P ( k ) is the number of petals in a rose formed by the polar equation r = cos ( k θ ) .
For example, P ( 4 ) = 8 because r = cos ( 4 θ ) has 8 petals, and P ( 5 ) = 5 because r = cos ( 5 θ ) has 5 petals.
Is there a positive integer k such that P ( k ) = 2 0 1 8 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great solution!
Every year when I teach precalculus my students love making roses when we learn about polar coordinates. We then figure out what numbers of petals are possible. Your explanation is a bit excessive for them but they get that the petals for odd k overlap so they don't appear doubled. The following class I always challenge them to make a 6 petaled rose. It's impossible by the rules of this problem but can be accomplished by bending the rules in different ways and a great challenge for the students.
Log in to reply
My pre-calculus students also love making roses. Asking them to make a 6 petaled rose is a great idea! I'm going to start asking that, too.
I got the explanation but I feel r shouldnt be negative (polar coordinates) , implying there should be no graph for those angles. This makes P(k) = k for all k. This seems more intuitive for me.
Log in to reply
I'm not sure what you mean, but in polar coordinates r can definitely be negative. In a simple example, if r = cos θ , r will become negative as soon as θ goes past 2 π . Actually I just reread your comment and saw the "... there should be no graph for those angles." It's an interesting idea, but then the domains of functions would be missing any number of intervals of angles which would be inadmissible, and that would be rather messy.
Log in to reply
Gobind is correct. By DEFINITION of polar coordinates, r cannot be negative!
Log in to reply
@Richard Greene – It depends whose definition you use. You can restrict r > 0 and 0 ≤ θ < 2 π but the picture of r = cos 4 θ indicates we should not do so for this problem.
Basically from a physics viewpoint , r is the distance from the origin and technically distances cant be negative. That's why I struggled with this question thinking it was wrong.
Log in to reply
@Gobind Singh – After you and Richard Greene both echoed the same sentiment, I did a little research (I've only had very limited exposure to polar coordinates myself.) From what I read, it appears that from a strictly mathematical standpoint it is acceptable to have negative values for r, unless one wants every point to have a unique representation, then one restricts r to non-negative values and theta to one revolution. But I understand what you're saying too, from a physical standpoint negative distances of course make no sense.
I agree. Was confused at first because it was like that, and my graphing calculator also showed only for positive numbers. Question should at least have a note saying that r is |r|
Log in to reply
What graphing calculator are you using that only shows positive r?
I cheated on this one - I happen to know that petals on flowers nearly always exist in either Fibonacci numbers or numbers that are double a Fibonacci number, and it takes very little time indeed to work out that 2018 is neither of the foregoing.
Log in to reply
But P(6) = 12 and 12 is neither a Fibonacci number nor double a Fibonacci number.
The "rose" in the problem is mathematical, not botanical. The name is the same because of similar visual characteristics, nothing more. Your "cheating" was no better than a guess. We've all tested our luck on true/false exam questions, so why not here also?
If r = cos c θ , for some positive integer c , then the number of petals will be 2 c if c is even, or the number of petals will be c if c is odd. Therefore, the number of petals must be odd or a multiple of 4 , but 2 0 1 8 is neither.
Prime factorization of 2018 is 2 and 1009. It (2018=2×1009) will not match any odd or even (multiple of 4) petals counts in a polar plot r=cos(k*theta), for any value of k (odd or even).
Therefore, answer is 'NO'.
i have no IDEA what you guys are talking about, but this answer seems the most logical . thank you Mr. Vinod Kumar! i appreciate it
Since if k is odd,then P ( k ) = k .If k is even,then P ( k ) is divisible by 4.Since 2018 isn't odd or divisible by 4,so the answer is N o
roses are red, violets are blue, 1009 is odd so saying there is an integer k such that P(k)=2018 won't be true.
We have to use facts.....such that no of petals in a flower appears to be in Fibonacci sequence....and we just have to prove that 2018 is not a Fibonacci number
P(5) = 5 which is a number in the Fibonacci sequence, but P(2) = 4 which is not a number in the Fibonacci sequence. The solution has nothing to do with 2018 being a Fibonacci number or not.
2018 is not a multiple of 4 or odd.
P (odd) = odd , P (even) = 2 × even
Why?
We will count the number of petals by counting how many times r = 1 or r = − 1 (so we will count the endpoints of petals)
At first notice that the period of c o s ( k θ ) is equal to k 2 π .
So if we segmented [ 0 , 2 π ) into pieces [ 0 + n k 2 π , k 2 π + n k 2 π ) we would get in each of k pieces 1 solution ( θ = 0 + n k 2 π ) for c o s ( k θ ) = 1 and 1 solution ( θ = k π + n k 2 π ) for c o s ( k θ ) = − 1 .
The only issue when θ = k π + n k 2 π , r = − 1 is that we might count it twice (if θ = k π + n k 2 π + π ⇒ r = 1 ).
This happens when k is odd and doesn't when k is even.
Since 2018 is not divisible by 4 nor odd there is no such k that P ( k ) = 2 0 1 8
r=cos(k∆),if k is an even integer then 2k should be the number of petals p(k),if k is an odd integer then k should be the p(k).But the number of petals in the flowers depends on fibonicci series:0,1,1,2,3,5.....So here p(k)=2018,but 2018 is not a fibonicci number,so the answer is "no"
The answer cannot be 2018 because 2018 is neither odd nor a multiple of 4, not because it's not a Fibonacci number. (P(2) = 4 and 4 is not a Fibonacci number.)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The curve r = cos ( k θ ) begins ( θ = 0 ) at r = 1 on the polar axis, or equivalently the point ( 1 , 0 ) on the x -axis. It reaches the pole (the origin) for the first time when k θ = 2 π , i.e. when θ = 2 k π . By then it has completed half of a petal, which means that θ has to rotate through k π to complete one full petal.
In order to complete a rose, the curve must return to its starting point, which will happen in one of two ways: either θ is a multiple of 2 π and r = 1 , the latter implying that k θ is also a multiple of 2 π ; or θ is an odd multiple of π and r = − 1 , the latter again implying that k θ is also an odd multiple of π .
Suppose k is odd. The first time one of the two above conditions is satisfied is when θ = π ; by then, since one petal is completed for every k π , the rose will have k petals. But this means the number of petals will be odd.
Suppose k is even. Then when θ is any multiple of π (even an odd multiple) k θ will be an even multiple of π , so the first time the necessary conditions for completion of a rose are satisfied will be when θ = 2 π ; by then, the rose will have 2 k petals. But this means the number of petals will be a multiple of 4 .
Since 2 0 1 8 is neither odd nor a multiple of 4 , there can be no integer k such that P ( k ) = 2 0 1 8 .