Only Perfect squares

a , b , c , a,b,c, and d d are distinct positive integers which satisfy the following properties:

  • the sum of any two of them is a perfect square, and

  • the sum of the four numbers is also a perfect square.

Find the smallest possible value of a + b + c + d \sqrt{a+b+c+d} .


The answer is 130.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Ossama Ismail
Feb 20, 2017

The smallest possible values that satisfy the given conditions are:-

a = 386 b = 2114 c = 3970 d = 10430 a=386 \\ b=2114 \\ c=3970 \\ d=10430

a + b = 2500 = 5 0 2 a + c = 4356 = 6 6 2 a + d = 10816 = 10 4 2 b + c = 6084 = 7 8 2 b + d = 12544 = 11 2 2 c + d = 14400 = 12 0 2 S = a + b + c + d = 16900 = 13 0 2 S = 130 a+b = 2500 = 50^2 \\ a+c =4356 = 66^2 \\ a+d = 10816 = 104^2 \\ b+c = 6084 = 78^2 \\b+d=12544=112^2\\ c+d = 14400 = 120^2 \\ S =a+b+c+d =16900 =130^2 \\ \sqrt{S} = 130

a = 386 b = 2114 c = 3970 d = 10430 a=386 \\ b=2114 \\ c=3970 \\ d=10430

How did you find these numbers?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

When (a+b+c+d) is a perfect square, the answer can be found by using Pythagorean and the number has prime factors, 2 or in the form of n%4.=1

130=2 x 5 x 13 is one of these numbers. will get back to you later.

Ossama Ismail - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Nice, that's the idea. We want at least 3 (unordered) pairs of positive integer solutions to x 2 + y 2 = s 2 x^2 + y^2 = s^2 , and we can use the characterization to tell that s = 2 × 5 × 13 s = 2 \times 5 \times 13 is the minimum possible value of s s .

We then have 4 (linearly independent) equations in 4 unknowns, which lead to a unique solution (that we has to verify has positive integer solutions).

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin What do you think about adding the word 'distinct' to the question? It would otherwise appear as though (1,8,8,8) satisfies the conditions.

Abel McElroy - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Abel McElroy distinct was added to the question.

Ossama Ismail - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ossama Ismail Nice! thanks. great question! thanks for posting it.

Abel McElroy - 4 years, 3 months ago

@Ossama Ismail - I added the b + d = 12544 = 11 2 2 b+d=12544=112^2 line. Hope you don't mind. I think the next largest set of 4 distinct Natural Numbers is {872, 2377, 9944, 21032} which would give rise to the answer 185 \boxed{185}

Woops! The second set of 4 distinct Natural Numbers is {590, 4594, 5810, 17906} which would give rise to the answer 170 \boxed{170}

Bob Kadylo - 4 years, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...