Select the most appropriate option :
If a < b < c < d and k is a real number independent of x , then ( x − a ) ( x − c ) + k ( x − b ) ( x − d ) has:
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Can you explain what you mean in "By using the discriminant (edited) we get
[
(
x
−
b
)
(
x
−
d
)
]
2
?
Are you considering this as a quadratic in
x
? If so,
x
should not appear in the discriminant.
Are you considering this as a quadratic in
k
? If so, we need a
k
2
term.
Can you explain what you mean in "By using the discriminant (edited) we get
[
(
x
−
b
)
(
x
−
d
)
]
2
? Are you considering this as a quadratic in
x
? If so,
x
should not appear in the discriminant.
Are you considering this as a quadratic in
k
? If so, we need a
k
2
term.
Log in to reply
i had the answer but i was not sure of a valid reason,cause i thought of it mentally....so can you please explain it better? and yeah i was considering it as a quadratic. And i meant by discriminent b^2-4ac,or is it called determinate? Well i am still a novice. Please help.
Log in to reply
Your solution (as it currently stands) is valid, because that is not the discriminant
We could solve this problem by considering the actual discriminant of the quadratic in x , but that is slightly painful to work through.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – so can you please show the shorter way,that would be nice.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
by using the discriminate we get {(x-b)(x-d)} ^2.
Through this we can say that all integral roots are real roots.b and d have to positive cause if b was less than d,that would contradict the question.They could be integral roots for what we know,but it has not said that and + non-integral root b can be less than + non-integral root d,so we use this to assume that they are real.