1 − 7 1 + 9 1 − 1 5 1 + 1 7 1 − 2 3 1 + 2 5 1 − … = ?
Clarification : Both { 1 , 9 , 1 7 , 2 5 , … } and { 7 , 1 5 , 2 3 , … } are arithmetic progressions.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This is fantastic!
Oh nicely done the integration part! +1
I did it using digamma function. There is a definite method to do such summations using polygamma functions which is very easy to understand and is usually preferred.
Nice ! The way you used the integral was just amazing. Upvoted ! : )
Log in to reply
Thanx keshav, was ur method different, if so plz do reply
Log in to reply
Actually I made this question from a paragraph type question ,i saw in apaper. It's actually the sum of two different logarithmic(or exponential series, i don't remember) . Unfortunately i don't have that paper any more . Btw are taking a drop or ?
Log in to reply
@Keshav Tiwari – nope , i'm not , just like solving problems
Log in to reply
@Tanishq Varshney – okay . Good for you !! :)
It seems great, but the series ∑ r = 1 ∞ 8 r − 7 1 and ∑ r = 1 ∞ 8 r − 1 1 don't converge. So, there should be something wrong with this proof. To correct this proof, it would be better to write down only one series: ∑ r = 1 ∞ ( 8 r − 7 1 − 8 r − 1 1 ) and then to get only one integral, and so forth. The rest seems to be rigth.
It seems great, but the series ∑ r = 1 ∞ 8 r − 7 1 and ∑ r = 1 ∞ 8 r − 1 1 don't converge. So, there should be something wrong with this proof. To correct this proof, it would be better to write down only one series: ∑ r = 1 ∞ ( 8 r − 7 1 − 8 r − 1 1 ) and then to get only one integral, and so forth. The rest seems to be right.
@Keshav Tiwari I seperated the one and interpreted the n'th term as 2 n + 1 1 − 2 n − 1 1 .... Where sum starts from n=3 ..... How do you justify the uniqueness of the n'th term
I will give a general method how to solve "such" problems.
Suppose we have a summation like the following -
n = 1 ∑ ∞ s 1 , n s 2 , n s 3 , n a n
where
a n is a linear equation in n .
s 1 , n = ( n + α 1 ) ( n + α 2 ) ⋯ ( n + α p )
s 2 , n = ( n + β 1 ) 2 ( n + β 2 ) 2 ⋯ ( n + β q ) 2
s 3 , n = ( n + γ 1 ) 3 ( n + γ 2 ) 3 ⋯ ( n + γ r ) 3
and we can change into partial fractions -
i = 1 ∑ p n + α i c 1 , i + j = 1 ∑ q n + β j c 2 , j + j = 1 ∑ q ( n + β j ) 2 c ′ 2 , j + k = 1 ∑ r n + γ k c 3 , k + k = 1 ∑ r ( n + γ k ) 2 c ′ 3 , k + k = 1 ∑ r ( n + γ k ) 2 c ′ ′ 3 , k
Then, the value of sum is
− i = 1 ∑ p c 1 , i ψ ( 1 + α i ) − j = 1 ∑ q c 2 , j ψ ( 1 + α j ) + j = 1 ∑ q c ′ 2 , j ψ ′ ( 1 + α j ) − k = 1 ∑ r c 3 , k ψ ( 1 + α k ) + k = 1 ∑ r c ′ 3 , k ψ ′ ( 1 + α k ) − k = 1 ∑ r 2 c ′ ′ 3 , k ψ ′ ′ ( 1 + α k )
Courtesy: Abramowitz and Stegun
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
On rearranging
( 1 + 9 1 + 1 7 1 + . . . ) − ( 7 1 + 1 5 1 + . . . . )
r = 1 ∑ ∞ 8 r − 7 1 − r = 1 ∑ ∞ 8 r − 1 1
r = 1 ∑ ∞ ∫ 0 1 x 8 r − 8 d x − r = 1 ∑ ∞ ∫ 0 1 x 8 r − 2 d x
∫ 0 1 r = 1 ∑ ∞ x 8 ( r − 1 ) d x − ∫ 0 1 r = 1 ∑ ∞ x 8 r − 2 d x
∫ 0 1 1 − x 8 1 d x − ∫ 0 1 1 − x 8 x 6 d x
∫ 0 1 1 − x 8 1 − x 6 d x =
∫ 0 1 2 ( x 2 + 1 ) 1 d x + 2 ( x 4 + 1 ) x 2 + 1 d x
∫ 0 1 2 ( x 2 + 1 ) 1 d x + ∫ 0 1 2 1 ( x − x 1 ) 2 + 2 1 + x 2 1 d x
we finally get answer as
8 π + 4 2 π = 0 . 9 4 8