0 . 2 0 1 6 = 0 . 2 0 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 … = b a
Given that a and b are coprime positive integers, find a + b .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Very elegant. Very simple. Nicely done.
How do you know that 0.161616... is 16/99 ? What kind of math is that, and is there a good reference book on it?
Log in to reply
With this kind of repeating decimal, there is a simple pattern that can be followed to convert it to a fraction. Here are a few examples:
2/9 = 0.222222... 5/9 = 0.555555...
But here comes the interesting part:
34/99 = 0.343434... 238/999 = 0.238238... 2048/9999 = 0.20482048...
Essentially, the number in the numerator repeats to the right of the decimal point. Notice that the number of 9's has to be the same as the number of digits in the numerator, otherwise you'll get a leading zero in the repeating decimal:
24/999 = 0.024024...
But having the numerator greater than or equal to the denominator does not work:
24/9 does not equal 2.424242.
It's a geometric series: 0 . 1 6 1 6 1 6 … = ∑ i = 1 + ∞ 1 6 1 0 0 i 1 = 1 6 1 0 0 − 1 1
let b = 0.1616... ; then 100b = 16.1616... (100, because that draws one occurrence of the repeating pattern in front of the decimal) Subtract. All decimals cancel out: 99b = 16
Let x = 0 . 2 0 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 … .
Then 9 9 0 0 x = 1 0 0 0 0 x − 1 0 0 x = 2 0 1 6 . 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 … − 2 0 . 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 … = 2 0 1 6 − 2 0 .
This means that x = 9 9 0 0 2 0 1 6 − 2 0 = 2 4 7 5 4 9 9 = b a and hence a + b = 4 9 9 + 2 4 7 5 = 2 9 7 4 .
How did you make the observation that 9900x would produce a whole number? Just curious.
Log in to reply
see he or atleast me noticed that in order to recieve a whole no we need to cancel out the decimal repeating part of the number so its better to convert into two distinct forms in such a way that subtracting them yields a whole number so we did this.btw,it follows from a general form to convert any repeating into fractional form
Log in to reply
Thank you!
Log in to reply
@Skye Chen – u can follow me for more such comments and good questions
x = 0 . 2 0 1 6 = 0 . 2 0 1 6 1 6 1 6 … ⟹ { 1 0 4 x = 2 0 1 6 . 1 6 1 6 1 6 … = 2 0 1 6 . 1 6 ( 1 ) 1 0 2 x = 2 0 . 1 6 1 6 1 6 … = 2 0 . 1 6 ( 2 )
What do you get when you subtract equation ( 2 ) from equation ( 1 ) ?
The motivation to do this is usually noticing the repeating pattern and see how we can cancel out the repeating parts to get a linear equation in one variable (the variable representing the original number) that has a simple rational solution for x , which would be the rational representation of that number.
Log in to reply
Thanks, I actually think this is a better answer. Asdfgh Rfcv, your answer was good too but it didn't really explain. Thank you both for helping!
the periodic part are gone after the subtraction.
Same solution!
I still blur
I found 6 0 0 1 2 1 , that both seems to be co-primes. I was so disappointed that 6 0 0 1 2 1 not being the right answer that I throw away part of my calculations, but I have used these formulas of 'Generating all CoPrime Pairs' at wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprime_integers
Is it the (121, 600) pair also a possible one?
Log in to reply
Ops I got my error now, 0.2016161616..., not 0.2016666666... that gives my wrong answer. So, nevermind my former question. Nice solution above.
Log in to reply
I did the same mistake, was confused for a very long time.
I totally forgot about the coprime part :-D
It's easier to see if you start with 100x= 20.16161616...
You multiply with the power of 10, which shifts the decimal expansion by the length of the recurring portion. Because then subtracting the original number x=0.2016161616... you get rid of these repeating decimals and have 99x=19.96. Now it becomes obvious you need 9900x to get an integer number 1996 and 1996/9900 is the decimal expansion we started with, which can be reduced to 499/2475.
First we split the decimal into two parts, the repeating part and the non-repeating part.
0 . 2 0 1 6 = 0 . 2 + 0 . 0 0 1 6
We then turn both of them into fractions.
0 . 2 + 0 . 0 0 1 6 = 1 0 0 2 0 + 1 0 0 9 9 1 6 = 1 0 0 2 0 + 9 9 0 0 1 6
Then we simplify
1 0 0 2 0 + 9 9 0 0 1 6 = 9 9 0 0 9 9 ⋅ 2 0 + 1 6 = 9 9 0 0 1 9 9 6
9 9 0 0 1 9 9 6 = 4 9 5 0 9 9 8 = 2 4 7 5 4 9 9
Then we solve
2 4 7 5 4 9 9 = b a
a = 4 9 9 , b = 2 4 7 5
Therefore
a + b = 2 9 7 4
nothing in the given stated how many digits we had to take into consideration.
Log in to reply
It's a recurring decimal, you can take all of the digits into consideration, it's only when the decimal is either terminating (limited number of decimal places) or irrational (no pattern to an infinite number of decimal places) that you need to take into account the number of digits you need to be working with.
For recurring decimals they can be represented by sums, for instance 0 . 1 6 (otherwise known as 6 1 ) can be written as:
0 . 1 6 = 0 . 1 + 0 . 0 6 + 0 . 0 0 6 + 0 . 0 0 0 6 + ⋯
Ignoring the 0 . 1 it's easy to see the pattern the sum is taking and from that we can find the fraction that sum represents.
0 . 0 6 + 0 . 0 0 6 + 0 . 0 0 0 6 + ⋯ = 1 0 0 6 + 1 0 0 0 6 + 1 0 0 0 0 6 + ⋯
First we multiply by 1 0 , we'll call the original sum x for now
1 0 x = 1 0 6 + 1 0 0 6 + 1 0 0 0 6 + 1 0 0 0 0 6 + ⋯
We know the righthand side of the equation contains x due to the simple fact that x is an infinite sum.
1 0 x = 1 0 6 + x
From here we subtract x and divide by 9
9 x = 1 0 6
x = 9 0 6
From here we just simplify
x = 4 5 3
x = 1 5 1
This isn't 6 1 of course but that's only because we haven't added the 0 . 1 back in from when we took it out earlier
0 . 1 6 = 0 . 1 + 1 5 1
0 . 1 6 = 1 0 1 + 1 5 1
0 . 1 6 = 1 5 0 1 5 + 1 5 0 1 0
0 . 1 6 = 1 5 0 2 5
Finally we simplify
0 . 1 6 = 3 0 5
0 . 1 6 = 6 1
And there we have it.
If you get stuck on questions like these in the future try and remember this method as it works for every recurring decimal you might come across.
If you need anything else explaining just respond below this comment and I'll try to respond back, I'm not as active on here as I used to be so it might be a while before you get another response.
Hope I helped!
Well, yes. The bar notation does. Infinite repetition.
224/1111 224+1111=1335
0.20161616...
= 0.2 + 0.01616...
= 1/5 + 16/9900
= 1980/9900 + 16/9900
= 1996/9900
= 499/2475
Now we have:
499 + 2475
= 2974
These are really too easy for someone who has done a maths undergradute, not to mention people with doctoarte in mathematics (statistics).
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I consider that 0.20161616... is made up from 0.04 plus 0.16161616...
0.04 is 1/25
0.161616... is 16/99
Sum both numbers up and I got 499/2475.
Then sum both nominator and denominator, I got 2974.
Slightly different approach but I think this solution is much similar with Lee's.