They Divide Nicely

Algebra Level 1

182 sweets are equally divided among a certain number of children at a party. If the number of sweets each child receives is one more than the number of children, find the number of children at the party.


The answer is 13.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Hung Woei Neoh
Apr 21, 2016

Let the number of children be x x . The number of candy each child gets is x + 1 x+1

Therefore, we have the equation:

182 x = x + 1 182 = x ( x + 1 ) x 2 + x 182 = 0 ( x + 14 ) ( x 13 ) = 0 x = 14 , 13 \dfrac{182}{x} = x+1\\ 182 = x(x+1)\\ x^2 + x - 182 = 0\\ (x + 14)(x - 13) = 0\\ x=-14, 13

Since we know that x > 0 x>0 , the number of children is x = 13 \boxed{x=13}

I use the same method

Jason Chrysoprase - 5 years, 1 month ago
Whitney Clark
May 5, 2016

They were integers, so I guessed-and-checked.

Abhay Tiwari
Apr 20, 2016

A simple multiplication will be enough to get the answer:

13 × 14 = 182 13×14=\boxed{182}

But that would mean that you're testing values one by one until you get it

Hung Woei Neoh - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Yes I was testing the values but not one by one.

The number of candies given to a child is one greater than the number of children.

So that means ( n ) × ( n + 1 ) = 182. (n)×(n+1)=182.

Now think of the two numbers with this result.

It is obvious that, they cannot be greater than 15 as 15×16=240.

And cannot be less than 10 as 10×11=121.

This can be applied for smaller numbers, but for larger numbers we will have to go through the conventional way only(like you did).

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

There is one more method, just factorise 182.

182 13 × 7 × 2 13 × 14 182 \Rightarrow 13 \times 7 \times 2 \Rightarrow 13 \times 14

There we get our answer!

Yash Jain - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Yash Jain Yes, this looks good. :)

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Abhay Tiwari Kinda similarly I checked integers, but to narrow the field, i took the sqrt(182) and got 13.5, so the first numbers I checked were 13 and 14 and it worked!

Connor Jennison - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Connor Jennison Ya, this is good too, gets you the idea for the values, good one :)

Abhay Tiwari - 5 years, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...