x
n
+
1
=
ln
(
e
x
n
−
x
n
)
Let
x
0
,
x
1
,
x
2
,
…
be a series defined on the reals for
n
≥
0
, with
x
0
=
1
.
Find the value of
i
=
0
∑
∞
x
i
.
Give your answer to 3 decimal places.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The proof of convergence of the series is part of the proof of the result. A simple induction shows that x n > 0 for all n ≥ 0 , so the sequence of partial sums is monotonic increasing. Since n = 0 ∑ N x n = e x 0 − e x N + 1 < e x 0 = e for all N , it follows that the series converges.
if xn approaches 0 then wouldn't the answer be e-e^1? Bc if you plug in 0 then you would get e-e^1.
Log in to reply
I was proving convergence, so it was sufficient to show the partial sums were bounded above. Once convergence is established, we can let n go to ∞ , so that x n goes to 0 and the sum goes to e − 1 . Until we have proved convergence of the series, we do not know whether x n converges to 0 or not.
Proof of convergence of the series:
From the equation : e x n + 1 = e x n − x n
e x n − e x n + 1 = x n
By induction it can be shown that x n > 0 , So , e x n > e x n + 1 That implies x n > x n + 1
Using exponential series e x n = 1 + 1 x n + 2 ! x n 2 + ⋯
e x n > 1 + x n ⟹ e x n − x n > 1 ⟹ ln ( e x n − x n ) > 0 ⟹ x n + 1 > 0
So, the series is decreasing and it is bounded below So it is convergent sequence.and its limiting value is 0 and then @Upanshu Gupta 's solution.
@Mark Hennings is my logic correct ???
Log in to reply
You have shown that x n converges to some α ≥ 0 . Why should it converge to 0 ?
The real problem is not with x n converging to 0 . You need to show that ∑ n x n converges.
Log in to reply
Here zero is the infimum and limiting value will be equal to infimum
Log in to reply
@Kushal Bose – You have only shown that 0 is a lower bound, not that it is the infimum. However, the fact that the sequence of partial sums is bounded above, and hence converges, forces x n to converge to 0 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We'll begin by assuming( the proof is left to the reader)that the series is convergent.
Now, x n + 1 = ln ( e x n − x n ) Or, Equivalently: e x n + 1 = e x n − x n e x n + 1 = e x n − 1 − x n − 1 − x n e x n + 1 = e x n − 2 − x n − 2 − x n − 1 − x n Continuing like this, we see that: e x n + 1 = e x 0 − ( x 0 + x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + ⋯ + x n ) Or, e x n + 1 = e − i = 0 ∑ n x i Or, i = 0 ∑ n x i = e − e x n + 1 As, the series is convergent, it implies n → ∞ lim x n = 0 Hence, n → ∞ lim ⎝ ⎛ i = 0 ∑ n x i ⎠ ⎞ = e − e 0 Or, i = 0 ∑ ∞ x i = e − 1 ≈ 1 . 7 1 8 2 8 1 8 2 8 4 5 9 0 4 5