Single bond vs. Multiple bond

Chemistry Level 3

It is known that many of the period 2 non-metal elements can form many double bonds and even triple bonds with other elements. However, as we go down the periodic table, we start to see that the elements are less able to make multiple bonds and usually only single bonds.

Why is that so?

Pick the best reason.

There is too much inter-nuclei repulsion Large atoms have more unstable nuclei Pi bonds are distance-sensitive There is too much inter-electronic repulsion

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Tan Yong Boon
Dec 22, 2016

The formation of multiple bonds involves the formation of pi bond, which is the side-on overlap of orbitals. Compared to the head-on overlap of orbitals, like in sigma bonds, the pi bond is much more distance-sensitive as it is a side-on overlap, as shown in the image below. As atomic radius increases, the pi bonds are much weaker as the overlap of the orbitals become less effective. Thus, for those heavier elements, the formation of multiple bonds is not favourable.

@Tan Yong Boon .. (D) should also be a correct answer because of large atomic radii , Pi bonds can't overlap effectively.

A C - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Hmmm... I was thinking about that too. Perhaps I should edit the options. Thank you for pointing out.

Tan Yong Boon - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Those who answered "Atomic radii become too large" have been marked correct.

I have changed that option to "Large atoms have more unstable nuclei".

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Thank you sir. .. @Calvin Lin

A C - 4 years, 5 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...