Quadratic equations always trouble you!

Algebra Level 3

Select the most appropriate option :

If a < b < c < d a<b<c<d and k k is a real number independent of x x , then ( x a ) ( x c ) + k ( x b ) ( x d ) (x-a)(x-c) + k(x-b)(x-d) has:

All real roots All integral roots Imaginary roots Without knowing the values of a , b , c , d a,b,c,d , nothing can be said

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Asad Jawaid
Nov 3, 2015

by using the discriminate we get {(x-b)(x-d)} ^2.

Through this we can say that all integral roots are real roots.b and d have to positive cause if b was less than d,that would contradict the question.They could be integral roots for what we know,but it has not said that and + non-integral root b can be less than + non-integral root d,so we use this to assume that they are real.

Moderator note:

Can you explain what you mean in "By using the discriminant (edited) we get [ ( x b ) ( x d ) ] 2 [(x-b)(x-d)]^2 ?
Are you considering this as a quadratic in x x ? If so, x x should not appear in the discriminant.
Are you considering this as a quadratic in k k ? If so, we need a k 2 k^2 term.

Can you explain what you mean in "By using the discriminant (edited) we get [ ( x b ) ( x d ) ] 2 [(x-b)(x-d)]^2 ? Are you considering this as a quadratic in x x ? If so, x x should not appear in the discriminant.
Are you considering this as a quadratic in k k ? If so, we need a k 2 k^2 term.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

i had the answer but i was not sure of a valid reason,cause i thought of it mentally....so can you please explain it better? and yeah i was considering it as a quadratic. And i meant by discriminent b^2-4ac,or is it called determinate? Well i am still a novice. Please help.

Asad Jawaid - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Your solution (as it currently stands) is valid, because that is not the discriminant

We could solve this problem by considering the actual discriminant of the quadratic in x x , but that is slightly painful to work through.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin so can you please show the shorter way,that would be nice.

Asad Jawaid - 5 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...