way, a red number must always have an odd factor.

Sir, was my method that I said to Vinayak was correct? @David Vreken

Aryan Sanghi - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Thanks for the solution, Sir! Can it be done like @Aryan Sanghi told?

Vinayak Srivastava - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Well, it is true that no number in an odd row will be colored red, but 2 2017 + 1 \lfloor 2^{2017} \rfloor + 1 is an even number, not an odd number (see here ), so unfortunately that method would need a little more work.

David Vreken - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Oh, so what can be done after knowing no element is in odd row?

Vinayak Srivastava - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Vinayak Srivastava I'm not sure if you can use that fact to prove the answer. I ended up using a different method.

David Vreken - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@David Vreken No problem! Your method is excellent! Upvoted!

Vinayak Srivastava - 10 months, 2 weeks ago
Alex Mandelias
Jul 24, 2018

How can you possibly prove this? I thought that 3, 12, 14 are not powers of 2 and therefore 2 2017 {2}^{2017} would not satisfy the given condition

Log in to reply

You'll see that no number in an odd-th number of row will be coloured red(try and prove). 2 2017 2^{2017} lies in a odd-th number of row, as 2 2017 + 1 \lfloor\sqrt{2^{2017}}\rfloor + 1 is an odd number where . \lfloor.\rfloor denotes floor function. Hope it helps. :)

@Vinayak Srivastava @Alex Mandelias

Aryan Sanghi - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Ok, thank you! Any hint(small only)? I can't understand where to start. Is it related to parity?

Vinayak Srivastava - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Vinayak Srivastava Exactly, it is related to parity. Try checking difference better the number and first element of the row where number lies.

Aryan Sanghi - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Aryan Sanghi Till now I got to this:

  • The first no. of an odd-th row is odd, and even-th row is even.

  • The first no. of an odd-th column to the right side is an odd perfect square, and to the left side is also odd.

  • An odd no.+An odd no. =Even no.

  • How to proceed?

Vinayak Srivastava - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Vinayak Srivastava Check the first number of each column from middle and proceed on both directions. You'll get the pattern.

Aryan Sanghi - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Aryan Sanghi I think there is no even number in an odd row and odd column both at the same time. But, in an odd row, we definitely need an odd column to make an even no. Is this correct?

Vinayak Srivastava - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Vinayak Srivastava Yes, it seemd correct. :)

Aryan Sanghi - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

I found that every red number must have at least one odd factor (see my solution).

David Vreken - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@David Vreken is my method correct sir?

Aryan Sanghi - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Aryan Sanghi It's true that no number in an odd row will be colored red, but 2 2017 + 1 \lfloor 2^{2017} \rfloor + 1 is an even number, not an odd number (see here ), so unfortunately your method would need a little more work.

David Vreken - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@David Vreken Ohk, my calculation was really bad. Thanks a lot sir for seeing to my solution. :)

Aryan Sanghi - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...