Given that a + a 2 + a 3 + ⋯ is a non-zero integer , can a 2 + a 3 + a 4 + ⋯ also be an integer?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The question is not really clear as it does not specify that series has to converge ? Some of integers is an integer.
Log in to reply
Even for the first series to converge 'a' has to lie in (-1,1) other wise how could it be a integer... !
What if I write the second series as a x(First series)? Is it correct? If so, it is possible
Log in to reply
Read Calvin's comment on the below solution..... It just makes hard to decide whether second series would be a integer or not!
Second series : A fraction a × ( An integer First series )
Now the problem is that multiplying a fraction by a integer does not always return a non integer ( Eg. 9*1/3 =3 (A integer)) and hence writing second series as integer times a fraction would be of no help.
Log in to reply
Right. We have to be careful about to present this
Thanks for answering! I agree with you. In fact, I thought the same way.. But the problem is stated as "can ... also be an integer?" And not "will ... also be an integer?" I'm not a native english speaker, but this misunderstood led me to the mistake
Log in to reply
@João Vitor Cordeiro de Brito – Can / Will matters if the statement is sometimes true.
"If
a
is an integer, can
a
/
2
be an integer?" Yes it can, for example when
a
=
2
.
"If
a
is an integer, will
a
/
2
be an integer?" No, not necessarily so.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Then, Y e s , the sequence can actually C a n also be an integer. Isn't it? Please, help me because I'm confused
Log in to reply
@João Vitor Cordeiro de Brito
–
If there is a value of
a
such that
a
+
a
2
+
.
.
.
is a non-zero integer AND
a
2
+
a
3
+
…
is an integer, then the answer to this question is YES.
If no such value exists, then the answer is NO.
The claim, proved in the solutions, is that no such value exists.
If ∣ a ∣ > 1 , The series won't converge.
a + a 2 + a 3 + … = 1 − a a .
a 2 + a 3 + a 4 + … = 1 − a a 2 . For it to be an integer, a also has to be an integer for ( − 1 , 1 ) but there is no non-zero integer in that interval.
I don't understand your reasoning. Why must a also be an integer? 2 5 × 2 is an integer even though 2 5 isn't an integer.
Log in to reply
Oh right. I've made the same mistake! hahahahaah
@Svatejas Shivakumar , do you know how to fix it?
Great.
Challenge master note : Find the error in the working below.
Suppose the first infinite geometric sum is equal to − 2 , then solving for a and substituting it into the second infinite sum of 1 − a a 2 , we get another integer − 4 . So the answer is be "Yes, it is possible".
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh Well obviously by solving, we get a = -2 and this is a contradiction!! Because the radius of convergence of the GP is when a lies between -1 and 1
The range of the infinite geometric sum should be (-1,1)
Log in to reply
Hmmm, nope. It is possible to have an infinite geometric sum outside of that range.
For example, (2/3) + (2/3)^2 + (2/3)^3 + ... = 2
Write x=a+a^2+a^3+... Then we have x=a*(1+x) and as x is non-zero, also (1+x) is non-zero by this equation. So we get a=x/(x+1) which is not integer. This is a alternative to the argument below using convergence. The Rest of the solution is as in the comments below
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Arithmetic and Geometric Progressions Problem Solving
For both series to converge ∣ a ∣ < 1 , also since first series is a non zero integer a = 0 . Hence a ∈ ( − 1 , 1 ) − { 0 } (i.e ′ a ′ is a non integer).
Write second series as:
( a + a 2 + a 3 + ⋯ ) − a
= (Some integer) − A non integer
And we know subtraction of a non integer from an integer cannot result in an integer. Hence second series can never be an integer.