f ( 5 0 ) = 3
f ( 3 1 ) = 5
f ( 2 7 3 0 ) = 6
f ( 3 8 4 ) = 2
What is f ( 2 0 1 4 ) ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
What's wrong with f ( x ) = − 1 9 0 0 6 8 6 3 8 5 2 8 4 1 6 8 0 2 0 2 7 8 7 4 7 7 3 x 3 + 1 2 6 7 1 2 4 2 5 6 8 5 6 1 1 2 4 2 9 9 6 8 1 2 7 9 3 9 x 2 − 9 5 0 3 4 3 1 9 2 6 4 2 0 8 4 0 1 2 5 6 4 8 6 0 5 2 8 9 1 9 1 1 x + 7 9 1 9 5 2 6 6 0 5 3 5 0 6 9 4 9 9 5 3 1 8 3 1 9 2 8 6 ? One can construct infinitely many f ( x ) using Lagrange Interpolation, thus giving infinitely many choices for f ( 2 0 1 4 ) . This is why I don't like these problems.
Log in to reply
This is a number theory problem, by the title, so the writer wants us to find a simple pattern, not use wolfram alpha.
Log in to reply
What I'm trying to say is that there are more than one possible answers. The question never stated f ( x ) cannot be a polynomial.
Log in to reply
@Sreejato Bhattacharya – who allows people to add such idiotic questions?
I agree with Sreejato. By newtons interpolation as we get many such functions, there is no uniquenss in the value of the question. Also when mathematics is talked , Sri.Phil Peters, the simplicity is not a matter of concern. Admit what Sreejato pointed out.
Expanding each term in base two, we find that the function counts the number of ones.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Basically f(x) counts the number of 1s in the binary representation of x. So, f ( 2 0 1 4 ) = 9 .