RLC Bridge Circuit

A DC voltage source excites an RLC network as shown below. At time t = 0 t = 0 , the inductors and capacitors are de-energized.

I R ( t ) I_R (t) is the current flowing through the resistor from left to right . Let I R 0 I_{R0} be the resistor current at time t = 0 t = 0 , and let I R I_{R \infty} be the limiting value of the resistor current as the elapsed time approaches infinity. Let I R m i n I_{Rmin} be the smallest resistor current value between t = 0 t = 0 and t = t = \infty .

Determine the following quantity:

Q = I R m i n I R 0 I R \large{Q = I_{Rmin} \, I_{R0} \, I_{R \infty} }

Details and Assumptions:
1) V S = 10 V_S = 10
2) L 1 = L 2 = 1 L_1 = L_2 = 1
3) C 1 = C 2 = 5 C_1 = C_2 = 5
4) R = 1 R = 1
5) The bigger the absolute value of a negative number, the smaller the number


The answer is 1468.9.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Karan Chatrath
Apr 19, 2020

I have done this problem analytically. First, I shall introduce some notation that I have used.

  • Current through inductor L1 - I 2 I_2
  • Current through capacitor C1 - I 1 I_1
  • Charge on capacitor C1 - Q 1 Q_1
  • Current through resistor (left to right) - I o I_o
  • Source current - I I
  • Current through inductor L2 - I 4 I_4
  • Current through capacitor C2 - I 3 I_3
  • Charge on capacitor C2 - Q 3 Q_3

Now, forming equations of the circuit as per Kirchoff's laws gives:

Q ˙ 1 = I 1 \dot{Q}_1 = I_1 Q ˙ 3 = I 3 \dot{Q}_3 = I_3 I = I 1 + I 2 I = I_1 + I_2 I 3 = I o + I 2 I_3 = I_o + I_2 I 1 = I o + I 4 I_1 = I_o + I_4 I ˙ 2 = Q 1 5 + I o \dot{I}_2 = \frac{Q_1}{5} + I_o I ˙ 4 = Q 3 5 + I o \dot{I}_4 = \frac{Q_3}{5} + I_o Q 1 5 + I ˙ 4 = 10 \frac{Q_1}{5} + \dot{I}_4 = 10

Taking Laplace transform on both sides of each equation gives:

s Q 1 ( s ) = I 1 ( s ) sQ_1(s) = I_1(s) s Q 3 ( s ) = I 3 ( s ) sQ_3(s) = I_3(s) I ( s ) = I 1 ( s ) + I 2 ( s ) I(s) = I_1(s) + I_2(s) I 3 ( s ) = I o ( s ) + I 2 ( s ) I_3(s) = I_o(s) + I_2(s) I 1 ( s ) = I o ( s ) + I 4 ( s ) I_1(s) = I_o(s) + I_4(s) s I 2 ( s ) = Q 1 ( s ) 5 + I o ( s ) sI_2(s) = \frac{Q_1(s)}{5} + I_o(s) s I 4 ( s ) = Q 3 ( s ) 5 + I o ( s ) sI_4(s)= \frac{Q_3(s)}{5} + I_o(s) Q 1 ( s ) 5 + s I 4 ( s ) = 10 s \frac{Q_1(s)}{5} + sI_4(s) = \frac{10}{s}

Solving for I o ( s ) I_o(s) gives the following. The simplification is tedious and this exercise will show why the author of the problem and I both prefer a numerical approach.

I o ( s ) = 10 ( 5 s 2 1 ) s ( 5 s 2 + 2 s + 1 ) I_o(s) = \frac{10\,\left(5\,s^2-1\right)}{s\,\left(5\,s^2+2\,s+1\right)}

The resistor current can be computed now by taking the above equation's inverse Laplace transform. This has been done using an online tool, the result of which was simplified further. The result is:

I o ( t ) = I R = 20 cos ( 2 t 5 ) e t 5 10 I_o(t) = \boxed{I_R = 20\,\cos\left(\frac{2\,t}{5}\right)\,{\mathrm{e}}^{-\frac{t}{5}}-10}

This method, in principle, can be applied to all circuit problems. But be warned that it requires patience and the inverse Laplace transform will not be an easy computation especially when the numerator and denominator polynomials cannot be easily factored.

How robust are those inverse Laplace transform calculator programs? Do they choke for higher-order circuits? Then again, it might not even be possible to form the Laplace function for those circuits anyway. It's impressive that you were able to do it here.

Steven Chase - 1 year, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Thank you. I used Wolfram for the inverse Laplace transform. The site has an online calculator. I have not tested that tool for higher-order circuits just yet. I could apply this for one of your earlier problems but given that solving for the resistor current in the s-domain was a sizeable amount of work, I also speculate that it would be more tedious for higher-order circuits.

As for this problem, I wanted to try out a method different from the usual brute-force numerical integration technique. It worked out well in this case.

Karan Chatrath - 1 year, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath Sir I have also written Kirchhoff equation correctly but after that in laplace you have added ( s ) (s) what does it mean.? Did after that you have solved all 8 equation analytically? Elaborate please

A Former Brilliant Member - 1 year, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member You can read about Laplace transforms by searching the internet and see how they are applied to solve linear differential equations. The meaning of s s , etc. will become evident.

Karan Chatrath - 1 year, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath @Karan Chatrath No extra information is required for that question. @Steven Chase sir has posted his solution also.

A Former Brilliant Member - 1 year, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member Okay, I figured it out. Even I get an answer of around 1.58. The wording of the problem did not help me understand it very well, to be honest. You said 'the equation of motion has the form...'.

Firstly, the correct word to use there is not 'equation of motion', in my opinion. It is 'trajectory' or 'path'. Secondly, when you say that the equation is 'of the form..', you are suggesting that the path has a similar form as that but it is not exactly that. I found it misleading.

The correct phrase to use would be:

'Under the influence of the external electric field, the particle moves along the trajectory y = 3 x 4 x 2 y = 3x-4x^2 ...'. I suggest rephrasing the problem.

A very big reason I am able to correctly solve many problems by @Steven Chase is that they are very clearly stated with no room for confusion. I think this is an important quality for all of us to work on while posting problems.

Karan Chatrath - 1 year, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath @Karan Chatrath Yes I agree with you. From next time I will try as far as possible to leave no room for confusion.

A Former Brilliant Member - 1 year, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...