Set with an Interesting Property...

The set { 1 , 3 , 8 , 120 } \{1,3,8,120\} has the interesting property that if you take any two numbers in that set and multiply them together, you will get precisely one less than a square number.

And one more number to this set such that it retains its property. (Your answer will be the number you add to the set.)

Bonus: Is than more than one number that you can add to this set such that it retains its property?


The answer is 0.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

No such fifth positive integer is possible

Mr. Mendrin, I presume. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

only from the Y!A days... I'm starting to miss them

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah, I know what you mean.

Brian Charlesworth - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Brian Charlesworth @Brian Charlesworth , sir , does Mr.Mendrin have any other 'active account'? These have been deleted and his problems are also nice

Mr. India - 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mr. India Yes, you can enter Michael Mendrin into the search field to gain access to his problems, or go here to see his profile page.

Brian Charlesworth - 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Brian Charlesworth Ok thank you, has he stopped using brilliant?

Mr. India - 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mr. India He is not as active as he used to be, but I don't think he has completely stopped.

Brian Charlesworth - 2 years, 3 months ago

Proof? \quad

Pi Han Goh - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Ask Mendrin for the proof. He knows everything. He'll probably say, "go look up this one" D(-1) Quadruple Conjecture or something like that

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Mendrin? Never heard of him. I know someone who is omniscience though, he goes by the name Scythian1950.

Pi Han Goh - 2 years, 7 months ago

You could ask Mendrin, of course. But Baker and Davenport proved this back in 1969; their paper is behind a paywall, but this paper goes further and provides a generalization of their result.

@Michael Scythian Hahaha I posted my comment at the same time you were adding the reference to yours. At least they are different papers, so Pi Han Goh has a choice. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Let me go check out Baker & Davenport.

Problem of Diophantus

says that the Diophantine pair {1, 3} cannot be extended to a Diophantine qunituple, so I think this paper is definitive on this matter, whether or not there's a 5th term {1, 3, 8, 120, ?}. Ask Mendrin for details on this.

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 7 months ago
Joshua Lowrance
Nov 9, 2018

If you multiply any number in that set by 0 0 , it will be 0 0 , which is one less than 1 2 1^{2} .

As Michael points out, (and I'm guessing you already know, otherwise there wouldn't have been a unique solution), there is no fifth positive integer, as noted here .

Brian Charlesworth - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

I was not aware there was no fifth positive integer, I was just aware that if there was one, it was incredibly big, or it hasn't been discovered yet. Thank you for letting me know.

Joshua Lowrance - 2 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...