A bead slides from rest down a wire that's bent into a helix, which can be parametrized in the following way: ⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ x = cos ( θ ) y = sin ( θ ) z = θ . Find the magnitude of the bead's vertical acceleration.
Assumptions:
The bead slides without friction and there is a uniform, gravitational field
−
g
z
^
.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The problem becomes a lot easier when you straighten out the wire: the bead simply slides down a 4 5 ∘ gradient. The centripetal force component (in the ( x , y ) plane) does not affect the acceleration along the path at all.
Log in to reply
Yes, indeed. It's basically a ramp problem in disguise. Although I'm starting to develop a taste for scalar-based physics (Lagrange / energy) as opposed to vector-based physics (Newton / force). With the former, the behavior simply comes out of the math, without requiring a bunch of reasoning about how things "should" behave.
Log in to reply
The energy approach (or Lagrange or Hamilton) is very nice if the system is conservative-- but that does not always work!
Log in to reply
@Arjen Vreugdenhil – That's right. That's the Achilles heel.
Analysis with forces: the net force is a combination of the centripetal force F c p and a force along the wire F p a r . It is the result of a normal force F n perpendicular to the wire and the gravitational force F g . We have
F c p = F n , i n ; F p a r = F g sin 4 5 ∘ ; 0 = F n , u p − F g cos 4 5 ∘ .
The acceleration along the wire (i.e. rate of increase of speed) is a p a r = m F g sin 4 5 ∘ = 2 g . The vertical component of this acceleration is a z = a p a r sin 4 5 ∘ = 2 g ⋅ 2 1 = 2 g . The centripetal acceleration points toward the axis of the spiral and does not contribute to the vertical component.
2 π of this helix.
A helix is nothing but an inclined plane that is wound around a vertical axis! So Let's unwide a turn or a complete rotationSince the radius is 1 unit, the horizontal distance covered = 2 π this will result in vertical rise of 2 π . Hence the angle of this inclined plane must be 45°
Since the acceleration of a body sliding down an inclined plane in absence of friction is g sin θ its vertical component will be g sin θ × cos θ
Substituting θ = 4 5 ° we get vertical acceleration = g sin 4 5 ° × cos 4 5 ° = 2 g
Exceptional! Lovely way of looking at the problem. Kudos!
um, the vertical component would be g sin θ × sin θ according to where θ is on the picture, it's just that in this case sin = cos.
I will use Newton's second law projected along the constraint (the wire). The position of the particle is:
r = ( cos θ , sin θ , θ )
its velocity is
r ˙ = ( − sin θ , cos θ , 1 ) θ ˙
where the dot denotes derivation with respect to the time, and its acceleration is
r ¨ = ( − cos θ , − sin θ , 0 ) θ ˙ 2 + ( − sin θ , cos θ , 1 ) θ ¨
The vertical acceleration is θ ¨ and the force field is F = − m g z ^ . The direction of the constraint (the wire) is given by the versor
r ˙ ^ = 2 1 ( − sin θ , cos θ , 1 )
and the projected Newton's second law reads:
F ⋅ r ˙ ^ = m r ¨ ⋅ r ˙ ^
Substituting the components determined earlier, we get:
− 2 m g = 2 m [ − sin θ ( − cos θ θ ˙ 2 − sin θ θ ¨ ) + cos θ ( − sin θ θ ˙ 2 + cos θ θ ¨ ) + θ ¨ ]
and finally
θ ¨ = − 2 g
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Write the ( x , y , z ) velocities:
x ˙ = − sin ( θ ) θ ˙ y ˙ = cos ( θ ) θ ˙ z ˙ = θ ˙
Square of the velocity magnitude:
v 2 = x ˙ 2 + y ˙ 2 + z ˙ 2 = 2 θ ˙ 2
Set the kinetic energy equal to the change in potential energy (assuming the bead starts at a particular height / angle):
m g ( θ 0 − θ ) = 2 1 m 2 θ ˙ 2 g ( θ 0 − θ ) = θ ˙ 2
Time-differentiate both sides:
− g θ ˙ = 2 θ ˙ θ ¨ − g = 2 θ ¨ θ ¨ = − 2 g