Sliding Down a Helix

A bead slides from rest down a wire that's bent into a helix, which can be parametrized in the following way: { x = cos ( θ ) y = sin ( θ ) z = θ . \begin{cases} x = \cos(\theta) \\ y = \sin(\theta) \\ z = \theta. \end{cases} Find the magnitude of the bead's vertical acceleration.


Assumptions: The bead slides without friction and there is a uniform, gravitational field g z ^ . -g\,\hat{\mathbf{z}}.

g 4 \frac{g}{4} g 2 \frac{g}{2} g 3 \frac{g}{\sqrt{3}} g 2 \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}}

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Steven Chase
Aug 5, 2017

Write the ( x , y , z ) (x,y,z) velocities:

x ˙ = sin ( θ ) θ ˙ y ˙ = cos ( θ ) θ ˙ z ˙ = θ ˙ \dot{x} = -\sin(\theta) \, \dot{\theta} \\ \dot{y} = \cos(\theta) \, \dot{\theta} \\ \dot{z} = \dot{\theta}

Square of the velocity magnitude:

v 2 = x ˙ 2 + y ˙ 2 + z ˙ 2 = 2 θ ˙ 2 v^2 = \dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2 = 2 \dot{\theta}^2

Set the kinetic energy equal to the change in potential energy (assuming the bead starts at a particular height / angle):

m g ( θ 0 θ ) = 1 2 m 2 θ ˙ 2 g ( θ 0 θ ) = θ ˙ 2 mg (\theta_0 - \theta) =\frac{1}{2} m 2 \dot{\theta}^2 \\ g (\theta_0 - \theta) = \dot{\theta}^2

Time-differentiate both sides:

g θ ˙ = 2 θ ˙ θ ¨ g = 2 θ ¨ θ ¨ = g 2 -g \dot{\theta} = 2 \dot{\theta} \ddot{\theta} \\ -g = 2 \ddot{\theta} \\ \boxed{\ddot{\theta} = -\frac{g}{2}}

The problem becomes a lot easier when you straighten out the wire: the bead simply slides down a 4 5 45^\circ gradient. The centripetal force component (in the ( x , y ) (x,y) plane) does not affect the acceleration along the path at all.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, indeed. It's basically a ramp problem in disguise. Although I'm starting to develop a taste for scalar-based physics (Lagrange / energy) as opposed to vector-based physics (Newton / force). With the former, the behavior simply comes out of the math, without requiring a bunch of reasoning about how things "should" behave.

Steven Chase - 3 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

The energy approach (or Lagrange or Hamilton) is very nice if the system is conservative-- but that does not always work!

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Arjen Vreugdenhil That's right. That's the Achilles heel.

Steven Chase - 3 years, 9 months ago

Analysis with forces: the net force is a combination of the centripetal force F c p F_{cp} and a force along the wire F p a r F_{par} . It is the result of a normal force F n F_n perpendicular to the wire and the gravitational force F g F_g . We have

F c p = F n , i n ; F p a r = F g sin 4 5 ; 0 = F n , u p F g cos 4 5 . F_{cp} = F_{n,in};\ \ \ F_{par} = F_g\sin 45^\circ;\ \ \ 0 = F_{n,up} - F_g\cos 45^\circ.

The acceleration along the wire (i.e. rate of increase of speed) is a p a r = F g sin 4 5 m = g 2 . a_{par} = \frac{F_g\sin 45^\circ}m = \frac g{\sqrt 2}. The vertical component of this acceleration is a z = a p a r sin 4 5 = g 2 1 2 = g 2 . a_z = a_{par}\sin 45^\circ = \frac{g}{\sqrt 2}\cdot \frac 1{\sqrt 2} = \frac g 2. The centripetal acceleration points toward the axis of the spiral and does not contribute to the vertical component.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 9 months ago
Ujjwal Rane
Aug 25, 2017

A helix is nothing but an inclined plane that is wound around a vertical axis! So Let's unwide a turn or a complete rotation 2 π 2\pi of this helix.

Since the radius is 1 unit, the horizontal distance covered = 2 π = 2\pi this will result in vertical rise of 2 π 2\pi . Hence the angle of this inclined plane must be 45°

Since the acceleration of a body sliding down an inclined plane in absence of friction is g sin θ g \sin \theta its vertical component will be g sin θ × cos θ g \sin \theta \times \cos \theta

Substituting θ = 45 ° \theta = 45° we get vertical acceleration = g sin 45 ° × cos 45 ° = g 2 = g \sin 45° \times \cos 45° = \frac{g}{2}

Exceptional! Lovely way of looking at the problem. Kudos!

Aniruddh Patil - 3 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you! :-)

Ujjwal Rane - 3 years, 9 months ago

um, the vertical component would be g sin θ × sin θ g \sin \theta\times \sin \theta according to where θ \theta is on the picture, it's just that in this case sin = cos.

Duke Garland - 3 years, 9 months ago
Oliver Piattella
Aug 25, 2017

I will use Newton's second law projected along the constraint (the wire). The position of the particle is:

r = ( cos θ , sin θ , θ ) \textbf{r} = (\cos\theta,\sin\theta,\theta)

its velocity is

r ˙ = ( sin θ , cos θ , 1 ) θ ˙ \dot{\textbf{r}} = (-\sin\theta,\cos\theta,1)\dot{\theta}

where the dot denotes derivation with respect to the time, and its acceleration is

r ¨ = ( cos θ , sin θ , 0 ) θ ˙ 2 + ( sin θ , cos θ , 1 ) θ ¨ \ddot{\textbf{r}} = (-\cos\theta, -\sin\theta, 0)\dot{\theta}^2 + (-\sin\theta, \cos\theta, 1)\ddot{\theta}

The vertical acceleration is θ ¨ \ddot{\theta} and the force field is F = m g z ^ \textbf{F} = -mg\hat{\textbf{z}} . The direction of the constraint (the wire) is given by the versor

r ˙ ^ = 1 2 ( sin θ , cos θ , 1 ) \hat{\dot{\textbf{r}}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(-\sin\theta,\cos\theta,1)

and the projected Newton's second law reads:

F r ˙ ^ = m r ¨ r ˙ ^ \textbf{F}\cdot \hat{\dot{\textbf{r}}} = m\ddot{\textbf{r}}\cdot\hat{\dot{\textbf{r}}}

Substituting the components determined earlier, we get:

m g 2 = m 2 [ sin θ ( cos θ θ ˙ 2 sin θ θ ¨ ) + cos θ ( sin θ θ ˙ 2 + cos θ θ ¨ ) + θ ¨ ] -\frac{mg}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{m}{\sqrt{2}}\left[-\sin\theta(-\cos\theta\dot{\theta}^2 - \sin\theta\ddot{\theta}) + \cos\theta(-\sin\theta\dot{\theta}^2 + \cos\theta\ddot{\theta}) + \ddot{\theta}\right]

and finally

θ ¨ = g 2 \boxed{\ddot{\theta} = -\frac{g}{2}}

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...