Okay, where does it end?

Algebra Level 4

Y = [ ( 1 + 1 n ) ( 1 + 2 n ) ( 1 + 3 n ) ( 1 + n n ) ] 1 n \large\displaystyle Y= \left[ \left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right) \left(1+\frac{2}{n}\right) \left(1+\frac{3}{n}\right) \cdots \left(1+\frac{n}{n}\right) \right]^{\frac{1}{n}}

Find the value of Y \lceil Y \rceil , where n n is a positive integer.

Submit your answer as 123 if you think that the answer depends on the value of n n

Notation : \lceil \cdot \rceil denotes the ceiling function .


This problem is a part of the set All-Zebra


The answer is 2.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Using the AM-GM inequality, we have:

Y 1 n k = 1 n ( 1 + k n ) 1 n k = 1 n 1 + 1 n 2 k = 1 n k n n + n ( n + 1 ) 2 n 2 3 2 + 1 2 n 2 As 3 2 + 1 2 n 2 is maximum when n = 1 and 3 2 + 1 2 n 2 2 Y 2 \begin{aligned} Y & \le \frac{1}{n} \sum_{k=1}^n \left(1+\frac{k}{n}\right) \\ & \le \frac{1}{n} \sum_{k=1}^n 1 + \frac{1}{n^2} \sum_{k=1}^n k \\ & \le \frac{n}{n} + \frac{n(n+1)}{2n^2} \\ & \le \frac{3}{2} + \frac{1}{2\color{#3D99F6}{n}^2} \quad \quad \small \color{#3D99F6}{\text{As } \frac{3}{2} + \frac{1}{2n^2} \text{ is maximum when }n=1 \text{ and }\frac{3}{2} + \frac{1}{2n^2}\le 2} \\ \implies Y & \le 2 \end{aligned}

Since each factor ( 1 + k n ) > 1 \left(1 +\dfrac {k} {n} \right) >1 , their product Y > 1 Y>1 .

Therefore 1 < Y 2 Y = 2 1 <Y\le 2 \implies \lceil Y \rceil =\boxed {2}

Elegant :) !!

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Yes, but can there be an alternative approach for solving problems which state that n is a positive integers by substituting n = 1,2,3,... For example
when n=1, then Y = 2 \lceil Y\rceil = 2
when n=2, then Y = 2 \lceil Y\rceil = 2
when n=3, then Y = 2 \lceil Y\rceil = 2
Thoughts?


Ashish Menon - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

But it does not prove that for all infinitely many values of n n it equals 2.

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Nihar Mahajan Yes it is but then the question itself becomes wrong if it the answer is equal for some n but not for others right? :thinkingface:

Ashish Menon - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Ashish Menon Its a more like proof based question rather than answer-computing.Proving that would improve your skills rather than taking advantage of the brilliant's system of answer-accepting ;)

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Nihar Mahajan Accepted :nomouth:

Ashish Menon - 5 years, 1 month ago

@Nihar Mahajan I think the question should include "this should be true for all n. If you think this is not possible, enter 123".

Aryan Gaikwad - 5 years, 1 month ago

@Nihar Mahajan It never equals to 2, but always stays between 1 and 2.

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Abhay Tiwari I obviously know that.But Y \lceil Y \rceil remains 2 right?

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Nihar Mahajan Yes, it will a l w a y s always remain 2.

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

@Abhay Tiwari What about when n=1?

Ashish Menon - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Ashish Menon Ohk, it equal to 2, forgot to mention that. :P

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Abhay Tiwari Nvm, i agree with nihar though it is better to prove it for all values than that method, btw it is valid still in JEE right?

Ashish Menon - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Ashish Menon Yep, you can use it as a "shortcut" or "time-saving" method in JEE. (Though such a question has a very low probability to be asked in JEE).However, its not mathematically complete.

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 1 month ago

@Nihar Mahajan Congo on 2000 followers

Ashish Menon - 5 years, 1 month ago

Ashish, there is one more solution at the last, maybe that is the answer to all the questions you seek. ;), he has done simply by logic plus by conventional method.

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Abhay Tiwari That was a small typo plz correct it thanks! :))

Ashish Menon - 5 years, 1 month ago

Awesome solution from you as always @Chew-Seong Cheong

Sudhir Aripirala - 5 years, 1 month ago
展豪 張
May 8, 2016

On one hand, Y > ( ( 1 + 1 n ) ( 1 + 1 n ) ( 1 + 1 n ) ) 1 n = 1 + 1 n > 1 Y>((1+\dfrac 1n)(1+\dfrac 1n)\cdots(1+\dfrac 1n))^{\frac 1n}=1+\dfrac 1n > 1
On the other hand, Y < ( ( 1 + n n ) ( 1 + n n ) ( 1 + n n ) ) 1 n = 1 + n n = 2 Y<((1+\dfrac nn)(1+\dfrac nn)\cdots(1+\dfrac nn))^{\frac 1n}=1+\dfrac nn = 2
Concluded, 1 < Y < 2 1<Y<2
Y = 2 \therefore \lceil Y \rceil = 2

Great, can you find the exact value?

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Exact value? Do you mean when n n \to \infty ?

展豪 張 - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Yes. When n n \to \infty

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Abhay Tiwari ln lim n ( ( 1 + 1 n ) ( 1 + 2 n ) ( 1 + n n ) ) 1 n \;\;\;\;\ln\lim_{n\to\infty} ((1+\dfrac 1n)(1+\dfrac 2n)\cdots(1+\dfrac nn))^{\frac 1n}
= lim n 1 n ( ln ( 1 + 1 n ) + ln ( 1 + 2 n ) + ln ( 1 + n n ) ) =\lim_{n\to\infty}\dfrac 1n (\ln (1+\dfrac 1n)+\ln (1+\dfrac 2n)+\cdots \ln (1+\dfrac nn))
= 0 1 ln ( 1 + x ) d x =\displaystyle \int_0^1 \ln(1+x)\mathrm dx
= ( 1 + x ) ln ( 1 + x ) 0 1 0 1 d x =\displaystyle(1+x)\ln(1+x)|_0^1 - \int_0^1 \mathrm dx
= 2 ln 2 1 =2\ln 2 -1
lim n Y = e 2 ln 2 1 = 4 e \displaystyle\therefore \lim_{n\to\infty} Y=e^{2\ln 2-1}=\dfrac 4e

展豪 張 - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@展豪 張 Great :(+1): :)

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Abhay Tiwari At first I thought your question is asking this, but I soon find out it's actually asking Y \lceil Y\rceil . =D
:like: (+1)

展豪 張 - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@展豪 張 :D, still the answer remains same, Lol.

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

Abhay, it was me who change the wording of the problem. I hope it is okay for you.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Sir, it looks great now. :)

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago
A P
May 9, 2016

Without loss of generality, we can assume n is equal to 1. Plugging it in, we find that Y is 2.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...