Find x ∈ R so that x 2 x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 + x 3 + x x 4 − 4 x 2 + 1 = 4 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice solution! By the way, do you think that you can solve this problem the Ineq way? I think that the Poly way is a little bit too long.
Log in to reply
The polynomial method was the first one that came to my mind. But, your solution using inequalities was also fantastic! Great problem!
I've seen solutions from @Rahil Sehgal and @Chew-Seong Cheong, and both of them solved this problem the Poly way, so I think that I should post an Ineq solution for the sake of completeness (if this solution is wrong, the Poly way is the only way). Please check out for any mistakes!
So it's easily seen that x = 0 must not be the solution, else LHS is undefined.
We can see that x 2 x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 = 1 + x 2 ( x 2 + 1 ) 2 = ( x x 2 + 1 ) 2 + 1 ≥ 4 + 1 = 5 .
Also, x 3 + x x 4 − 4 x 2 + 1 = 1 + x ( x 2 + 1 ) ( x 2 + 1 ) 2 − x ( x 2 + 1 ) 6 x 2 = x x 2 + 1 − x 2 + 1 6 x ≥ 2 − 3 = − 1 .
= > x 2 x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 + x 3 + x x 4 − 4 x 2 + 1 ≥ 5 − 1 = 4 .
Equality holds iff (if and only if) x = 1 .
And if anyone sees this, I use x 2 + 1 ≥ 2 x and x = 0 to solve the problem. Any flaws? (Found one)
Edit: Seems like this can only be true if x > 0 . So we will have to prove that x > 0 for this solution to be complete. Any help?
Nope! No flaw at all! Very creative solution!
Good solution.
How is x x 2 + 1 ≥ 2 ? We are not given that x is positive.
Log in to reply
So what? He's not using AM-Gm at all. it's just expanding (x-1)^2
Log in to reply
x 2 + 1 ≥ 2 x for all reals x , but x x 2 + 1 may not be ≥ 2 ; division by x is permitted only if x > 0 .
Log in to reply
@Shourya Pandey – Thanks for the complaint! By the way, can you prove that x > 0 ?
Log in to reply
@Steven Jim – I tried that for about half an hour; I'll keep trying :P
Log in to reply
@Shourya Pandey – Okay... I'm trying too :P Thanks anyways! :))))))
Log in to reply
@Steven Jim – Ah curses. Shourya is right. One needs to assume x>0 first.
I don't see an elegant way of proving that x>0. The best I could come up with is via proving with calculus (set d/dx = 0, show that d^2 /dx^2 > 0 ), but it's bad...
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – So any way of proving x > 0 without Calculus?
Log in to reply
What expression?
x 2 x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 + x 3 + x x 4 − 4 x 2 + 1 = 4 .
⇒ x 4 + x 2 ( x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 ) ( x 2 + 1 ) + ( x 4 − 4 x 2 + 1 ) ( x ) = 4
⇒ ( x 6 + 3 x 4 + x 2 + x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 ) + ( x 5 − 4 x 3 + x ) + ( − 4 x 4 − 4 x 2 ) = 0
⇒ x 6 + x 5 − 4 x 3 + x + 1 = 0
⇒ ( x − 1 ) 2 ( x 4 + 3 x 3 + 5 x 2 + 3 x + 1 ) = 0
Therefore, the answer is x = 1
For completeness, you should justify why the 2nd term has no real roots.
Nice solution!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
x 2 x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 + x 3 + x x 4 − 4 x 2 + 1 x 2 + 3 + x 2 1 + x ( x 2 + 1 ) ( x 2 + 1 ) 2 − 6 x 2 x 2 + 3 + x 2 1 + x x 2 + 1 − x 2 + 1 6 x x 2 − 1 + x 2 1 + x + x 1 − x + x 1 6 ( x + x 1 ) 2 + x + x 1 − 3 − x + x 1 6 y 2 + y − 3 − y 6 y 3 + y 2 − 3 y − 6 ( y − 2 ) ( y 2 + 3 y + 3 ) ⟹ y x + x 1 ⟹ x = 4 = 4 = 4 = 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 = 2 = 2 = 1 Let y = x + x 1 y 2 + 3 y + 3 has no real root.