Let P ( x ) be the polynomial equivalent to the quotient x 2 4 + 2 x 2 3 + 3 x 2 2 + 4 x 2 1 + ⋯ + 2 4 x + 2 5 x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5
Express your answer as the sum of the coefficients of P ( x ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Awesome solution.
The sum of coefficients of any polynomial P(x) will be equal to P(1).As it would add only the coefficients and will not be affected by the index of variable. Putting x=1 in the whole division, in numerator,we get; 1^2-26+25=0; Thus,P(1)=0 and the sum of coefficients is zero.
Working from the geometric series formula gives us that: x − 1 x 2 6 − 1 = x 2 5 + x 2 4 + x 2 3 + ⋯ + x + 1
x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 = x 2 6 − 1 − 2 6 x + 2 6 = x 2 6 − 1 − 2 6 ( x − 1 )
x − 1 x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 = x 2 5 + x 2 4 + x 2 3 + ⋯ + x + 1 − 2 6
x − 1 x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 = x 2 5 + x 2 4 + x 2 3 + ⋯ + x − 2 5
This gives us the idea to try multiplying the denominator by x − 1 .
( x − 1 ) ( x 2 4 + 2 x 2 3 + 3 x 2 2 + 4 x 2 1 + ⋯ + 2 4 x + 2 5 ) = ( x 2 5 + 2 x 2 4 + 3 x 2 3 + 4 x 2 2 + ⋯ + 2 4 x 2 + 2 5 x ) − ( x 2 4 + 2 x 2 3 + 3 x 2 2 + 4 x 2 1 + ⋯ + 2 4 x + 2 5 )
= x 2 5 + ( 2 x 2 4 − x 2 4 ) + ( 3 x 2 3 − 2 x 2 3 ) + ( 4 x 2 2 − 3 x 2 2 ) + ⋯ + ( 2 5 x − 2 4 x ) − 2 5
= x 2 5 + x 2 4 + x 2 3 + ⋯ + x − 2 5
Now we combine our results: x − 1 x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 = x 2 5 + x 2 4 + x 2 3 + ⋯ + x − 2 5
( x − 1 ) ( x 2 4 + 2 x 2 3 + 3 x 2 2 + 4 x 2 1 + ⋯ + 2 4 x + 2 5 ) = x 2 5 + x 2 4 + x 2 3 + ⋯ + x − 2 5
x − 1 x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 = ( x − 1 ) ( x 2 4 + 2 x 2 3 + 3 x 2 2 + 4 x 2 1 + ⋯ + 2 4 x + 2 5 )
x 2 4 + 2 x 2 3 + 3 x 2 2 + 4 x 2 1 + ⋯ + 2 4 x + 2 5 x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 = ( x − 1 ) 2 = x 2 − 2 x + 1 So the sum of the coefficients is 0 .
An alternate approach. The quotient will be a second-order polynomial:
D ( x ) N ( x ) = A x 2 + B x + C
Plugging in three distinct values for x yields three linear equations to solve for ( A , B , C ) . For example, I plugged in -1, 1, and 2 for x. Solving the linear system yields ( A , B , C ) = ( 1 , − 2 , 1 )
Log in to reply
@Steven Chase OR, Sir, we can see that the question actually asks for the value of Q(1)....... Here Q(x) is the quotient obtained by the expression given...........Therefore, simply putting x=1 in the expression gives the desired answer!!!!!!
Log in to reply
There's a slight error in your reasoning. Can you spot the gap and figure out how to fix it?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Mine or his?
Log in to reply
@Steven Chase – Sortof both. The point I wanted to make was to avoid a 0 0 scenario. In Aaghaz's case, this cannot be fixed (because he needed to use the x=1 cases), whereas for yours it can be fixed by plugging in different test values.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – I see. Yes, any three values will do, as long as they don't yield undefined cases or impractically large numbers. The cool thing about using x = (-1,1,2) is that the ratios were integers too, as I recall.
There is a slight mistake in your Final Answer: It should be x^2 - 2x + 1 and not x^2 - 2x - 1
Just doing the polynomial division: ∑ i = 1 2 5 i x 2 5 − i x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 = x 2 − 2 x + 1 remainder 0 .
We can see that the question actually asks for the value of Q(1)....... Here Q(x) is the quotient obtained by the expression given...........Therefore, simply putting x=1 in the expression gives the desired answer!!!!!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Given that P ( x ) = x 2 4 + 2 x 2 3 + 3 x 2 2 + 4 x 2 1 + ⋯ + 2 4 x + 2 5 x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 , this means that P ( x ) has a degree of 2. Let P ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c . Now consider:
P ( 0 ) P ( 1 ) P ( − 1 ) = 2 5 2 5 = 1 = 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + 2 5 1 − 2 6 + 2 5 = 0 = = − 1 1 − 2 + = − 1 3 − 4 + ⋯ + = − 1 2 3 − 2 4 + 2 5 1 + 2 6 + 2 5 = − 1 2 + 2 5 5 2 = 1 3 5 2 = 4 ⟹ P ( 0 ) = c ⟹ c = 1 ⟹ P ( 1 ) = a + b + 1 = 0 . . . ( 1 ) ⟹ P ( − 1 ) = a − b + 1 = 4 . . . ( 2 )
From ( 1 ) + ( 2 ) : 2 a + 2 = 4 ⟹ a = 1 and ( 1 ) : 1 + b + 1 = 0 ⟹ b = − 2 . Therefore, P ( x ) = x 2 − 2 x + 1 and the sum of coefficients is 1 − 2 + 1 = 0 .
Let us prove that P ( x ) = S x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 = x 2 − 2 x + 1 , where S = x 2 4 + 2 x 2 3 + 3 x 2 2 + 4 x 2 1 + ⋯ + 2 4 x + 2 5 , by showing ( x 2 − 2 x + 1 ) S = x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 .
S x S x 2 S ( x 2 − x ) S ( − x + 1 ) S ( x 2 − 2 x + 1 ) S = x 2 4 + 2 x 2 3 + 3 x 2 2 + 4 x 2 1 + ⋯ + 2 4 x + 2 5 = x 2 5 + 2 x 2 4 + 3 x 2 3 + 4 x 2 2 + ⋯ + 2 4 x 2 + 2 5 x = x 2 6 + 2 x 2 5 + 3 x 2 4 + 4 x 2 3 + ⋯ + 2 4 x 3 + 2 5 x 2 = x 2 6 + x 2 5 + x 2 4 + x 2 3 + ⋯ + x 2 − 2 5 x = − x 2 5 − x 2 4 − x 2 3 − x 2 2 − ⋯ − x + 2 5 = x 2 6 − 2 6 x + 2 5 . . . ( 1 ) . . . ( 2 ) . . . ( 3 ) . . . ( 3 ) − ( 2 ) = ( 4 ) . . . ( 1 ) − ( 2 ) = ( 5 ) . . . ( 4 ) + ( 5 )
Proving P ( x ) = x 2 − 2 x + 1 .