Consider a particle of mass m in potential-free space moving from ( x , y ) = ( − 1 , 0 ) to ( x , y ) = ( 1 , 0 ) over a parabolic path. Suppose we have no "a priori" notions about the physicality of such a path.
x ( t ) = − 1 + v t y ( t ) = α ( 1 − x 2 ( t ) ) 0 ≤ t ≤ v 2 = t f
Note that the starting and ending points of this path (in space and time) are independent of α .
The kinetic energy, potential energy, and action for the path are:
E ( t ) = 2 1 m ( x ˙ 2 ( t ) + y ˙ 2 ( t ) ) U ( t ) = 0 S = ∫ 0 t f ( E ( t ) − U ( t ) ) d t
Suppose we make a graph of d α d S vs. α , with d α d S on the vertical axis and α on the horizontal axis. As it turns out, this plot is a straight line.
If α 0 is the value of α at which d α d S = 0 , and M is the slope of the graph, give your answer as the sum of α 0 and M . What is the significance of the numerical value of α 0 ?
Note: This problem is fairly easy to do by hand
Details and Assumptions:
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Well, I would phrase the significance of α o as such: In a potential free environment, the physical path between the initial and final points corresponds to the shortest distance between the given points (a straight line). In other words, minimising the action is the same as finding the path of shortest distance between the two given points provided no external conservative force acts on the particle.
Log in to reply
Yeah, Fermat's Principle.
Log in to reply
Interesting analogy. However, Fermat's principle is not based on minimising distance. It is based on the minimum time taken by light to traverse between two given points.
Log in to reply
@Karan Chatrath – Not geometrical, but optical distance. Which of course appears from minimizing time. The famous Brachistochrone Principle
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Yes, I think it was solved by Jacob Bernoulli. Maybe even before that? Either way, Bernoulli posed a very interesting solution to it. The cycloid!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
After a little calculation, we get S = m v ( 1 + 3 4 α 2 ) , d α d S = 3 8 m v α . So d α d S = 0 ⇒ α = α 0 = 0 . Also M = 3 8 m v . So α 0 + M = 3 8 m v = 3 8 0 ≈ 2 6 . 6 7 .
α 0 = 0 signifies that the least action path is y = 0 or the x -axis.