Let P ( x ) = x 3 + x 2 + c a polynomial where c is a real number. Then there is a finite interval I such that, P ( x ) has more than one real root if and only if c is in I . If the length of I can be represented as a number of the form b a , where a and b are coprimes, then find a + b .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Amazingly detailed solution! (up-vote)
Log in to reply
Thank you, @Otto Bretscher , but I still think it is too long.
Use calculus to see that the function x 3 + x 2 has the local minimum f ( 0 ) = 0 and the local maximum f ( − 2 / 3 ) = 4 / 2 7 . Thus P ( x ) = x 3 + x 2 + c has more than one real root for − 2 7 4 ≤ c ≤ 0 , with a + b = 4 + 2 7 = 3 1
Nice problem! I will assign it in a calculus exam one of these days ;)
Thank you, Otto! This is the idea. In my solution, I tried to explain the details, to minimize the use of intuition and graphs.
Log in to reply
But of course, my solution could possibly be improved and simplified.
I certainly don't want to rely on intuition or graphs, but I do assume some general properties of cubics in my solution, particularly the limits at infinity and negative infinity. Using that, we can certainly say that there are three real solutions if f ( − 2 / 3 ) > 0 and f ( 0 ) < 0 , two distinct real solutions if either of those is an equality, and only one real solution otherwise. (We are using the intermediate value theorem throughout.) Is that too informal? ;)
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher , I consider your solution valid. I was just trying to justify why my solution has so many details. I did not mean to criticize your way of presenting the proof. You know, sometimes such extensive proof like mine can be a little bit boring.
Log in to reply
@Arturo Presa – I read that you are a Soviet trained mathematician... the best... my respect!
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – @Otto Bretscher , I have been following your problems and solutions here, and I respect you a lot too! I am also impressed by the level of graduate studies in this country where I have been living for 15 years. By the way, this website is the best. I always recommend my students to get in contact with Brilliant.
Consider g(x)=-(x^3+x^2) and plot its graph.Rest is easy to follow.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let us define f ( x ) = x 3 + x 2 . The zeros of its derivative f ′ ( x ) = 3 x 2 + 2 x are x = − 3 2 and x = 0 . One can also see that f ′ ′ ( − 3 2 ) = − 2 and f ′ ′ ( 0 ) = 2 , so f has a local maximum value of 2 7 4 at x = − 3 2 and a local minimum value of 0 at x = 0 .
In addition to that, the given problem can be reduced to find the interval of all values of c such that the equation f ( x ) = − c has two or three real solutions.
We are going to prove first that if the equation f ( x ) = − c has three or two different real solutions then − 2 7 4 ≤ c ≤ 0 .
Case 1 When the equation f ( x ) = − c has three different real solutions: x 1 , x 2 , x 3 where x 1 < x 2 < x 3 .
Using the Rolle'sTheorem , we obtain that the smaller zero of f ′ ( x ) , x = − 3 2 must be in between x 1 and the x 2 and the larger zero, x = 0 is in between x 2 and the x 3 , and it is easy to see the the local maximum value of f ( x ) is also the absolute maximum value of f ( x ) on the interval [ x 1 , x 2 ] and the local minimum value of f ( x ) is also the absolute minimum value on [ x 2 , x 3 ] . Therefore, 0 < − c < 2 7 4 .
Case 2 When the equation f ( x ) = − c has two different real solutions: x 1 , x 2 .
If the equation has only two different real solutions, then the third solution can't be complex, because the complex solutions appear in pairs of conjugate complex numbers (see Polynomial Roots ). Therefore one of the two real solutions is a root of multiplicity 2 of P ( x ) = f ( x ) + c . It is not difficult to see that a root of multiplicity higher than one of a polynomial P ( x ) is also a root of its derivative P ′ ( x ) = f ′ ( x ) . This implies that one of the two roots x 1 or x 2 is equal to either − 3 2 or 0 . Therefore, − c = 2 7 4 or − c = 0 .
From the conclusions of these two cases we get that when the given equation f ( x ) = − c has more than one solution then we obtain that 0 ≤ − c ≤ 2 7 4 that implies − 2 7 4 ≤ c ≤ 0 .
Now we have to prove the converse implication. That is, if − 2 7 4 ≤ c ≤ 0 then the equation f ( x ) = − c has more than one real solution.
If c = − 2 7 4 , then − c = 2 7 4 and one of the solutions of f ( x ) = − c is − 3 2 and we can prove that there is one more solution that is going to be in the interval ( 0 , 1 ) by using the Intermediate Value Theorem because f ( 0 ) + c = − 2 7 4 < 0 , and f ( 1 ) = 2 − 2 7 4 > 0 .
If c = 0 , then − c = 0 and then one of the solutions of f ( x ) = − c is 0 and we can see that there is one more solution that is indeed − 1 .
If − 2 7 4 < c < 0 , then f ( − 1 ) + c = c < 0 , f ( − 3 2 ) + c = 2 7 4 + c > 0 , f ( 0 ) + c = c < 0 , and f ( 1 ) + c = 2 + c > 0 . Therefore, using the Intermediate Value Theorem again we get that the equation has a solution in each of the following intervals: ( − 1 , − 3 2 ) , ( − 3 2 , 0 ) , and ( 0 , 1 ) . So the equation f ( x ) = − c has 3 different solutions.
Now we can conclude that to get the answer to the problem we have to find the length of the interval [ − 2 7 4 , 0 ] which is 2 7 4 where 4 and 2 7 are co-primes. Therefore the answer must be 4 + 2 7 = 3 1 .