Sum of Two Irrational Numbers

True or False?

The sum of two positive irrational numbers must be irrational.

True False

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

18 solutions

Ron Lauterbach
Sep 17, 2017

Relevant wiki: Rational Numbers - Problem Solving

Take e e and ( 3 e ) (3-e) for instance. e + ( 3 e ) = 3 e+(3-e)=3 Therefore it must not be true. The statement is false.

0.121121112121121112...... is irrational. 0.878878887878878887...... is also irrational. The sum of these two numbers is 0.99999999.... which equals 1, a rational number.

Lowell Beal - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

The sum of two irrational numbers isn't always rational. The sum can be irrational too.

Munem Shahriar - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

The statement remains false though, as you only need one example of contradiction.

Ron Lauterbach - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ron Lauterbach This is the right point. ¨ \ddot \smile

Munem Shahriar - 3 years, 8 months ago

Although this is the right approach, those example numbers appear to repeat, so they look rational from the excerpts given! If I count how many 1s there are before each 2, I see: 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3...

Spicy Brigadoon - 3 years, 8 months ago

But -e is not a positive number. (3-e) is the contraction of (3+(-e)).yes or no?

Phil Robson - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Don't get blinded by contractions when reading an incomprehensible number that is written in a comprehensible form.

You understand that subtracting π \pi from any positive integer greater than π \pi results in a positive irrational number. But because the human mathematical collective hasn't decreed that any of these are important enough to deserve their own symbol that neatly represents each resulting positive irrational number, we rely on a representation that allows for a common understanding, like ( 4 π 4 - \pi ).

Jonathan Quarrie - 3 years, 8 months ago

I Haven't done irrational numbers that much but I thought that added together they could be any number.

Lucia Tiberio - 3 years, 8 months ago

How do we know that e e is not rational?

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

We could assume that it is Euler's Number - e , though the e e in this solution could actually be any positive irrational number less than 3.

Jonathan Quarrie - 3 years, 8 months ago

How is this (and most of the other examples given) not the sum of 3 numbers? Isn't (3-e) an expression describing the sum of two numbers?

Jared Slaydon - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

The square root of 2 is 1.4142135623..... . If you add 0.5857864376...., which is 2 - sqrt(2), you get 1.99999999999.... which is equal to 2.

Lowell Beal - 3 years, 8 months ago

If you subtract e from 3, what do you get? A number, right? That's the meaning of the expression "(3-e)"

Don't confuse the language of math with the meaning of the symbols being represented.

Richard Desper - 3 years, 8 months ago

First of all, it wouldn't be the sum of two numbers as it uses a subtract symbol. However, 3 - e is perfectly acceptable as an irrational number

Stephen Mellor - 3 years, 8 months ago

All counter examples must be of the form x and y-x, where x is a positive irrational number and y is a rational number greater than x. Conversely, any example of this form is a counter example.

Anthony Cutler - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

That's an interesting observation. Can you prove it?

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 3 years, 8 months ago

Great example, thanks!

Tomasz Święcicki - 3 years, 8 months ago

Note 0.1211211 0.1211211\cdots has repeating length of 3 3 . let p = 0.121121121 = 121 1 0 3 1 = 121 999 = rational p= 0.121121121 = \dfrac{121}{10^3 -1}=\dfrac{121}{999}=\text{rational}

Naren Bhandari - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

It's 0.12112111211112...., so it's irrational. The number of 1's in between the 2's is increasing.

JH Yoon - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I see ,as i didn't notice the increment of 1's . :)

Naren Bhandari - 3 years, 8 months ago
Munem Shahriar
Sep 24, 2017

Relevant wiki: Rational Numbers - Problem Solving

  • 2 \sqrt{2} is irrational.

  • ( 8 2 ) (8 - \sqrt{2}) is irrational.

( 8 2 ) + 2 = 8 (8 - \sqrt{2})+ \sqrt{2} = 8

Hence 8 8 is not irrational.

I used the same numbers to have an example

Stefano Gallenda - 3 years, 8 months ago

I thought -√2 is a negative number as in 8+(-√2). I guess my math is a little rusty.

Phil Robson - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

The sum 8 2 8-\sqrt{2} results in an irrational number that is positive. We don't have a standardised form with which to represent this irrational number (like π \pi does), so the easiest way for us to present this irrational number, such that there is a common understanding of what this number is, is to present it as ( 8 2 8-\sqrt{2} ).

Jonathan Quarrie - 3 years, 8 months ago

🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒

Kurosaki SWAIN - 3 years, 8 months ago

I'm sorry does the 2 become a 1? I'm lost. I suck a math 😕

Mary Trueman - 3 years, 8 months ago

That’s a trick question as the sum of two irrationals is always irrational. E.G; Pi + the square root of 2. Cheers

Peter Stiphout - 3 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

You should know better than to assume proof of an affirmative absolute statement by providing the most finite of examples.

It only takes one counter-example against the statement posed in this problem for the answer of False to be the correct answer.

The sum 8 2 8-\sqrt2 results in a positive irrational number. It is a number. It exists. But we don't have infinite time and space to put its pure form down in a solution, so the most succinct way of presenting it is ( 8 2 ) (8-\sqrt2) .

Jonathan Quarrie - 3 years, 7 months ago
Nazmus Sakib
Sep 24, 2017

Relevant wiki: Rational Numbers - Problem Solving

The sum of two positive irrational numbers sometimes Irrational, Sometimes Rational

Example:

X = 8 + 2 X=8+\sqrt{2}

and

Y = 9 2 Y = 9-\sqrt{2}

so,

X + Y X+Y = 8 + 2 + 9 2 8+\sqrt{2}+9-\sqrt{2}

so,

X + Y = 8 + 9 = 17 X+Y=8+9=\boxed{17} (Rational)

Again,

X = 2 + 7 X= 2+\sqrt{7}

Y = 2 + 11 Y=2+\sqrt{11}

So,

X + Y X+Y = 4 + 7 + 11 4+\sqrt{7}+\sqrt{11} (Irrational)

How are these irrational numbers ? Are they not equations with irrational numbers in them ?

Kevoy Young - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

No, these are irrational numbers

  • 4 + 7 4 + \sqrt{7} is irrational.

  • 11 \sqrt{11} is irrational.

  • 8 + 2 8+ \sqrt{2} is irrational.

  • 9 2 9- \sqrt{2} is irrational.

Do you get it?

Nazmus sakib - 3 years, 8 months ago

Seems a little silly, since the only way to add irrational components to achieve a rational is to subtract the exact irrational. Is there any absolute value of an irrational that can be added to another to achieve a rational number?

Christopher Shaw - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I always thought the whole point of an irrational is that there is no such thing as an "absolute" value for an irrational.

Joel Thomas - 3 years, 8 months ago

Your examples are wrong. All examples have to be in the form x+(y-x), where x is an irrational number and y is a rational number greater than x. EX-> x= sqrt(3) y= 7 -> (sqrt(3)) + (7-sqrt(3)) -> 7

Varun Mishra - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Why have to be in the form x+(y-x)?

Nazmus sakib - 3 years, 8 months ago

Just because they're in that form, it doesn't make them wrong. It's the meaning behind the expressions that matters.

Jonathan Quarrie - 3 years, 6 months ago

0.1011011101111011111... + 0.0100100010000100000...=0.1111111111111111111...= 1 9 \frac{1}{9}

good thinking.they are infinite overlapping decimal fraction.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 8 months ago
Yash Ghaghada
Sep 25, 2017

The quick way is counter example

i.e ( k) + (k-∆), where (∆=any irrational) and (k is not irrational)

Kenny O.
Sep 18, 2017

A counter example is: (2- 2 \sqrt2 ) + 2 \sqrt2 =2

Mohammad Khaza
Sep 25, 2017

it can be proved in this way \text{it can be proved in this way}

irrational number +irrational number=rational \text{irrational number +irrational number=rational}

counter example: ( 3 3 ) + 3 = 3 (3-\sqrt3)+\sqrt3=3

The problem states that both numbers must be positive, hence your first example does not work. But your second is still valid.

Mike Zupancic - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

3 - \sqrt(3) is positive.

Edit: finally got LaTeX to work in comment. Point was

( 3 3 ) (3 - \sqrt{3}) is a positive number.

Richard Desper - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

actually ,i have reshaped the problem a bit.my first example didn't work.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mohammad Khaza That would explain some of the confusion. My comment reflected what I saw: two numbers: (3-sqrt(3)) and sqrt(3). Both of these are positive numbers.

Richard Desper - 3 years, 8 months ago

3 \sqrt{3} is not positive.

Ron Lauterbach - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ron Lauterbach Bad interface and then the Internet froze on me, keeping me from correcting it. Obviously I don't think the sum of two negative numbers is positive.

Richard Desper - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Richard Desper 3 is a positive number? I know it is confusing " @Richard Desper - 3"

Ron Lauterbach - 3 years, 8 months ago
Me Myself
Sep 24, 2017

Suppose the statement is true. Then let q be rational and r be irrational, q>r. Then t=q-r must be rational, or else t+r=q will not be irrational, in contradiction with the statement. If t is rational, than r=t-q is rational, as the sum of the rational numbers t and -q is always rational (the fact that you can always choose a common denominator is a proof for it).That's another contradiction.

Therefore, the statement is false.

type 'then' instead of than.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 8 months ago
Alice Smith
Jan 18, 2018

l g ( 2 ) lg(2) + l g ( 5 ) lg(5) = l g ( 2 5 ) lg(2*5) = l g ( 10 ) lg(10) = 1 1

Am I making a unique counter example?

I think your the first one to think of logarithms.

Ron Lauterbach - 3 years, 4 months ago
Vu Vincent
Sep 27, 2017

Imagine having an irrational number with a decimal place like a = 0.123114958295... a=0.123114958295...

The thing to notice is how there always exist another irrational number b b that adds up a a such that it equals m . 99999999... \overline{m.99999999...} where m m is an integer in the range [ 0 ; 9 ] [0;9] and thus this evaluates to a + b = m + 1 a+b = m+1 , which is an integer and thus rational.

The number b b is basically, in any number in the decimal position in the irrational number a a , the corresponding decimal position's number in b b is exactly 9 minus that of in a a , and thus the two's adds up to 9. Doing this to all other decimal positions in a a and sum a a and b b will lend the result mentioned, m . 99999999... = m + 1 \overline{m.99999999...} = m+1 .

Therefore, irrational + irrational can be rational.

Vasanth Vasanth
Sep 30, 2017

let x be any positive irrational number (1-x) + x = 1

therefore, irrational num + irrational num not always equal to irrational number

Mary Trueman
Sep 30, 2017

I am so new to this but eager to learn Barney style. So when e+(3-e)= 3 you are just negating the e? Is that how I am to understand it? Sorry I'm so new!!!

Eric Dietrich
Sep 30, 2017

2 \sqrt{2} and 2 -\sqrt{2} are irrational, but 2 + ( 2 ) = 0 = 0 1 \sqrt{2}+(-\sqrt{2})=0=\frac{0}{1}

John McBride
Sep 28, 2017

Let A be an irrational number such that it is a non-repeating, non terminating decimal. Since there are only ten possible digitals for each place value of A, it is possible to find an irrational number B such that each digit of B is selected so that when the digits are added you get a fixed value e.g zero or three In this case the sum of A and B will give you a repeating decimal number which is rational!

Luca Galea
Sep 28, 2017

2 positives make a negative, easy

Ashok Wasan
Sep 26, 2017

22/7 + 20/7 =6

arrr irrational, NOT imaginary...

Virgil Waters - 3 years, 8 months ago
Moon Tiger
Sep 26, 2017

Take some irrational number x x , equal to something such as 3.1523796 3.1523796 and so on. We could make a new irrational number y y , such that for each digit after the decimal point of x x , the digit of y y at that point is equal to the difference between the digit of x x at that point and 9 9 . For the value of x x given earlier, y y would be 0.8476203... 0.8476203... and so on. Now x + y = c e i l ( x ) x + y =ceil(x) , meaning that we have added two irrational numbers to produce a rational number.

Some Guy
Sep 26, 2017

Basically, it depends on the number

It says must be irrational. If you can find one example, the statement is false.

Ron Lauterbach - 3 years, 8 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...