Potential-Free Parabola?

Consider a particle of mass m m in potential-free space moving from ( x , y ) = ( 1 , 0 ) (x,y) = (-1,0) to ( x , y ) = ( 1 , 0 ) (x,y) = (1,0) over a parabolic path. Suppose we have no "a priori" notions about the physicality of such a path.

x ( t ) = 1 + v t y ( t ) = α ( 1 x 2 ( t ) ) 0 t 2 v = t f x(t) = -1 + v t \\ y(t) = \alpha \Big(1 - x^2(t) \Big) \\ 0 \leq t \leq \frac{2}{v} = t_f

Note that the starting and ending points of this path (in space and time) are independent of α \alpha .

The kinetic energy, potential energy, and action for the path are:

E ( t ) = 1 2 m ( x ˙ 2 ( t ) + y ˙ 2 ( t ) ) U ( t ) = 0 S = 0 t f ( E ( t ) U ( t ) ) d t E(t) = \frac{1}{2} m \Big(\dot{x}^2 (t) + \dot{y}^2 (t) \Big) \\ U(t) = 0 \\ S = \int_0^{t_f} \Big(E(t) - U(t) \Big) \, dt

Suppose we make a graph of d S d α \large{\frac{d S}{d \alpha}} vs. α \alpha , with d S d α \large{\frac{d S}{d \alpha}} on the vertical axis and α \alpha on the horizontal axis. As it turns out, this plot is a straight line.

If α 0 \alpha_0 is the value of α \alpha at which d S d α = 0 \large{\frac{d S}{d \alpha} = 0} , and M M is the slope of the graph, give your answer as the sum of α 0 \alpha_0 and M M . What is the significance of the numerical value of α 0 \alpha_0 ?

Note: This problem is fairly easy to do by hand

Details and Assumptions:

  • m = 2 m = 2
  • v = 5 v = 5


The answer is 26.67.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

After a little calculation, we get S = m v ( 1 + 4 3 α 2 ) , d S d α = 8 3 m v α S=mv(1+\dfrac{4}{3}α^2),\dfrac{dS}{dα}=\dfrac{8}{3}mvα . So d S d α = 0 α = α 0 = 0 \dfrac{dS}{dα}=0\Rightarrow α=α_0=0 . Also M = 8 3 m v M=\dfrac{8}{3}mv . So α 0 + M = 8 3 m v = 80 3 26.67 α_0+M=\dfrac{8}{3}mv=\dfrac{80}{3}\approx \boxed {26.67} .

α 0 = 0 α_0=0 signifies that the least action path is y = 0 y=0 or the x x -axis.

Well, I would phrase the significance of α o \alpha_o as such: In a potential free environment, the physical path between the initial and final points corresponds to the shortest distance between the given points (a straight line). In other words, minimising the action is the same as finding the path of shortest distance between the two given points provided no external conservative force acts on the particle.

Karan Chatrath - 1 year, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah, Fermat's Principle.

A Former Brilliant Member - 1 year, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Interesting analogy. However, Fermat's principle is not based on minimising distance. It is based on the minimum time taken by light to traverse between two given points.

Karan Chatrath - 1 year, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath Not geometrical, but optical distance. Which of course appears from minimizing time. The famous Brachistochrone Principle

A Former Brilliant Member - 1 year, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member Yes, I think it was solved by Jacob Bernoulli. Maybe even before that? Either way, Bernoulli posed a very interesting solution to it. The cycloid!

Krishna Karthik - 1 year, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...