A polynomial f ( x ) of degree n with real coefficients has roots x 1 , x 2 , … , x n = 1 is such that f ( 1 ) = − 1 0 , f ′ ( 1 ) = 1 and f ′ ′ ( 1 ) = 6 .
Find i = 1 ∑ n ( 1 − x i ) 2 1 .
Clarification : f ′ ( x ) and f ′ ′ ( x ) represents the first and second derivative of f ( x ) , respectively.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice solution and thank you for the inspiration... However, you don't need Vieta, Newton, substitution...Do you know how I solved it? If you suppose that there is one only polynomial fulfilling these constraints, then the polynomial must be a second degree polynomial. I mean f ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c ⇒ f ( 1 ) = − 1 0 = a + b + c , f ′ ( 1 ) = 1 = 2 a + b , f ′ ′ ( 1 ) = 6 = 2 a ⇒ f ( x ) = 3 x 2 − 5 x − 8 . . . Now, you only have to solve the equation 3 x 2 − 5 x − 8 = 0 Thus, x 1 = 3 8 , x 2 = − 1 The rest is simple... With his, I have solved the question and furthemore I have got the roots, even the polynomial... What do you think about my process?is it difficult? am I wrong?...
Log in to reply
this is excellent ! you found the scratch and the info I proived was for this polynomial only. I mad the problem from this polynomial and gave it as a nth degree polynomial so to confuse. But to make sure its a second-degree polynomial we dont have sufficient logic for that.
Log in to reply
thank you very much!... as I said I assumed that the polynomial should be unique (this doesn't mean it's right), and because of the restrictions(constraints) that you gave the only possibility is that it was a second-degree polynomial.. By the way, I'm going to continue working about this wiki . I tell you because I couldn't mention you when I was going to write Bernouilli equation. Now , I'm going to continue with variable changes for the independient variable x including Euler's equation, and later I'll make variable changes involving the two variables x ∧ y . You can and you are invited to contribute, if you want... Greetings...
Log in to reply
@Guillermo Templado – I must say the wiki is going great till and I would contribute to the best of my knowledge :)
Let f ( x ) = ( x − x 1 ) ( x − x 2 ) ⋯ ( x − x n )
Differentiating w.r.t. x
f ′ ( x ) = ( x − x 2 ) ( x − x 3 ) ⋯ ( x − x n ) + ( x − x 1 ) ( x − x 3 ) ⋯ ( x − x n ) + ( x − x 1 ) ( x − x 2 ) ⋯ ( x − x n − 1 )
f ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) ∑ i = 0 n x − x i 1
Putting x = 1 we get: ∑ i = 0 n x − x i 1 = f ( 1 ) f ′ ( 1 ) = − 1 / 1 0
Now again differentiate w.r.t. x :
f ′ ′ ( x ) = ∑ i = 0 n ( x − x i ) 2 f ′ ( x ) ( x − x i ) − f ( x )
f ′ ′ ( x ) = f ′ ( x ) ∑ i = 0 n x − x i 1 − f ( x ) ∑ i = 0 n ( x − x i ) 2 ) 1
∑ i = 0 n ( x − x i ) 2 1 = f ( x ) f ′ ( x ) ∑ i = 0 n x − x i 1 − f ′ ′ ( x )
Putting x=1 in this equation:
∑ i = 0 n ( 1 − x i ) 2 1 = f ′ ( 1 ) ( − 1 / 1 0 ) − f ′ ′ ( 1 ) ) / f ( 1 ) = 0 . 6 1
Given x 1 , x 2 , ⋯ x n are roots.
So, f ( x ) = k 1 ∏ n ( x − x i )
Differentiating once, f ′ ( x ) = 1 ∑ n x − x i f ( x ) = f ( x ) 1 ∑ n x − x i 1
So, 1 ∑ n x − x i 1 = f ( x ) f ′ ( x )
Differentiating again, f ′ ′ ( x ) = 1 ∑ n [ x − x i f ′ ( x ) − ( x − x i ) 2 f ( x ) ] = f ′ ( x ) ⋅ f ( x ) f ′ ( x ) − f ( x ) 1 ∑ n ( x − x i ) 2 1 ⇒ 1 ∑ n ( x − x i ) 2 1 = ( f ( x ) ) 2 ( f ′ ( x ) ) 2 − f ′ ′ ( x ) f ( x ) = 0 . 6 1
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
If f ( x ) = a 0 x n + a 1 x n − 1 + ⋯ + a n has roots x 1 , x 2 , ⋯ , x n then the substitution y = 1 − x 1 transforms f ( x ) into a polynomial with roots 1 − x 1 1 , ⋯ , 1 − x n 1 and thus,
f ( x ) = x n k = 0 ∑ n a k − x n − 1 k = 1 ∑ n ( 1 k ) a k + ⋯ + 1 = 0 and by Vieta's we have
i = 1 ∑ n 1 − x i 1 = ∑ k = 0 n a k ∑ k = 1 n a k ( 1 k ) = f ( 1 ) f ′ ( 1 )
Again by Newton's identities we have p 0 S 2 + p 1 S 1 + 2 p 2 = 0 where p i are the coefficients of the transformed equation and S m are the sum of m-th power of roots, Simplifying we get i = 1 ∑ n ( 1 − x i ) 2 1 = ( f ( 1 ) ) 2 ( f ′ ( 1 ) ) 2 − f ( 1 ) f ′ ′ ( 1 ) = 1 0 0 6 1 = 0 . 6 1
Note : Every coefficient p n of the transformed equation can be related to f ( x ) by p n = n ( − 1 ) n f ( n ) ( 1 ) which we can observe easily.