Relative ages

A woman and her grandson have the same birthday. For 6 consecutive years, the age for the grandmother is a multiple of the age of the grandson. How old is the grandmother when her grandson was born?

Assume that the grandmother is less than 100 years old.


The answer is 60.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Calvin Lin Staff
Mar 12, 2015

Here's my solution which doesn't involve guesswork.

Let the grandmother be x x years old, and let the kid be k k years old when this first happens. Then, we are given that

x + k k , x + k + 1 k + 1 , x + k + 2 k + 2 , x + k + 3 k + 3 , x + k + 4 k + 4 , x + k + 5 k + 5 , \frac{ x+k} { k} , \frac{ x + k + 1 } { k + 1}, \frac{ x + k + 2} { k + 2}, \frac{ x + k + 3} { k + 3}, \frac{ x + k + 4 } { k + 4}, \frac{ x + k + 5} { k + 5},

are all integers. Subtracting 1 from each of them, we get that

x k , x k + 1 , x k + 2 , x k + 3 , x k + 4 , x k + 5 \frac{ x } { k } , \frac{ x } { k+1 } , \frac{ x } { k+2 } , \frac{ x } { k+3 } , \frac{ x } { k+4 } , \frac{ x } { k+5}

are all integers. Hence, (k, k+1, k+2, k+3, k+4, k+5 ) must all divide x x . This implies that the LCM of these 6 consecutive integers divide x x .

Let's try k = 1 k = 1 . Then L C M ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ) = 60 LCM ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) = 60 . We get that x = 60 x = 60 is a solution, and in fact so is x = 60 n x = 60 n . This is why I added in the restriction that x < 100 x < 100 .

Let's try k = 2 k = 2 . Then L C M ( 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ) = 420 LCM (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) = 420 , which would be too old. Similarly, for any larger k k , x x will be too large. Hence, the age is 60.

Why is the LCM the required age ?

Rishabh Tripathi - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Because the LCM divides x x , so we get that x = 60 n x = 60 n . With n = 1 n = 1 , we get x = 60 x = 60 . We then reject the larger values because that gives us > 100.

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh..kk I got it.. We have to find the smallest number as multiple of all the denominators and a factor of x x . Thank you... :)

Rishabh Tripathi - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Rishabh Tripathi Correct. let me add that in to make it clearer. Thanks!

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 3 months ago
Pi Han Goh
Mar 11, 2015

So what we are looking for is at least 5 5 consecutive composite numbers. Use this as a reference to simplify our calculation.

First six numbers that satisfy it are ( 23 , , 28 ) (23, \ldots , 28) . We check that 23 = 1 × 23 , 24 = ( 1 + 1 ) × 12 , 25 = 5 × 5 23 = 1 \times 23, 24 = (1+1) \times 12, 25 = 5 \times 5 , which is doesn't satisfy the condition.

Second six numbers are ( 24 , , 29 ) (24, \ldots , 29 ) , but factorization them also shows that they don't satisfy the condition for 25 = 5 × 5 25 = 5 \times 5 . And furthermore, it's extremely too young to be a grandmother at this age.

Next is ( 31 , , 36 ) (31, \ldots, 36 ) but 4 37 4 \mid 37 isn't true.

32 , 37 32, \ldots 37 but 4 37 4 \mid 37 isn't true.

Again:

( 47 , , 52 ) (47, \ldots ,52) : but 49 = 7 2 49 = 7^2

( 48 , , 53 ) (48, \ldots ,53) : 48 = 6 × 8 , 49 = ( 6 + 1 ) × 7 48 = 6 \times 8, 49 = (6+1) \times 7 but ( 6 + 2 ) 50 (6+2) \mid 50 is not true

( 61 , , 66 ) (61, \ldots ,66) Checks out with 61 = 1 × 61 , 62 = ( 1 + 1 ) × 31 , 63 = ( 1 + 2 ) × 21 , 61 = 1 \times 61, 62 = (1+1) \times 31, 63 = (1+2) \times 21,

64 = ( 1 + 3 ) × 16 , 65 = ( 1 + 4 ) × 13 , 66 = ( 1 + 5 ) × 11 64 = (1+3) \times 16, 65 = (1+4) \times 13, 66 = (1+5) \times 11

Hence, answer is 61 1 = 60 61 - 1 = \boxed{60}

We can even check that up to age 119 (which is pretty old if she's still alive), only one solution exist.

There's a much easier solution that doesn't use case checking.

Hint: Chinese remainder Theorem.

In fact, there are no other solutions for up to 100.

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 3 months ago

So, as I wrote out my solution, x = 120 x = 120 is a solution which contradicts your claim of "check up to age 139".

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

My arithmetic is bad, FIXED

Pi Han Goh - 6 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...