Pancake Riddle

You were having a party and had made 11 congruent pancakes for 11 people before an unexpected guest showed up, and there was no flour left to make another pancake.

As a result, for an even distribution to the 12 people, you decided to cut the pancakes under the condition that each cut would be along a pancake's diameter only. For instance, to divide a pancake into 12 equal slices, 6 cuts would be made, as shown above right.

What would be the least number of cuts you need to make to achieve equal shares for everyone?

Details and Assumptions:

  • No stacking of pancakes is allowed.
  • Each cut must be done on one pancake at a time, where the pancake must be divided into equal slices.


The answer is 18.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Relevant wiki: Egyptian Fractions

From the question, to divide 11 11 pancakes among 12 12 people, each person would get 11 12 \dfrac{11}{12} of the whole pancake.

Intuitively, one could divide each pancake into 12 12 parts, and each person would take 11 11 slices as an equal share. However, that would require too much time and too many cuts, which wouldn't be our desired solution.

By limiting the cuts along diameters only, that means each slice would have an even denominator, and such denominator would need to be as least as possible to avoid too many cuts. As such, the fraction would need to be in its reduced lowest terms (reduced denominator as possible), and by approximation with the small integer (preferably 2 2 ), we are approaching the desired fraction with the highest possible value as called Greedy Algorithm .

In order to perform fewest cuts, we could adopt a primitive method used by the Egyptians, the Egyptian Fractions , or fractions with numerator 1 1 as shown:

11 12 = 1 2 + 1 4 + 1 6 \dfrac{11}{12} = \dfrac{1}{2} + \dfrac{1}{4} + \dfrac{1}{6}

Thereby, after starting with even denominator of 2 2 , the next least possible one is 4 4 , according to Greedy Algorithm , resulting in the summation above. Note that by skipping 4 4 to 6 6 , other variation is possible, such as:

11 12 = 1 2 + 2 6 + 1 12 \dfrac{11}{12} = \dfrac{1}{2} + \dfrac{2}{6} + \dfrac{1}{12}

But note that the sum of the three denominators in the latter case is higher, resulting in more cuts. Thus, the optimal summation is:

11 12 = 1 2 + 1 4 + 1 6 \dfrac{11}{12} = \dfrac{1}{2} + \dfrac{1}{4} + \dfrac{1}{6}

In other words, we wouldn't need to divide any pancake into 12 12 pieces. Instead, each person would get a share of one-half plus one-fourth and one-sixth.

That is, first, we would take 6 6 pancakes and divide each in halves (one cut each). That would result in 12 12 one-half slices, and so each person would get that one-half. (Totally 6 6 cuts)

Then we would take 3 3 pancakes and divide each in quarters (2 cuts each). That would result in 12 12 one-fourth slices, and so each person would get that one-fourth. (Totally 3 × 2 = 6 3\times 2 = 6 cuts)

Finally, we would take the remaining 2 2 pancakes and divide each in six portions (3 cuts each). That would result in 12 12 one-sixth slices, and so each person would get that one-sixth. (Totally 2 × 3 = 6 2\times 3 = 6 cuts)

Overall, we could divide 11 11 pancakes among 12 12 people by cutting only 18 \boxed{18} times.

Uhm!! Does everyone necessarily needs to get exact same shapes and number of pieces? If No, I can achieve this in 16 cuts.
My point is that can we give 11 pieces each being 1/12th of the pancake to one person and 2 pieces; 1 being half and the other being 5/12th of the pancake to another?

Yatin Khanna - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Well, that's not the way I intended though. I would prefer to demonstrate equal portions like the Egyptians had done. Your way is possible but may not be as convincing to naked eyes without the use of angle protector. Anyway, I'll edit so that it's clearer.

Worranat Pakornrat - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

So, have you guessed my 16 cuts? Eh?

Yatin Khanna - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Yatin Khanna Yeah, but I have edited so that it's no longer applicable. Please see the edited version.

Worranat Pakornrat - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Worranat Pakornrat Great Sir! Now, I dont think there is any scope for loopholes left :)

Yatin Khanna - 4 years, 5 months ago

Great question! It might be worth mentioning that you are not allowed to stack the pancakes before cutting, for in that case you could actually create the pieces you describe in a total of 4 cuts, (through stacks of different heights: 1 cut through a stack of all 12, 1 more through one stack of 3 pancakes, (to get the quarters), then 2 more cuts through the final 3 pancakes to obtain the sixths).

Brian Charlesworth - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh, I never thought of that cheating. Thank you for your advice.

Worranat Pakornrat - 4 years, 5 months ago

If stacking was allowed I think 2 would be the minimum number of cuts needed (only if the answer to my query (see my comment) is "NO.")

Yatin Khanna - 4 years, 5 months ago

You haven't shown that you cannot achieve less than 18 cuts with some other way. Egyptian fractions are not important, because you can probably divide a pie in different fractions (e.g. 2/3, 1/3, 2/3, 1/3). You must mention that each pie must be divided in equal slices.

Ivan Koswara - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

I did. It was stated in the question. See the phrase in parenthesis. Plus you can't divide as 1/3 as it wouldn't be along the diameter. The denominator must be even.

Worranat Pakornrat - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Whoops, I meant 2/6, 1/6, 2/6, 1/6.

Usually when the phrase is in parentheses, it's not important (that's the use of parentheses). Preferably emphasize it as well, because this is different from usual problems of this kind.

You still haven't shown that 18 cuts is the minimum.

Ivan Koswara - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ivan Koswara This is the explanation I can think of so far. Comments are welcome.

Worranat Pakornrat - 4 years, 5 months ago

Even better solution, just give your pancake to the unexpected guest so the other guests don't have 1/6th of a pancake in their hands o:

Razzi Masroor - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

How generous of you. :)

Worranat Pakornrat - 4 years, 5 months ago

(Author of problem has edited his problem)

Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 5 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...