PRMO Problem (I found it online)

x , y , z x,y,z are distinct non-negative integers such that x y + z = 160 xy + z = 160 . Find the least possible value of x + y z x + yz .


The answer is 1.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Non negative, so they can be 0.

If y = 0, then whatever x is, z needs to be 160. The least possible value for x is 1, as y is already 0, so x = 1 and z = 160.

x + yz computes to 1, which is our answer.

Hi, you should mention that x , y and z x, y \text{ and } z are distinct postive integers, as else x = y = 0 x = y = 0 and z = 160 z = 160 gives answer 0 0 .

Aryan Sanghi - 8 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

Thanks. I've updated the answer to 0 . Those who previously answered 0 has been marked correct.

In the future, if you have concerns about a problem's wording/clarity/etc., you can report the problem. See how here .

Brilliant Mathematics Staff - 8 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

Thanks, but that wasn't to be the problem. I actually forgot to mention 'distinct' non-negative integers :)

Please change the answer back to normal, as I have edited the problem.

A Former Brilliant Member - 8 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member Done. \quad

Brilliant Mathematics Staff - 8 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@Brilliant Mathematics Thanks for the help!

A Former Brilliant Member - 8 months, 1 week ago

@Brilliant Mathematics Looks like there is a glitch. I had answered 1 initially which was taken as correct, but when the answer was changed to 0 it was then considered incorrect. Now the answer is back to 1, but my initial try of 1 is not considered correct and I can’t re-answer with 1 (I tried 0 and 50 on my next two attempts just to see what would happen). Not a big deal but I’m guessing others are experiencing the same issue.

A Former Brilliant Member - 8 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member Hi Brian, I've given you credit for answering this problem.

Brilliant Mathematics Staff - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

If instead the integers must be positive rather than simply non-negative I find a minimum of 50, with x = 26, y = 6, z = 4.

A Former Brilliant Member - 8 months, 1 week ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...