Radical Radicals

Algebra Level 3

How many positive x x satisfy

x + x + x + + x n square roots = 1 \Large \sqrt{x} + \sqrt{\sqrt{x}} + \sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{x}}} + \ldots + \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{x}}}}}_{n \text{ square roots}}=1

for a given positive integer n ? n?

Bonus: What sorts of bounds can you put on these solution(s) in terms of n ? n?

0 1 2 n 2^n n n

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Eli Ross Staff
Oct 12, 2015

Imagine a graph of y = x + x + x + + x n square roots . y=\sqrt{x} + \sqrt{\sqrt{x}} + \sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{x}}} + \ldots + \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{x}}}}}_{n \text{ square roots}}. It is clearly increasing in x x and it is continuous. When x = 0 , x=0, y = 0 , y=0, while for x = 1 , x=1, y = n . y=n. Thus, for exactly one x x between 0 and 1, the equation will be satisfied (imagine the graph intersecting the horizontal line y = 1 y=1 ).

Remark: While this idea is fairly intuitive, it is formalized in Calculus as the Intermediate Value Theorem .


So, can we start to bound what this solution for x x might be?

For x < 1 , x<1, the terms in the sum are increasing; e.g. x n square roots > > x > x > x . \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{x}}}}}_{n \text{ square roots}}> \cdots > \sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{x}}} > \sqrt{\sqrt{x}} > \sqrt{x}. Since there are n n terms, we must have n x < 1 , n\cdot \sqrt{x} < 1, so x < 1 n 2 . x < \frac{1}{n^2}. For example, if x + x + x = 1 , \sqrt{x} + \sqrt{\sqrt{x}} + \sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{x}}}=1, then 0 < x < 1 9 . 0<x<\frac{1}{9}.


Challenge: Can you find tighter bounds?

One possible method will involve the Applying the Arithmetic Mean Geometric Mean Inequality .

We can use the Arithmetic Mean Geometric Mean (AM-GM) Inequality on the numbers x , x , , x n square roots . \sqrt x, \sqrt {\sqrt x} ,\ldots , \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{x}}}}}_{n \text{ square roots}}. The arithmetic mean is 1 n \frac{1}{n} since there are n n terms that sum to 1. The geometric mean is ( x x x n square roots ) 1 n = ( k = 1 n x 1 2 k ) 1 n = ( x k = 1 n 1 2 k ) 1 n = ( x 1 1 2 n ) 1 n . \left(\sqrt x \cdot \sqrt {\sqrt x}\cdots \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{x}}}}}_{n \text{ square roots}}\right)^{\frac{1}{n}} = \left(\prod_{k=1}^{n} x^{\frac{1}{2^k}}\right)^{\frac{1}{n}} = \left(x^{\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{2^k}}\right)^{\frac{1}{n}} = \left(x^{1-\frac{1}{2^n}}\right)^{\frac{1}{n}}.

Since the n n numbers are unequal, by AM-GM inequality, the equality can't hold.

1 n n > x 1 1 2 n x < n n ( 1 + 1 2 n 1 ) \large \displaystyle \frac{1}{n^n} > x^{1 - \frac1{2^n}} \qquad \Rightarrow \qquad x < n^{-n\cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2^n-1}\right)}

which is tighter than n n n^{-n} and therefore much tighter than n 2 . n^{-2}. For n = 3 n= 3 , we get x < 3 3 ( 1 + 1 7 ) 0.0231 , x < 3^{-3\cdot \left(1+\frac{1}{7}\right)} \approx 0.0231, which is much better than 1 9 . 11. \frac{1}{9} \approx .11. As n n gets large, this bound becomes quite similar to n n . n^{-n}.

Pi Han Goh - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Wow! that's nice <3

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah -- it's a much better upper bound than n 2 . n^{-2}.

Can anyone find anything tighter? How about a lower bound tighter than 0?

Eli Ross Staff - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Eli Ross For the lower bound:

Let y = x n square roots y 2 = x n 1 square roots y = \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{x}}}}}_{n \text{ square roots}} \Rightarrow y^2=\underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{x}}}}}_{n-1 \text{ square roots}} .

Notice that x n 1 square roots > x n 2 square roots > > x \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{x}}}}}_{n-1 \text{ square roots}} > \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{x}}}}}_{n-2 \text{ square roots}} > \ldots > \sqrt x . So

1 = x + x + x + + x n square roots < y + ( n 1 ) y 2 1 = \sqrt{x} + \sqrt{\sqrt{x}} + \sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{x}}} + \ldots + \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{x}}}}}_{n \text{ square roots}} < y+ (n-1)y^2

This is a quadratic inequality, by the Quadratic Formula and using the fact that y > 0 , y>0, we have x 1 / 2 n = y > 1 + 4 n 3 2 n 2 x > ( 1 + 4 n 3 2 n 2 ) 2 n . x^{1/2^n} = y > \dfrac{-1 + \sqrt{4n-3}}{2n-2} \quad \Rightarrow\quad x > \left(\dfrac{-1 + \sqrt{4n-3}}{2n-2} \right)^{2^n}.

Combining these inequalities gives ( 1 + 4 n 3 2 n 2 ) 2 n < x < n n ( 1 + 1 2 n 1 ) \large \displaystyle \left(\dfrac{-1 + \sqrt{4n-3}}{2n-2} \right)^{2^n} < x < n^{-n\cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2^n-1}\right)}

Pi Han Goh - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Awesome! A few follow-up ideas:

1) The upper bound is similar to n n n^{-n} as n n grows large. How does that lower bound look as n n grows large?

2) Which of Pi Han's bounds do people think is "closer" to the actual values of x ? x?

3) Anyone have ideas for how we could tighten these further?

Eli Ross Staff - 5 years, 8 months ago
Pi Han Goh
Oct 13, 2015

Let y = x 1 / 2 n y = x^{1/2^n} , then we have an equation of y + y 2 + y 4 + + y 2 n 1 1 = 0 y + y^2 + y^4 + \ldots + y^{2^{n-1}} - 1 =0 . By Descartes' Rule of Signs , there's one positive real root of y y , thus there's only 1 \boxed1 positive real root of x x .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...