1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4
Without using a calculator, compare the numbers above. Which of the following options is true?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This is the best of all :)(+1)
Same solution :) , +1
Relevant wiki: Exponential Inequalities
1 1 = 1 , 2 = 2 2 1 = 4 4 1 , ( 2 2 1 ) 2 = 2 < ( 3 3 1 ) 2 = 3 3 2 → 2 2 1 < 3 3 1
that is, 3 3 1 > 2 2 1
Thus, 3 3 1 > 2 2 1 = 4 4 1 > 1 1
We get an accurate answer if we raise to the power of 12.
Log in to reply
Or power of 6
Wait, how do you even know that 2 < 3 3 2 ???
Log in to reply
Let's compare 2 2 1 and 3 3 1 .Making the denominators of the exponents equal,we get 2 6 3 and 3 6 2 .Clearly, 3 6 2 > 2 6 3 .As the finishing step,raise both sides by 3 6 to get 3 6 2 ⋅ 3 6 > 2 6 3 ⋅ 3 6 . ∴ 3 3 2 > 2
Log in to reply
Oh, thanks for explaning
Log in to reply
@Hung Woei Neoh – :-) if we provide details to each steps solution would get long and doesn't look cool. The reason for 2 < 3 3 2 is explained very clearly by Rohit.
Log in to reply
@Akash Patalwanshi – You should probably explain every step clearly,though not in detail,but a slight sketch will work.A role of a solution is to explain the steps in short yet fluent.Nevertheless,good job!
Log in to reply
@Rohit Udaiwal – Yes. I am beginner in Latex typing. For typing above solution, I had spend more than 15 minutes :-(. Thats the main reason otherwise I could provide the solution with full details.
Log in to reply
@Akash Patalwanshi – Oh no problem,I remember taking 30 minutes to write a solution for this problem.Lol :D
Log in to reply
@Rohit Udaiwal – I remember writing a solution which took me 45 minutes ti write.Deleted it though because it was brute force.
@Akash Patalwanshi – No worries. It takes time to learn and master L A T E X writing. I learn faster because I have taken programming courses. It's good that you try to learn and get used to it.
I have written extremely long solutions, like this , this , this and this . Actually, as a matter of fact, my solutions are usually very long. I prefer it that way though, it makes my solution clearer. These 4 are the extra long ones, which took me about an hour for each of them.
Log in to reply
@Hung Woei Neoh – Thanks. I will try to become perfect in latex typing soon. :-)
1 1 = 1 2 2 = 2 2 1 3 3 = 3 3 1 4 4 = ( 2 2 ) 4 1 = 2 2 1
From here, we know that 2 2 = 4 4
Now, we need to compare three numbers. We take the sixth power of these numbers:
1 6 = 1 ( 2 2 1 ) 6 = 2 3 = 8 ( 3 3 1 ) 6 = 3 2 = 9
We know that:
9 > 8 > 1 9 6 1 > 8 6 1 > 1 6 1 3 3 1 > 2 2 1 > 1 3 3 > 2 2 = 4 4 > 1 1
This problem is of type y = x x 1 . , which has its maximum value ay x=e. y ′ = x 2 x x 1 ∗ ( 1 − l n x ) From 0 < x < e , it is increasing. From e < x < i n f i n i t e it is decreasing. So 1 1 < 2 1 / 2 . 3 1 / 3 > 4 1 / 4 = 2 1 / 2 > 1 1
1 1 = 1 2 1 2 2 = 1 2 6 4 3 3 = 1 2 8 1 4 4 = 1 2 6 4 ( 1 2 8 1 = 3 3 ) > ( 1 2 6 4 = 2 2 ) = ( 1 2 6 4 = 4 4 ) > ( 1 2 1 = 1 1 )
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let □ represent the inequality/equality signs.Then: 1 1 □ 2 2 □ 3 3 □ 4 4 Since all the terms are positive,raising them all to the 1 2 th power preserves their ordering.Doing so yields: ( 1 1 ) 1 2 □ ( 2 2 ) 1 2 □ ( 3 3 ) 1 2 □ ( 4 4 ) 1 2 1 □ 6 4 □ 8 1 □ 6 4 Since 6 4 = 6 4 ,we get that 4 4 = 2 2 .Also,since 8 1 > 6 4 and 6 4 > 1 we know that 3 3 > 2 2 = 4 4 and that 2 2 = 4 4 > 1 .Combing these inequalities, we get: 3 3 > 4 4 = 2 2 > 1 1