± 1 ± 2 ± 3 ± ⋯ ± 2 0 1 7 ± 2 0 1 8 = ?
Using appropriate + and - signs on the left side of the equation, which number can be obtained on the right?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You didn't show that 1001 can be obtained.
Log in to reply
See David Vreken's solution.
One solution: pairs of adjacent numbers can be put in sets of 4 to equal zero, by subtracting the inner two numbers from the outer two (e.g. (+49-50)+(-385+386)=0). split 1...498 into pairs, have 500&501 as a pair, and split 503...2018 into pairs, which can be put into sets of 4 in this manner to equal 0. this leaves 499+502=1001.
Since I can only reply here... I'll do it here. The way I see it, I can allways null the sum of an odd quantity of serial numbers, starting from 1. Let me exemplify: consider the sequence 1,2,3,4,5,6,7. I can add 6+1, subtract (5+2), add 3+4, and in the end, subtract 7. This gives zero. The sequence 1 to 9 can be worked the same way, and in true any sequence ending in as odd number can be worked out in a similar way. So I guess I prove that a possible result is indeed 2018, because I can zero the sequence 1 trough 2017. My question is: where am I wrong, because the "system" told me 2018 was a wrong answer. Thank you very much yo any one that can answer me.
Log in to reply
Unfortunately, this method won't work with the series 1 to 2017, as there are an odd number of odd numbers in the set. The method also doesn't work with the numbers 1 to 9: 1+8,2+7,3+6,4+5,9 gives you five 9s, but you can't make 0 using five 9s (the closest you can get is 9 or -9).
They should of put a variable instead of •••
Starting with − 1 and alternating signs gives − 1 + 2 − 3 + 4 − ⋯ − 2 0 1 7 + 2 0 1 8 = ( − 1 + 2 ) + ( − 3 + 4 ) + ⋯ + ( − 2 0 1 7 + 2 0 1 8 ) = 2 2 0 1 8 = 1 0 0 9 . Changing the + 4 to a − 4 makes 1 0 0 9 − 4 − 4 = 1 0 0 1 .
Since there are an odd number of odd numbers, the sum must be odd, so the even choices cannot be obtained.
You didn't show that the other numbers cannot be obtained.
Log in to reply
Since there are an odd number of odd numbers, the sum must be odd, so the even choices cannot be obtained.
Log in to reply
Great, edit your solution to include this to make it complete.
See Julian Yu's solution.
Use LOGIC: in a multiple choice question, only one of the given answers are correct. If one of the answers are shown to be correct, then you can assume that all the other answer choices are wrong.
Log in to reply
Yes, but a proper solution would show that the remaining choices indeed are wrong. What if the problem had a mistake in it?
I would only like to add some clarity that helped me and may help others just learning...since there are an odd (1009) number of odd numbers and odd (1009) of even numbers as previously stated that given an odd number of evens: Even + Even + Even = Even
and and odd number of Odds: Odd + Odd + Odd = Even + Odd = Odd (since Odd + Odd = Even)
Flipping the sign on the 4 from + to - causes a doubling effect of subtracting 8 from 1009 to equal 1001.
Why are you subtracting -4-4 They are already used
Log in to reply
The plus-minus sign means I can either add or subtract. The equation with the alternating signs (that equals 1009) was my first approximation. I then adjusted the sign in front of the 4 from plus to minus, which means I have to -4 to undo the +4 and -4 again to make it -4, and this adjustment gave me the desired sum.
If u leave (-3+4) set nd simplify every other ones u would obtain 1008. Now by changing the sign of +4 into -4 u would obtain 1008 -3 -4 which is 1001
( 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + k + ⋯ + n ) − 2 k = 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ − k + ⋯ + n I mean, first you have determined k = 1 ∑ n k ⋅ ( − 1 ) k . Then you just converted + k to − k by adding − 2 k . Is this is what you've done?
Log in to reply
Yes, that is correct.
Log in to reply
( k = 1 ∑ 2 0 1 8 k ⋅ ( − 1 ) k ) − 2 × 4 = 1 0 0 1 . Thank you! An simple yet effective way to solve this problem.
Edit: 2037173 has been removed from the choices.
First of all, 1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + 2 0 1 8 = 2 0 3 7 1 7 1 , so clearly, 2037173 is impossible.
Now, note that changing any of the + signs to - signs will not affect the parity of the answer. Therefore, since 2037171 is odd, only odd numbers can be obtained. The only odd number left is 1001.
You didn't show that 1001 can be obtained.
Log in to reply
See David Vreken's solution.
Log in to reply
Still, this solution is incomplete.
Log in to reply
@Jesse Nieminen – What prevents you from writing your own solution...? Be the change you want to see.
Use LOGIC. in a multiple choice question, exactly one of the given answers are correct. If it is proven that 3 out of 4 of the choices are wrong, then you can assume that the last one is right.
Log in to reply
Yes, but a proper solution would show that the remaining choice indeed is correct. What if the problem had a mistake in it?
It wasn't neccesary for the question. But it's fun to know what numbers exactly you can make.
So when you change one number k from + to - it means you subtract 2k from the sum.
But what k you can subtract?
Obviously k can be all numbers from 1 up to 2018.
When you reach 2018 you start subtracting secound number starting from 1 to 2017.
(So you change 2018 and 1; 2018 and 2; ...; 2018 and 2017)
Then you can continue with more numbers in the same way, which means k can be all integers from 1 to 2037173.
So we can make any odd number from -2037173 to 2037173.
1001 can be obtained
Notice that there are 1 0 0 9 odd numbers in the set { 1 , 2 , … , 2 0 1 8 } . This is because every odd number is of the form 2 k − 1 , so there is bijection between sets { 1 , 2 … , 1 0 0 9 } and { 1 , 3 , … , 2 0 1 7 } given by k ↦ 2 k − 1 . Thus,
± 1 ± 2 ± 3 ± … ± 2 0 1 7 ± 2 0 1 8 ≡ ± 1 ± 0 ± 1 ± … ± 1 ± 0 ≡ 1 0 0 9 1 + 1 + … + 1 ≡ 1 0 0 9 ≡ 1 ( m o d 2 )
which proves that it is impossible to obtain even numbers, leaving 1 0 0 1 as the only option.
To prove that we can obtain 1 0 0 1 , notice that the same reasoning as above gives us that there are 1 0 0 9 pairs { 2 k − 1 , 2 k } in the set { 1 , 2 , … , 2 0 1 8 } , so
− 1 + 2 − 3 + 4 − … − 2 0 1 7 + 2 0 1 8 = ( − 1 + 2 ) + ( − 3 + 4 ) + … + ( − 2 0 1 7 + 2 0 1 8 ) = 1 0 0 9 1 + 1 + … + 1 = 1 0 0 9 .
If we switch signs of any pair { 2 k − 1 , 2 k } in the above sum, the sum will decrease by 2 , since ( − ( 2 k − 1 ) + 2 k ) − ( ( 2 k − 1 ) − 2 k ) = 2 . Thus, pick 4 distinct pairs { 2 k − 1 , 2 k } for sign switch in the above sum to obtain 1 0 0 1 .
Only odd numbers can be obtained because the sum of all the numbers is odd, and changing the + and − signs doesn't change the parity of the answer. 1001 is the only odd answer choice, so it has to be the right one.
If you're not satisfied with that answer, and you want proof 1001 is obtainable, then
− 1 + 2 − 3 + 4 − 5 . . . − 2 0 1 7 + 2 0 1 8 = ( − 1 + 2 ) + ( − 3 + 4 ) + ( − 5 + 6 ) . . . + ( − 2 0 1 7 + 2 0 1 8 ) = 2 0 1 8 / 2 = 1 0 0 9 .
Changing the + 4 into − 4 gives 1 0 0 9 − 4 − 4 = 1 0 0 1
The sum or substraction of an even and an odd number is odd. We have 1009 even and 1009 odd numbers, which means and addition or substraction of and odd number of numbers which is necessarily odd. If you put -1 and +1002, you can group the rest of the numbers by four numbers with a zero sum : -2+3+4-5 for example. You do it from 2 to 1001 (1000 numbers, multiple of 4) and from 1003 to 2018 (1016 numbers, multiple of 4)
This problem reminds me of an anecdote about Carl Friedrich Gauss. When he went to basic school, one day his math teacher wanted a break and asked his pupils to add up the integers from 1 to 100. He thought that it would keep them busy for a while. But only a few moments later, young Gauss shouted: "5050". He had found that the formula ( n + 1 ) ⋅ 2 n did the job easily. Applied to our problem, in case of the max sum (all signs +) we see the two factors n+1=2019 and n/2 = 1009 are both odd, so the max sum is odd. Changing the sign of any of the integers i will reduce the sum by the even number 2i to a sum that is an odd number again. Thus, only 1001 is the correct result of the problem.
We group the numbers into pairs. {(1,2) ,(3,4) ,(4,5) ... (1017,1018)}. This list has size 1009. For each pair we subtract the first from the second. This gives a new set of numbers, {1, 1, 1... 1}, with same size 1009. The sum of these are 1009.
Now we see that the closest numbers are 1001 and 1000. So we go back to the pairs and see if we can alter a single value to subtract either 8 or 9 from the initial sum. In the pair (3,4) we can see having minus in front of both 3 and 4 will give -7. This is 8 less than 1 and will alter the result to be 1001.
I think that it would be a good idea to call the sum +1+2+....+2017+2018 = S is an odd number (1/2 X 2018X2019 = 2,037,171). And note that subtracting the first number 1 and adding the rest gives (-1) + 2 + ... + 2,017 + 2,018. And this can be written [2 x (-1) + (1 + 2 + ..... + 2,017 + 2,018)] or [2 x (-1) + S] Which is odd since the sum of all the numbers has been shown to be odd, and you are just subtracting and even number from this. So the answer has to be odd. As 3 of the answers are even, they must be wrong. BUT SURELY WE HAVE STILL NOT SHOWN THAT THE ODD ANSWER THAT IS GIVEN (1001) CAN BE CORRECT! We need the numbers that are added to sum to 1,019,086 and the numbers that are subtracted to add to 1,018,085. And note that the sum of all the numbers up to and including 1,426 equals .5 x 1426 x 1427 = 1,017,451. Then adding in addition the number 1,635 gets us to 1,019,086. Which is one of the ways (though by no means the unique way) of getting the answer of 1001 by adding all the numbers as I have said and then subtracting all the other numbers. (Note I do not think that all odd numbers between 1 and 2.037,171 will be able to be obtained, though I'm not certain about this! Perhaps someone else will investigate this, I think it will be interesting, I will investigate myself!!). Regards, David
Now I think that every odd number from 1 to 2,037,171 will be able to be obtained by adding and subtracting the correct numbers. I will attempt to show this by obtaining the number 1. Note that the numbers that are added will have to sum to 1,018,586 and then the numbers that are subtracted will sum to 1,018,585. So the total sum will be 1. The sum of the 1st 1,426 numbers equals 1,017,451. Then adding 2018 gives a sum that is more that the required 1,018,586. So I'll try the first 1,425 numbers which sum to .5 x 1,425 x 1,426 = 1,016,025 - which is still 2,516. So add 2,018 and take the 1425 away. To add an additional 593 to the sum. We will need to add 4 lots of 593. So that will be (2017 - 1424). And (2016 - 1423). And (2015 - 1422). So the sum becomes the sum of the first 1421 numbers + (2,015 + 2,016 + 2,017 + 2,018) = 0.5 x 1421 x 1422 + 8,066 = 1,018,397. We just need another 189 which can be obtained by not including 1,421 and adding 1,610. So to summarize sum to 1,420 and add 1,610 + 2,015 + 2,016 + 2,017 + 2,018 equals 0.5 x 1,420 x 1,421 + 9,676 = 1,008,910 + 9,676 = 1,018,586!! (THANK GOODNESS FOR THAT!!). So by subtracting all the other numbers you will obtain 1!! To obtain 3, add all the numbers except that instead of 1,610 you now need to add 1,611. (Because for every additional 1 that you add, there is also another 1 less to subtract!). Add increments of 1 until you reach 2014. So that the sum of numbers to 1,420 + 2014 + 2,015 + 2,016 + 2,017 + 2,018 equals 0.5 x 1420 x 1421 + 10,080 which equals 1,018,990. And the subtracted numbers sum to (2,037,171 - 1,018,990) = 1,018,181. So the total sum taking into account the digits that are subtracted is 1,018,990 - 1,018,181 = 809. There will always be a number that can be added by 1 to obtain the next odd number. I hope that people understand this, it has been quite involved! Regards, David
Log in to reply
I now recon that there would always be one number with a positive sign before it, and next to it with the 'value part of the number' with a negative sign before it. This negative sign could be reversed into a positive sign to give a total number 2 more than the previous number. I still think that it was not a wasted exercise to find the easiest way to find a total equal to 1. Regards, David
Arranging the numbers like this, (-1+2)+(-3+4)+(-5+6)+...+(2017-2018)= ? There are 2018/2=1009 pairs of numbers that result 1. So 1009x1 is equal 1009.
Look: (+/- doesn't matter, the number will keep odd/even)
》 Even+even+even=even> even-even-even=even 》 Odd+odd+odd= odd> odd-odd-odd=odd 》Odd+even= odd > odd-even=odd 》Even+odd= odd > even-odd=odd
We have 1009 numbers even and so odd. Then, if we separe odd numbers and even ones: 》Odd sum = odd (1009 is odd and odd plus odd, odd times= odd number) 》Even sum= even (even numbers always sum even) 》Even sum + odd sum =odd number (a great number) 》Even sum - odd sum= odd number. If we do this step the result will be exactly 1009.
As you can see, there is no way to rearrange the numbers to get an even number. To get to the answer, you separe the number +- 1 and change the signal of the 2 first pairs (1,2) and (3,4)
(-1+2)+(-3+4)+(-5+6)+...+(2017-2018)
(-1+2)+(-3+4)... -> 1 (-2-3-4) -> 1 + (-9) -> (-8)+(-5+6)+...+(2017-2018) = 1001
Assume that we put negative sign for all odd numbers and taking the sum gives 1 0 0 9 (i.e., E v e n − O d d = 2 2 0 1 8 = 1 0 0 9 )which is closer to the options 1000 and 1001. Now putting a negative on the number eight gives you the sum 1 0 0 1 .
I first put the numbers into pairs.
So you have:
1 + 2018 = 2019
2 + 2017 = 2019
... and so on.
2018/2 = 1009.
Therefore there are 1009 of these pairs. These pairs can cancel each other out.
+1 + 2018 - 2 - 2017 = 0
But there is an odd number of pairs. If everything else equals to 0 then the surplus pair must be the one that gives us the actual value.
What do we know about this pair? Well, firstly it must give
a + b = 2019
Now it is only a matter of finding which numbers that add up to 2019 can also minus to give 4, 1000, 1001 or 2018. They have to have that precise difference.
(a + 4) + a = 2019 gives us a non-integer value for a, meaning it cannot be part of the pair, since the values are all integers.
So does
(a + 1000) + a = 2019
and
(a + 2018) + a = 2019
1001 has to be the answer.
(a + 1001) + a = 2019
a = 509
Here, a is an integer. Therefore 1001 is the only possible answer.
Any four consecutive integers can be added/subtracted to get zero. We have 2018 numbers in sequence, which mod 4 gives us two. Two consecutive integers give us one as a difference, so our result will always be odd (swapping adding a number for subtracting, changes the result by twice the number, thus keeping parity).
The only odd number in the choice of answers is 1001, so that must be our only choice.
Let’s argue by using the parity of the sum/difference on the left hand side.
We have 1009 even numbers, and 1009 odd numbers.
Sum and difference of two odd and/or even numbers results in an even number.
Since we have an odd number of odd numbers, it follows that the result from finite addition/subtraction will be odd a number.
So the only possible result is 1001.
Every time you wrote 1018, you meant 1009.
Log in to reply
Oh, such a stupid mistake! Thanks for mentioning, it´s fixed yet.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
In the set of 2 0 1 8 integers, 1 0 0 9 are even, and 1 0 0 9 are odd.
± 2 ± 4 ± 6 ± … ± 2 0 1 6 ± 2 0 1 8 results in an even number.
± 1 ± 3 ± 5 ± … ± 2 0 1 5 ± 2 0 1 7 results in an odd number, as there are an odd number of these exclusively odd numbers.
Adding the even number to the odd number results in an odd number therefore the answer must be odd, and the only odd option is 1 0 0 1 .