Consider,
ψ
(
a
)
=
a
+
a
+
a
+
…
.
Evaluate: x → 0 lim 1 − ψ ( x 2 ) 1 − ψ ( 1 − cos x )
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
What is we take minus sign of the function....in the question 'a' is tending to zero so if we take left hand limit we have to take -ve sign because the term inside root would be smaller than 1
Log in to reply
You pointed out an important idea.. You said that if a is negative then we should take the negative sign in the quadratic formula, but note that x is tending to zero, not a . I will edit my solution just for explaining why we used the positive sign, read it.
If we directly put the x=0 in the equation we get the answer as one....where this has gone wrong??
Log in to reply
The function f(a) is not continuous at a = 0, although its limit exists = 1. So, you can't possibly directly substitute the values!
Well... Recall the definition of a continuous function: A function is continuous on interval I If and only if lim x → a f ( x ) = f ( a ) ∀ a ∈ I . I will prove now that ψ ( a ) is discontinuous at 0 .
Using our new expression of ψ (reduced), we plug zero to get two values : ψ ( 0 ) = 0 and ψ ( 0 ) = 1 . Now to find the limit as a tends to zero of ψ , we should check both right and left handed limits:
lim a → 0 + ψ ( a ) = 1 (We used the expression of ψ for the positive domain , see the last part of my solution)
lim a → 0 − ψ ( a ) = 0 (We used the expression of ψ for the negative domain)
This implies that the limit doesn't exist, from which we conclude that ψ is discontinuous at zero , Thus we can't use direct substitution to evaluate this limit.
Log in to reply
I am not sure, but if limit doesn't exist.. we shouldn't be able to evaluate limit! As I have explained above, limit does exist (each being equal to 1), but it is not equal to f(0) = 0. Therefore, as u rightly pointed out... it is not continuous at a = 0. Cheers.
Log in to reply
@Saket Sharma – If limit exists, prove it, or point out where is the mistake when I proved that it does not ( right handed and left handed limits don't exist)
You are right when you said that "if limit doesn't exist.. we shouldn't be able to evaluate limit!" , but note that the arguments of ψ are positive hence we are evaluating the right handed limit which exists as 1 .
L'hospital's isn't that messy in this case anyways!!
whats the mistake in this the expression w(1- cosx) limit x tends to zero becomes o and similarly for x^2 o therefore ans 1
Why it has to be ( 1 − 4 a + 1 ) / 2 for (-1/4, 0)?? Why can't it be same as for (0, inf) ... ( 1 + 4 a + 1 ) / 2 ??
Isn't it possible that ( 1 − 4 a + 1 ) / 2 is a totally extraneous root which we obtained because of squaring??
Log in to reply
Well suppose that ψ ( a ) = 2 1 − 4 a + 1 for [ 0 , ∞ [
a > 0 = > 4 a + 1 > 1 = > ψ < 0 which is rejected.
Log in to reply
I meant to ask about the other one.
For ( 0 , ∞ ) , it's logical to choose +ve sign such that
ψ ( a ) = 2 1 + 1 + 4 a , a > 0
But what makes you choose -ve sign for [ − 4 1 , 0 ) ?? Why don't we take the following? Any logic?
ψ ( a ) = 2 1 + 1 + 4 a , a ϵ [ − 4 1 , 0 )
Further, yet another doubt has come to my mind: Is the function defined for a < 0??
Although it goes to ∞ , still somewhere it would encounter root of a -ve number. So, it should NOT be defined for a < 0 at all.
Log in to reply
@Saket Sharma – Ahh yes it shouldn't be defined for negative arguments... Thanks for pointing out that, I will edits this fault :)
Hold your horses for a moment.
N N N N . . . = N
Proof:
N N N N . . . = N
⇒ N N N N . . . = N 2
⇒ N ⋅ N = N 2
⇒ N 2 = N 2 ,
∀ N .
So,
ψ ( a ) = a .
Thus,
x → 0 lim 1 − ψ ( x 2 ) 1 − ψ ( 1 − cos x ) = x → 0 lim 1 − x 2 1 − ( 1 − cos x ) = 1 − 0 2 1 − ( 1 − 1 ) = 1
What went wrong?
your identity holds if N is multiplied by the next root sign, not when it is added to it.
That is, you can apply your identity if ψ ( a ) = a a a ⋯ , and our ψ is a + a + a + ⋯ .
L-H rule as well as RATIONALIZE is a real pain .... use the approximation (1+x)^n=1+nx .........done in 2 steps :P
Firstly I worked upon the root expression but later I found no use of it . I blindly use L'hosptal rule and find that is works . Thus answer is 0.5. :)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
First we simplify ψ ( a ) :
ψ ( a ) = a + a + a + ⋯ = a + ψ ( a )
= > [ ψ ( a ) ] 2 − ψ ( a ) − a = 0 , this is a quadratic equation can be solved easily : ψ ( a ) = 2 1 + 4 a + 1 (we took the positive value)*
Now we write our limit and rearrange it :
x → 0 lim 1 − ψ ( x 2 ) 1 − ψ ( 1 − cos x ) = x → 0 lim 1 − 4 x 2 + 1 1 − 5 − 4 cos x
L'Hopital rule seems messy, so rewrite our limit as:
x → 0 lim 1 − 4 x 2 + 1 1 − 5 − 4 cos x
= x → 0 lim 1 + 5 − 4 cos x 1 + 4 x 2 + 1 1 + 4 x 2 + 1 1 + 5 − 4 cos x 1 − 4 x 2 + 1 1 − 5 − 4 cos x
= x → 0 lim 1 + 5 − 4 cos x 1 + 4 x 2 + 1 × x → 0 lim 1 + 4 x 2 + 1 1 + 5 − 4 cos x 1 − 4 x 2 + 1 1 − 5 − 4 cos x
= 2 2 x → 0 lim 1 − ( 4 x 2 + 1 ) 1 − ( 5 − 4 cos x ) = x → 0 lim x 2 1 − cos x = x → 0 lim x 2 ( 1 + cos x ) sin 2 x
= lim x → 0 ( 1 + cos x ) ( lim x → 0 x sin x ) 2 = 2 1
Note that the domain of our ψ is [ 0 , ∞ [ . we know from the quadratic formula that ψ ( a ) = 2 1 + 4 a + 1 or ψ ( a ) = 2 1 − 4 a + 1
Using the fact that ψ is positive for all a , we can't use \(\psi (a) = \frac{1-\sqrt{4a+1}}{2} unless a = 0 hence:
ψ ( a ) = 2 1 + 4 a + 1 If a ∈ ] 0 , ∞ [
and
ψ ( a ) = 2 1 ± 4 a + 1 If a = 0 .