Given
E ( a , b , c ) = a ( b 3 − c 3 ) + b ( c 3 − a 3 ) + c ( a 3 − b 3 ) ,
find the value of
( 2 0 1 4 − 2 0 1 6 ) ( 2 0 1 4 + 2 0 1 6 + 2 0 1 8 ) E ( 2 0 1 4 , 2 0 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Interesting, I didn't think of it that way. What I saw is that E ( b , b , c ) = 0 → ( a − b ) is a factor, and since E ( a , b , c ) is cyclic, then ( a − b ) ( b − c ) ( c − a ) must also be a factor. Since the degree of E ( a , b , c ) is 4 but the degree of ( a − b ) ( b − c ) ( c − a ) is 3, then E ( a , b , c ) = ( a − b ) ( b − c ) ( c − a ) k ( a + b + c ) . By substituting some values for a , b , c , we can find that k = 1 and thus the fully factorized form of E ( a , b , c ) = ( a − b ) ( b − c ) ( c − a ) ( a + b + c ) . We cancel ( a − b ) ( a + b + c ) in the denominator, and this leaves ( b − c ) ( c − a ) , and since b = 2 0 1 6 , c = 2 0 1 8 , a = 2 0 1 4 , this gives − 8
Wow...never thought determinants could be used to solve this
Log in to reply
Yep.... Discriminants make life easy... :-)
Log in to reply
Only if you know how to use it. If you're not good with it, things become a mess very quickly.
For these types of problems, since the values ( 2 0 1 4 , 2 0 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 ) are given, I would just prefer to substitute ( n − 2 , n , n + 2 ) and simplify it
Log in to reply
@Hung Woei Neoh – That's what also striked me first time but as usual I was lazy to grab pen and paper so I converted into determinants and then applied properties to simplify....
Log in to reply
@Rishabh Jain – Lol. Ever since I started my Brilliant journey, I always keep a notebook and a pencil with me wherever I am, so that I can start solving problems whenever I feel like it. Of course, I only type solutions with my laptop
Log in to reply
@Hung Woei Neoh – That's a very good habit... :-)
you mean determinants
Let a = 2 0 1 4 = n − 2 , b = 2 0 1 6 = n , c = 2 0 1 8 = n + 2
( 2 0 1 4 − 2 0 1 6 ) ( 2 0 1 4 + 2 0 1 6 + 2 0 1 8 ) E ( 2 0 1 4 , 2 0 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 ) = ( n − 2 − n ) ( n − 2 + n + n + 2 ) ( n − 2 ) ( n 3 − ( n + 2 ) 3 ) + n ( ( n + 2 ) 3 − ( n − 2 ) 3 ) + ( n + 2 ) ( ( n − 2 ) 3 − n 3 ) = − 2 ( 3 n ) ( n − 2 ) ( n 3 − n 3 − 6 n 2 − 1 2 n − 8 ) + n ( n 3 + 6 n 2 + 1 2 n + 8 − n 3 + 6 n 2 − 1 2 n + 8 ) + ( n + 2 ) ( n 3 − 6 n 2 + 1 2 n − 8 − n 3 ) = − 6 n ( n − 2 ) ( − 6 n 2 − 1 2 n − 8 ) + n ( 1 2 n 2 + 1 6 ) + ( n + 2 ) ( − 6 n 2 + 1 2 n − 8 ) = − 6 n − 6 n 3 + 1 2 n 2 − 1 2 n 2 + 2 4 n − 8 n + 1 6 + 1 2 n 3 + 1 6 n − 6 n 3 − 1 2 n 2 + 1 2 n 2 + 2 4 n − 8 n − 1 6 = − 6 n 4 8 n = − 8
Nice... (+1)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
See Determinants E ( a , b , c ) = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ a a 3 1 b b 3 1 c c 3 1 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ Perform C 1 → C 1 − C 2 ; C 2 → C 2 − C 3
= ( a − b ) ( b − c ) ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ 1 a 2 + a b + b 2 0 1 b 2 + b c + c 2 0 c c 3 1 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣
Now simply expand along R 3
E ( a , b , c ) = ( a − b ) ( b − c ) ( c − a ) ( a + b + c ) ⟹ ( b − c ) ( a + b + c ) E ( a , b , c ) = ( a − b ) ( c − a )
Put a = 2 0 1 4 , b = 2 0 1 6 , c = 2 0 1 8
⟹ ( 2 0 1 4 − 2 0 1 6 ) ( 2 0 1 4 + 2 0 1 6 + 2 0 1 8 ) E ( 2 0 1 4 , 2 0 1 6 , 2 0 1 8 ) = − 8