Let x , y , z be positive real numbers such that x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 2 ( x y + y z + z x ) . Find the minimum value of
z x + y + x y + z + y z + x .
Write your answer to 3 decimal places.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You said that x = y + z but why compute z = ( x + y ) 2 ? Although it doesn't matter...
Very interesting question.
Some pointers.
Log in to reply
Sir, so if use x = y + z correctly, we can continue doing that and state that minimum reached at y=z?
Log in to reply
Ah haha. I got mixed up with the wrong substitution.
You are right to say that equality is achieved at (say) x = 4 , y = 1 , z = 1 . Let me revert point 3.
About number 4, I know. That's the better way, but I think that not many people know they can get x = y + z from x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 2 ( x y + y z + z x ) without using Heron's formula (for me, I am not allowed to use this until 10th grade), so I want to post this problem and also this for people to understand it.
Besides, isn't it a 4 + b 4 + c 4 − 2 ( a 2 b 2 + b 2 c 2 + c 2 a 2 ) = ( a + b + c ) ( a + b − c ) ( a − b + c ) ( a − b − c ) ?
(=\frac { z+y }{ { (\sqrt { z } +\sqrt { y } ) }^{ 2 } } is greater than half ? How
Actually I'm getting the answer as − 3 . Let me explain it... Please tell whether it is correct or not. To reduce typing as I'm not too good at latex, I'll skip some steps...please forgive me for that...but I got the answer by just mere simplification.
I write the given data as ( x + y + z ) 2 = 4 ( x y + y z + z x )
So this must mean that ( x + y + z ) > 0 Let this be ( i ) and ( x y + y z + z x ) > 0 , let this be ( i i ) because they are all positive real numbers. I'll keep this aside for the time being.
Now If we simplify the expression for which min value is asked, we get, x y z x 2 y + x y 2 + y 2 z + z 2 y + z 2 x + z x 2
Again we'll go back... Let me multiply ( i ) and ( i i ) . Hence I'll be getting x 2 y + x y 2 + y 2 z + z 2 y + z 2 x + z x 2 + 3 x y z > 0 .
Dividing throughout by x y z , we get,
x y z x 2 y + x y 2 + y 2 z + z 2 y + z 2 x + z x 2 + 3 > 0
Hence, x y z x 2 y + x y 2 + y 2 z + z 2 y + z 2 x + z x 2 > − 3
Which is the required answer. Anything wrong in this? @Calvin Lin , can you please check it out?
Log in to reply
As always, when you want to prove that something is a minimum, you need to show that 1) It is a lower bound and 2) It can be achieved.
You have shown 1), but not 2).
E.g. it is true that x 2 + ( x + 1 ) 2 ≥ 0 + 0 . Is the minimium value 0?
Log in to reply
Umm... I didn't get "It can be achieved". And are you sure about the example you have given? I mean for what value of x the is become 0? Since you have put 'greater than and equal to'...
Log in to reply
@Skanda Prasad – What is the minimum value of x 2 + ( x + 1 ) 2 ?
Note: My point is that the minimum is not 0, even though we can show that it is ≥ 0 .
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Oh I didn't get the meaning...min value is 1
Log in to reply
@Skanda Prasad – How do you show that the minimum is 1? Make sure you do both 1) and 2).
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – I show it as "since the 2 terms are squared, they have to be either 0 or positive. If I try to make one term 0 the other attains the value 1. and for no other values the answer is less than 1
Log in to reply
@Skanda Prasad – Go think about it more. This is a basic concept that you should already know. Check out quadratic polynomial inequalities .
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Yeah I checked it out...and I got your point...I was wrong...my bad
@Calvin Lin – Actually one more arguement I thought to counter myself is that x,y and z are all positive reals therefore the value asked has to be positive...and I'm getting a negative answer
Log in to reply
@Skanda Prasad – Precisely. It is obvious that the expression is > 0 . Hence, we can conclude that the minimum is not -3. In particular, even though -3 is a lower bound, it cannot be achieved.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Yeah, and as I asked before, is there any way to carry on from the place where I've left or is the approach is completely wrong?
I'm getting the feeling that I'm wrong from beginning...but I just couldn't see why it is wrong...
Say I know only one method to solve this problem which is my method, after that how do I prove that 'it can be achieved'. Is there any way to carry on from the place where I've ended?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Assume that x ≥ y ≥ z
⇒ x 2 + ( y + z ) 2 ( x − y − z ) 2 = 2 ( x y + x z ) + 4 y z = 4 y z
Case 1: x = y + z + 2 y z
⇒ x = y + z
Case 2: y + z = x + 2 y z
( y − z ) 2 = x ⇒ z ⇒ y = y + x or = x + z
But x ≥ y ≥ z and x , y , z can't be 0, so it is only possible that x = y + z .
We have
z x + y + x y + z + y z + x = ( z + y ) 2 z + y + z ( z + y ) 2 + y + y ( z + y ) 2 + z ≥ 2 1 + z 2 y + z + 2 z y + y 2 z + y + 2 z y = 2 1 + 2 + 2 ( y z + z y ) + 2 ( y z + z y ) ≥ 1 0 . 5